I figured it out! I had my user's name typed into the Allow/Deny. I deleted
this name and it worked.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
> > yum install hplip hplip-gui system-config-printer
>
> hplip only supports that printer with a proprietary plugin. :-(
Frank Murphy wrote:
> yum install hplip hplip-gui system-config-printer
hplip only supports that printer with a proprietary plugin. :-(
(That's the case for all the printers supported by those foo2* drivers.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:34 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Why is gnome-scan-0.6.2-7.fc15 offered in Fedora 16 when it has been
> retired months ago and is affected by serious crashers? The reports in
> bugzilla are without a reply from the assignee:
>
> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnome-sca
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 19:35 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 06:38 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > The issue that came up in the discussion was that there is a good group
> > to use to include for QA. The qa group isn't really used and proventesters
> > is a bit broad and its fu
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 08:13 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Two F16 reinstalls later, each time fiddling with the mdraid partition
> layouts, yet each time producing the same results, I found
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F16_bugs#Cannot_boot_with_.2Fboot_partition_on_a_software_RAID_
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 13:42 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:17:05PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 11/09/2011 06:59 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> > > Seems surprising (to me) that it'd be installed, and the port open in
> > > the firewall, but not enabled.
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 11:35 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, looking closer, why is it that rawhide still contains
> python-2.7.2-16.fc17, when according to
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python.git
> that version was replaced two weeks ago due to the recent glibc issues?
We haven't actu
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 17:48 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Fedora 16 is not science fiction. It is here right now:
> > http://get.fedoraproject.org
>
> Hmm, no jigdo downloads any more?
Releng say they dropped jigdo due to overwhelming indifference (the
download numbers for the jigdo im
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753955
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753955
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Hi,
during the build of the new scummvm release we run into the following
build issue:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3507060&name=build.log
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id
/builddir/build/BUILD/scummvm-1.4.0
extracting debug info from
/builddir/build/BUILD
On 11/14/2011 11:03 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> This is with NetworkManager-0.9.1.90-5.git20110927.fc16.x86_64
>
> NM should allow static addresses in addition to RA/DHCP ones. While the
> UI currently might restrict that (should get fixed) I'd expect it to
> work with the right bits in the ifcfg
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Or we can open it to the entire project and
> just assume that the electorate will ensure that nobody inappropriate
> gets elected.
I don't see the harm in letting the electorate decide this. If you're
not a packager and you somehow manage
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 22:39 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 06:43 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> >>
> >> So you say that both
> >>
> >> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
> >> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
> >>
> >> Shoudl wo
Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 12:31 -0500 schrieb Clyde E. Kunkel:
>
> Multidisciplinary membership is good. However, please keep a balance in
> that no one group is over represented.
>
> Also, how about a non-technical member from the general user community?
I'd say no. Not only because I thin
On 11/14/2011 09:20 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> that's unfortunate. f16 doesn't pxe install for me, and I'd rather make sure
>> this
>> doesn't affect 17 sooner rather than later. Where can I find the compose
>> scripts
>> So I can build images lo
El Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:20:13 -0800
Jesse Keating escribió:
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > that's unfortunate. f16 doesn't pxe install for me, and I'd rather
> > make sure this doesn't affect 17 sooner rather than later. Where
> > can I find the compose scripts So I can
On 11/14/2011 05:50 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:31:21PM -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>
>> Also, how about a non-technical member from the general user community?
Very strong no from me.
FESCO is a technical committee, supposed to provide strategic technical
decisions
On 11/14/2011 06:43 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>>
>> So you say that both
>>
>> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
>> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
>>
>> Shoudl work?
>> (Have not tested yet, but might do that later today).
>
> I believ
On 11/14/2011 07:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>* AGREED: tell maintainer to please support listening on both ipv4 and
> ipv6 in vsftpd.
A rather odd something like this found it self on fesco tables instead
of an RFE against component.
If I'm not mistake the only thing you need to do is se
On Nov 14, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> that's unfortunate. f16 doesn't pxe install for me, and I'd rather make sure
> this
> doesn't affect 17 sooner rather than later. Where can I find the compose
> scripts
> So I can build images locally to debug this ?
Pungi can be used, or pro
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:29:10AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Looking at
> > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-2014/logs/mash.log
> > (and previous logs), I don't see any obvious message for why
Hi.
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:34:04 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote
> It seems you have your layering wrong. IPSec operates on IP
> protocol, below UDP and TCP. Only IKE, the key exchange, protocol
> works on UDP. Maybe you thought about different technology? For VPN,
> OpenVPN provided in Fedora suppo
On 11/14/2011 12:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> ruby-libs ((Ruby or GPLv2) and (GPL+ or Artistic))
> ypserv (GPLv2)
At a quick glance, these are the only two areas of licensing concern,
and Ruby can be resolved with a major version update as pointed out
elsewhere.
