Re: Bug 750566 - qtparted won't install because it is from F15 and requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1

2011-11-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom Callaway wrote: > I took a quick look at qtparted a few days ago, the problem is that > qtparted depended on functionality (move, copy, resize) in parted that > no longer exists in parted-3.0. So should we package a compat package? kde-partitionmanager is also affected. Neither appear to have

[Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 5 (RC5) Available Now!

2011-11-02 Thread Andre Robatino
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 5 (RC5) is now available for testing. Changes are listed in the rel-eng ticket below. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (

Re: Some unsolicited praise for all Fedora developers

2011-11-02 Thread Peter Gueckel
Bojan Smojver wrote: > I upgraded my... machines to (what will be) F-16 and I really wish to > congratulate all Fedora developers on a job well done. > > PS. Of course, kudos to all upstream folks as well. +1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Some unsolicited praise for all Fedora developers

2011-11-02 Thread Bojan Smojver
I upgraded my three machines to (what will be) F-16 and I really wish to congratulate all Fedora developers on a job well done. Especially noticeable is increase in speed and responsiveness of my laptop. So, pat yourselves on the back folks - you deserve it! And thank you. PS. Of course, kudos to

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-11-02 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/11/11 17:23, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Is there no branch mod_wsgi for epel6? >> > I believe mod_wsgi is in RHEL6 thus no EPEL6 branch at this time. > > -Toshio Yes it is. I just checked this (should have done this earlier, before asking) - --

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Gary T. Giesen

2011-11-02 Thread Sven Lankes
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:17:49AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I've orphaned the following: Thank you. I've taken > daemonize and > rancid Co-Maintainers very-welcome. -- sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: converting init.d to systemd, koji (scratch) builds fail

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Paul Howarth wrote: > You need to "BuildRequire: systemd-units", which is where the > %{_unitdir} macro is defined. Shouldn't this [systemd-units] be added to the main build root? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: converting init.d to systemd, koji (scratch) builds fail

2011-11-02 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:05:19PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > I looked at other spec files with systemd .system files. The relevant > part of my spec file is: > ... > %{_unitdir}/glusterd.service > %{_unitdir}/glusterfsd.service > ... > > and the koji build is failing with: > ... > Process

Re: converting init.d to systemd, koji (scratch) builds fail

2011-11-02 Thread Paul Howarth
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:05:19 -0400 "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote: > I looked at other spec files with systemd .system files. The relevant > part of my spec file is: > > ... > %files server > ... > %if 0%{?fedora} < 17 > # Legacy init > %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterd > %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterf

converting init.d to systemd, koji (scratch) builds fail

2011-11-02 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
I looked at other spec files with systemd .system files. The relevant part of my spec file is: ... %files server ... %if 0%{?fedora} < 17 # Legacy init %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterd %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterfsd %else %{_unitdir}/glusterd.service %{_unitdir}/glusterfsd.service %endif ... and

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Jesse Keating wrote: > Please test these updates and let me know if all is good, or if you have > other issues. Bodhi karma, email, IRC, smoke signal, just let me know. ) ( ( ) ( ) -X- Works fine here. Pulled, uploaded new source code, and built a package. -- deve

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > I would appreciate even a quick patch as without fedpkg is unusable to > me (and I guess I'm not the only one whose login != fas username). There is a global fedpkg option to define your username. -u USER, --user USER Override the use

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:47 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate. > > That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code > soon as > I also have to supp

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 2.11.2011 01:04, Jesse Keating napsal(a): >> For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for >> fedpkg (part of fedora-packager). > > What's wrong with patches in > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/{98,99,100,

[Bug 750039] perl-Module-Runtime-0.11 and perl-Class-Load-0.12 in F16

2011-11-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750039 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: Bug 750566 - qtparted won't install because it is from F15 and requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Given that neither Anaconda nor parted/qtparted worked, is there an > alternative workflow for dual-boot installing with pre-existing OS? > I finished the install by going back into Windows, and shrinking their > partition from within Windows. Maybe give RC4 a shot? The

Re: Bug 750566 - qtparted won't install because it is from F15 and requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1

2011-11-02 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 11/02/2011 10:14 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 11/01/2011 11:30 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: >> I installed F16 RC2 Live, and tried to install qtparted. >> It won't install because the most recent qtparted RPM is from F15 and >> requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1 pulled in by F16