Thorsten, would you be willing to
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:42 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 06:48 -0500, Mystilleef wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Wow, I read this a little too late. I did an update, using
> > --skip-broken, today and now Xorg is broken. I use the open source ati
> > drivers. The Xorg log indicates
Hi,
I would be willing to swap a review of gmtk [1] in rpmfusion for another
review, be it RPM Fusion or Fedora, preferably not something overly
complex. Feel free to contact me if you are interested.
Cheers,
Julian
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958
--
devel mailing list
Greetings.
Fedora Infrastructure is in the planning stages for migrating
fedorahosted.org over to new hardware. As part of this planning we
would like to hold a Virtual Fedora Activity day in the #fedora-fad
IRC channel on freenode.
(or any other places that make sense after we organize in #fedo
If its perl, I'm probably not qualified. Anyone else want to take this?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Nathaniel McCallum
> wrote:
>> Yes, I'll review it.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
>
> It's perl based so if you
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Nathaniel McCallum
wrote:
> Yes, I'll review it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
It's perl based so if you're not familiar with perl packaging (this is
my first perl package) it might help to get someone from the perl-sig
to review it as well.
On 14/11/11 19:27, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> I'm having a problem that I haven't had for years. With each upgrade
> since maybe 2005 until Fedora 16, I have been able to install the xqx
> driver for my HP P1005 with no problems; I just followed the directions
> at http://foo2zjs.rkkda.c
Yes, I'll review it.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I was looking for a way to check abi compatibility for a package I
> maintain that does not control API/ABI compatibility and found this:
>
> http://forge.ispras.ru/projects/abi-compliance-checker
>
> I already have it pa
Hi,
Fedora ships the open source "vpnc" client which supports the Cisco VPN
environment. I'm using it daily and it works for me without any problems.
There is also a proprietary client from Cisco:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/index.html .
On 11/14/2011 06:34 PM, Tomasz T
I was looking for a way to check abi compatibility for a package I
maintain that does not control API/ABI compatibility and found this:
http://forge.ispras.ru/projects/abi-compliance-checker
I already have it packaged for my own use so I thought I'd check to
see if anyone else is interested in it
On 11/14/2011 08:59 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
Hi,
GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>>
On 11/14/2011 02:27 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> I'm having a problem that I haven't had for years. With each upgrade
> since maybe 2005 until Fedora 16, I have been able to install the xqx
> driver for my HP P1005 with no problems; I just followed the directions
> at http://foo2zjs.rk
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-11-14)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-11-14/fesco.2011-11-14-18.00.log.html
Meeting summary
-
On 11/14/2011 06:38 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The issue that came up in the discussion was that there is a good group
> to use to include for QA. The qa group isn't really used and proventesters
> is a bit broad and its future is in question. One possible solution is
> to start using the qa grou
Le 14/11/2011 20:12, Iain Arnell a écrit :
>
> Also without reading the source, just the license tags, all of those
> "Lessers" and "pluses" make most of them compatible. Even Perl's
> "unholy" license (really (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic)
> and Copyright Only and MIT and Public Domai
Hi gang,
I'm having a problem that I haven't had for years. With each upgrade since
maybe 2005 until Fedora 16, I have been able to install the xqx driver for
my HP P1005 with no problems; I just followed the directions at
http://foo2zjs.rkkda.com/. But with Fedora 16 it is not working. Is there
a
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:57:20PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>
> A quick scan says this affects:
> libguestfs (LGPLv2+)
The LGPLv2+ libguestfs.so libr
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
> >
> > A quick scan says this affects:
> [...]
On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>
> A quick scan says this affects:
[...]
> ypserv (GPLv2)
This one looks like an incompatibility.
--
devel mai
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 16:15:05 +,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
> group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the
> body with technic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746196
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Looking at
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-2014/logs/mash.log
> (and previous logs), I don't see any obvious message for why the images/
> directory isn't being created in the composes.
>
> anyon
Looking at http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-2014/logs/mash.log
(and previous logs), I don't see any obvious message for why the images/
directory isn't being created in the composes.
anyone have info on what's broken ?