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 2.11.2011 01:04, Jesse Keating napsal(a): > For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for > fedpkg (part of fedora-packager). What's wrong with patches in https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/{98,99,100,101}? Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

[389-devel] Please review: Fix Coverity Defects

2011-11-02 Thread Noriko Hosoi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750622 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=531391&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=531391&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750624 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=531390&action=diff h

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate. That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code soon as I also have to support discovering user name based on kerberos information. -- Jesse Kea

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > While doing the update, it seems that the version are not enforced. > There are not GitPython >= XXX (I don't know how fedpkg will do with the > old version) fedpkg will work with the older GitPython. There is some other software being u

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-11-02 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:54:13AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/11/11 21:56, James Bowes wrote: > > ipython -- An enhanced interactive Python shell mod_wsgi -- A WSGI > > interface for Python web applications in Apache > > > I'm interes

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Gary T. Giesen

2011-11-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 22:14:11 +0200 Jussi Lehtola wrote: > I'm Gary's sponsor. I, too, have been trying to contact him for a long > time. As nothing has happened, I have revoked my sponsorship. I've orphaned the following: daemonize rancid sipcalc kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signatu

Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2011-10-31

2011-11-02 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 31.10.2011 18:49, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > 17:39:57 I'm hesitant to mention UsrMove, both because tl;dr and > also I'm told that the Feature hasn't been updated as they were instructed > to We attended LinuxCon in Prague last week, so this week, we will update the rest. > 17:40:25 * abadger

Re: glusterfs and hekafs release number for f16 and rawhide; systemd switch-over

2011-11-02 Thread Niels de Vos
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:01:33AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the > same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm, > glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and > hekafs-0.7

Re: Bug 750566 - qtparted won't install because it is from F15 and requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1

2011-11-02 Thread Tom Callaway
On 11/01/2011 11:30 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > I installed F16 RC2 Live, and tried to install qtparted. > It won't install because the most recent qtparted RPM is from F15 and > requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1 pulled in by F16's > parted. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: Rawhide evolution gone funny

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:01:16 +, PR (Peter) wrote: > > Any ideas on what's happened? > > > > [paul@PB3 ~]$ rpm -qa evolution* > > evolution-data-server-3.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64 > > evolution-spamassassin-3.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64 > > evolution-data-server-devel-3.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64 > > evolution-exchange-3.

Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2011-10-31

2011-11-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 08:31 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 11/02/2011 07:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > >> * #683 - Zif as default PackageKit backend for desktop users - > > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

F-16 Branched report: 20111102 changes

2011-11-02 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Nov 2 08:16:11 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PackageKit-zif-0.6.19-3.fc16.x86_64 requires zif >= 0:0.2.5 bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) cluster-snmp-0.18.7-

Developer Suite for Fedora

2011-11-02 Thread Souheil LADHIB
Good Morning, Can I use Red Hat Developer Suite and Red Hat Application Server Packages for Fedora15? LADHIB Souheil -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Also: > $ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool > Cloning into R-widgetTool... > Received disconnect from : 2: Too many authentication failures for > builder > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly [... snip ...] > It seems it is not reading t

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Anonymously checking doesn't help: > $ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool -a Never-mind this part, I had a typo (R-widgetTool*s*). Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-02 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg > (part of fedora-packager). > > This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend. > Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPyt

Re: Rawhide evolution gone funny

2011-11-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On 2 Nov 2011 07:57, "Paul Johnson" wrote: > > Hi, > > For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or anything. It'll start but has on the title bar > > (null) Evolution. > > From the command line, I'm getting this > > [paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution > > e-utils-WARNING **: /usr/lib64/evo

Rawhide evolution gone funny

2011-11-02 Thread Paul Johnson
Hi, For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or anything. It'll start but has on the title bar (null) Evolution. >From the command line, I'm getting this [paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution e-utils-WARNING **: /usr/lib64/evolution/3.2/libcomposer.so.0: undefined symbol: gtkhtml_editor_

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-11-02 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/11 21:56, James Bowes wrote: > ipython -- An enhanced interactive Python shell mod_wsgi -- A WSGI > interface for Python web applications in Apache I'm interested in those two packages and requested rights in pkgdb. Is there no branch mod_ws

Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2011-10-31

2011-11-02 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 11/02/2011 07:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> * #683 - Zif as default PackageKit backend for desktop users - > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ZifByDefaultForDesktop > >> (sgallagh, 17:03:32) > >>