Dave
--
devel mai
The ARM Secondary Arch project[0] is working on an F15 release for the
existing armv5tel architecture as well as the new armv7hl architecture
(with hardfp ABI). This effort has been previously announced and is
ongoing. A number of minor package changes are required as a result of
this effort:
(1)
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:19:50PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
> > fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
> > group. That's arguably overly r
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
A quick scan says this affects:
avahi-ui-tools (LGPLv2)
gnu-smalltalk (GPLv2+ with exceptions)
jpilot-backup (GPLv2+)
libguestfs (LGPLv2+)
librep (GPLv2+)
man-d
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>
> So you say that both
>
> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
>
> Shoudl work?
> (Have not tested yet, but might do that later today).
I believe
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:08:05PM +0400, Lucas wrote:
> I am talking about ipsec over TCP.
>
> Everything can do ipsec over UDP, but none over TCP. But on my job for the
> security reason UDP is
> blocked, cisco vpn can do ipsec over tcp.
It seems you have your layering wrong. IPSec operates
Hi,
GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
Cheers,
Honza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I am talking about ipsec over TCP.
Everything can do ipsec over UDP, but none over TCP. But on my job for the
security reason UDP is
blocked, cisco vpn can do ipsec over tcp.
That is why I asked.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
>> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
>> group. That's arguably overly restrictive
Lucas wrote:
> Have anyone here tried to compile cisco vpn for Fedora 16 - 32 or 64 bit?
> I need it sometimes and it should support ipsec over tcp, unfortunately
> nothing in unix can provide it.
NetworkManager works with Cisco VPN tunnels.
Cisco also provides a Linux client that you can use.
On 11/14/2011 04:30 PM, drago01 wrote:
> That does not make sense. Why should a "non-technical member" be in
> the body that make technical decisions?
Agreed FESCO needs to be made up of people with really strong technical
background and a be very skilled in maintaining and packaging components
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Lucas wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Have anyone here tried to compile cisco vpn for Fedora 16 - 32 or 64 bit?
> I need it sometimes and it should support ipsec over tcp, unfortunately
> nothing in unix can provide it.
Have you ever tried NetworkManager-vpnc (and the unde
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 16:44 +, Paul Johnson wrote:
> What I'm thinking is that if (say) xorg-x11 is built, the drivers also
> get built to ensure the likes of the ABI problem I've hit doesn't
> happen
I understand the desire, yes. I was expressing surprise that I hadn't
adequately guarded yo
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:31:21PM -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Also, how about a non-technical member from the general user community?
> Should provide a nice balance to the technical side.
Fesco exists to make technical decisions. The people who are members
should be competent to make th
Dear All
Have anyone here tried to compile cisco vpn for Fedora 16 - 32 or 64 bit?
I need it sometimes and it should support ipsec over tcp, unfortunately nothing
in unix can provide it.
Thanks for suggestions.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Le Lun 14 novembre 2011 10:52, heiterbisstuermig a écrit :
> Hi,
> There is a version of texlive-2011 for Fedora 16. You can get it from
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
However, this work is still not imported in Fedora, so it would be nice if
interested TEX users could help Ji
Hi,
>> For example, xorg-x11 is currently messed up for a number of
>> subpackages (as is libreoffice - poppler seems broken again). What
>> would be great would be if when xorg-x11 is rebuild, all of the
>> xorg-x11 subpackages are automagically rebuilt and if one of those
>> fails, then the main
Le Lun 14 novembre 2011 15:36, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> Did --skip-broken not do what you'd wanted?
Yesterday evening skip-broken would install new xorg drivers but not the
server package, and x would die on startup stating modules are at abi version
12, but server only at abi version 11 (or som
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel
wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 11:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
>>> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the pac
On 11/14/2011 11:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
>> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
>> group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
> group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the
> body with technical oversight
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:11 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bug 737387 fixes a race condition that can cause fork() in a multithreaded
> program to lock up.
>
> I can confirm that the issue fixed in bug 737387 exists in Fedora 14 as well.
> Fedora 14 isn't at end of life just yet (though it's
Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the
body with technical oversight over the entire project, not merely
packaging, and in that s
Hi,
Bug 737387 fixes a race condition that can cause fork() in a multithreaded
program to lock up.
I can confirm that the issue fixed in bug 737387 exists in Fedora 14 as well.
Fedora 14 isn't at end of life just yet (though it's close!). Is there any
chance of getting a glibc update for 14
Mystilleef writes:
> Hello,
>
> Wow, I read this a little too late. I did an update, using
> --skip-broken, today and now Xorg is broken. I use the open source ati
> drivers. The Xorg log indicates a version mismatch between Xorg and
> the drivers. Is there a way to reverse or fix this?
yum hist
commit 80c6d2baf966f400d06348add1ade0d3891e6e43
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Nov 14 16:51:09 2011 +0100
update to 0.33
.gitignore|1 +
perlbrew.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
in
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perlbrew:
3efc9e895843427edd2062f999c9cc7b App-perlbrew-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update process
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:50 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Probably there's a way to achieve the same thing that won't end with yum
> > complaining about the rpmdb being modified behind its back, but meh.
>
> # sudo yum downgrade ./xorg-x11-*$(arch).rpm
Probably also
Adam Jackson wrote:
> Probably there's a way to achieve the same thing that won't end with yum
> complaining about the rpmdb being modified behind its back, but meh.
# sudo yum downgrade ./xorg-x11-*$(arch).rpm
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 06:48 -0500, Mystilleef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wow, I read this a little too late. I did an update, using
> --skip-broken, today and now Xorg is broken. I use the open source ati
> drivers. The Xorg log indicates a version mismatch between Xorg and
> the drivers. Is there a way
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 00:45 +, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to configure koji to do a package rebuild when key
> components are submitted?
>
> For example, xorg-x11 is currently messed up for a number of
> subpackages (as is libreoffice - poppler seems broken again). What
> wo
On 14. nov. 2011 13:59, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:06:36AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>>
>> There is - however - one option I am missing: Some form of combined
>> static and dynamic configuration.
>> IE. I want the server to obtain an IPv6-address dynamically, but i ALS
Compose started at Mon Nov 14 08:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-
lör 2011-11-12 klockan 09:04 -0500 skrev Sam Varshavchik:
> For the longest time, I was able to upgrade an existing system by copying
> over the pxeboot vmlinuz and initrd.img, sticking them into menu.lst, and
> directing grub to load them.
This is also how I install. Have worked fine with bot
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:06:36AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>
> There is - however - one option I am missing: Some form of combined
> static and dynamic configuration.
> IE. I want the server to obtain an IPv6-address dynamically, but i ALSO
> want it to have one (or more) static IP-address(es
Hello,
Wow, I read this a little too late. I did an update, using
--skip-broken, today and now Xorg is broken. I use the open source ati
drivers. The Xorg log indicates a version mismatch between Xorg and
the drivers. Is there a way to reverse or fix this?
Thanks
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On 11/12/2011 02:33 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
> What package is that man page in?
>
> $ man 7 daemon
> No manual entry for daemon in section 7
>
> Also, a google search for "man 7 daemon", "daemon(7)", "daemon man
> page", "man daemon section 7", etc turns up nothing.
As others already pointed out,
So far I've only noticed it via a test, but everyone uses *printf,
and malloc is implicated due to recent arena-related changes:
malloc deadlock makes *printf hang
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/753601
With glibc-2.14.90-15.2.x86_64 (f16-testing and rawhide), this hangs:
( ulimit -v 1000
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man7/daemon.7.gz
systemd-37-3.fc16.x86_64
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:22:02PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Please have a look at the check list in daemon(7).
>
> What package is that man page in?
>
> $ man 7 daemon
> No manual entry
On 11/12/2011 09:58 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:10:09PM +0100, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 11. November 2011, 10:47:12 schrieb Adam Tkac:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources`
>>> command but it failed with
>>> "pyc
On 11/14/2011 01:28 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
> Anyway, I'll start work on the logging changes and add a unit file and
> see how we go. Should autofs install the unit file into the systemd area
> or what should do?
So the final unit file should look something like this...
### autofs.service ###
[Unit]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:17:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> Compose started at Sun Nov 13 08:15:32 UTC 2011
>>
>> Broken deps for x86_64
>> --
>> i3-4.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64
Just reinstalled two servers with F16 this weekend, and IPv6 seems to be
working fine in NetworkManager.
There is - however - one option I am missing: Some form of combined
static and dynamic configuration.
IE. I want the server to obtain an IPv6-address dynamically, but i ALSO
want it to have
Hi,
There is a version of texlive-2011 for Fedora 16. You can get it from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
Greetings
Christoph
On 11/13/2011 06:31 PM, Henrique Junior wrote:
Hi, in F16 we are still using texlive-2007.
Any plans to bring more updated texlive versions to F16 (
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751751
--- Comment #9 from Trever Adams 2011-11-14 04:30:57 EST
---
This may have fixed the problem with ddclient being abusive with d
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:17:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Sun Nov 13 08:15:32 UTC 2011
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> i3-4.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libyajl.so.1()(64bit)
This simply requires a rebuild to
Hi folks,
This is just one more email on this quite high-traffic list. So, I'd really
appreciate if you read it.
I'm Alexey Vasyukov (FAS username - anganar). I participate in Fedora
Project for about 3 years, and my RHEL / Fedora experience is about 7
years. I work at MIPT (Moscow Institute of P
94 matches
Mail list logo
