On 10/25/2011 07:23 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Yet as long as it is not done, encrypting /usr is no improvement. And
> even if it is done, you would also need to verify that nobody installed
> a keyboard logger on your device if your fear attackers that have easily
> physical access to the device in qu
On 10/25/2011 08:33 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams:
>> Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
>>> I created feature page
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
>>
>> I strongly object to this "feature". /bin/sh is a Unix standard back to
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more proventesters/testers.
* One stop page for upda
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:30 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
> > negative.
>
> Coming from someone (me) who often does updates involving > 1 pkg that
> sometimes require removing/adding components after initial submission, I
> very
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
>> bodhi v0.8.3
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
>> bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all
>> releases.
>
>> Server fixes
>> ---
hi
well, suversion 1.7 was not pushed until now and that is
why i think it's a good moment for my questions:
as far as i can see there are different maintainers for
"subversion" and "kdesvn", upgrade to subversion 1.7
(including svn upgrade in the working-dir) works fine
but with subversion 1.7
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 16:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> FAS and bodhi are single sign on (iirc, everything on
> admin.fedoraproject.org).
Well, Bodhi seems to do a damn good job of forgetting you're signed in.
I've never tried to analyze this carefully, it's just a subjective
feeling that I s
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:03 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> > Think about how bugzilla bugs are handled in IRC. Bugs all have ID
> > numbers. Why should updates be different? I vote for static IDs because
> > I have run into the case of modified updates and broken URLs.
>
> > Adam, can you not pursu
Hey, folks. Just thought I'd send out an overview of remaining
unaddressed F16 blockers, in case anyone can help with them. We were
scheduled to do the F16 RC compose today, but with these unaddressed, we
can't. We hope we'll be able to do the compose tomorrow, but if blockers
remain unaddressed, w
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:39PM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Correct -- it's not currently two-factor (it's either this or that). We've
> > been kicking around whether we want to make it two-factor, how we'd do that,
> > who we'd
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> So do I. So let's come back to the original discussion.
>
I've added some points from re-reading the FHS and from this thread onto the
Feature page. The immediate suggestion I have is that you should consider
splitting the / => /usr
Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Björn Persson :
> > It's particularly odd that I can use /sbin/mkfs to make a disk image
> > without privileges, but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the
> > image and the mount point.
>
> You could create a setuid-root executable on the disk image and
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 6:32:26 PM, Michael wrote:
> Luke Macken wrote:
>>> In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
>>> > negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
>>> > update actually*was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to c
Luke Macken wrote:
>> In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
>> > negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
>> > update actually*was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to creating
>> > the 'old-style' URLs manually when I do lists of
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:59:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > bodhi v0.8.3
> >
> >
> > Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
> > bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 16:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:59:51 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > > bodhi v0.8.3
> > >
> > >
> > > Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into
> > > produc
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:59:51 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > bodhi v0.8.3
> >
> >
> > Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into
> > production. The bodhi-client is currently on it's way to
> > updates-testing f
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I must admit I do to.
Oh, good lord. Excuse me while I shoot myself.
(that was a typo, not just idiocy. But still.)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.hap
2011/10/25 Björn Persson :
>
> It's particularly odd that I can use /sbin/mkfs to make a disk image without
> privileges, but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the image and the
> mount point.
You could create a setuid-root executable on the disk image and then mount it.
--
Jeff Ollie
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> bodhi v0.8.3
>
>
> Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
> bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all releases.
> Server fixes
>
>
> - Default to update ID-
=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Persson?= writes:
> It's particularly odd that I can use /sbin/mkfs to make a disk image without
> privileges, but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the image and
> the
> mount point. The division into bin and sbin seems rater arbitrary and I see
> no
> signi
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> If there were any commands in
> sbin that are usable also for regular users then they should have been
> moved to bin.
Some examples of commands that are usable to unprivileged users:
ip route
ifconfig -a
lspci
lsusb
lsmod
ldconfig -p
mkfs ~/my_disk_image
fuser
lsof
mksock ~/m
On 24 October 2011 01:20, Vincent Beers wrote:
[..]
> If there is no package maintainer, I'm willing to try and be one, since
> I'm a bit of a fan of the software. (Though I'll have to study up on
> package maintaining.)
>
Nice. You may want to have a look at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_th
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
>> you go and read these first:
>>
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
>> http:
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all releases.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
I raced to get this out before the infrastructure freeze today, and since the
Chris Adams writes:
> Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski said:
>> What is wrong with
>> #!/usr/bin/env interpreter
>> from technical POV?
> It is an unnecessary hack,
Even if it were not a hack, and not significantly slower, it would still
be completely unacceptable because it will break just
So do I. So let's come back to the original discussion.
Am 25.10.2011 22:11 schrieb "Chris Adams" :
> Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham said:
> > I'm not sure why this would even be discussed.
> >
> > ln -s /usr/bin /bin, and move along to other business.
>
> I think someone proposed (as an addit
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham said:
> I'm not sure why this would even be discussed.
>
> ln -s /usr/bin /bin, and move along to other business.
I think someone proposed (as an addition to UsrMove) having the /bin,
/sbin, etc. symlinks deprecated and to remove them in a couple of
releases. I
Alexander Kurtakov (akurt...@redhat.com) said:
> Someone would have to find a "killer feature" to justify touching this amount
> of packages :). Not to mention that such changes should happen upstream and I
> (probably a number of other maintainers too) would not maintain local patches
> for sm
2011/10/25 Daniel J Walsh :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/25/2011 03:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski
w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2011 03:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski
>>> wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
>>>
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > >> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
> > >> > Once upon a time, Michał Piot
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:17:54PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
> > you go and read these first:
> >
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/18
2011/10/25 Adam Williamson :
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> >> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
>> >> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
>> >> >> I created
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
> >> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
> >> >> I created feature page
> >> >> https://fedorap
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
> you go and read these first:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184209
> h
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Correct -- it's not currently two-factor (it's either this or that). We've
> been kicking around whether we want to make it two-factor, how we'd do that,
> who we'd enforce it upon, etc, for a while... it's hard because we have
> several d
On 21:59:40 Tuesday 25 October 2011 Josh Stone wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 11:24 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> >
> > napisał:
> >> W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
> >>
> >> napisał:
> >>> On 10/24/2011 10:1
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.12-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
7a438a5... Update to 0.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 08:32 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> You snipped the part where Kevin wrote "[...] if the maintainer
> demonstrates incompetence at taking these decisions, the offending
> maintainer needs to be replaced." The problem here appears to be a
> human one, not something that
commit 7a438a539122da2b15bf0e4e55300d4cb1bbeebd
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Oct 25 19:52:30 2011 +0100
Update to 0.12
- New upstream release 0.12:
- Require Module::Runtime ≥ 0.011, which fixes problems with Catalyst
under
Perl 5.8 and 5.10
- Add versioned run
2011/10/25 Frank Ch. Eigler :
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
>
>> [...]
>> What is wrong with
>> #!/usr/bin/env interpreter
>> from technical POV?
>
> It's more wordy.
Yes.
> It makes it impossible to pass an interpreter argument.
This actually may be a problem. For my use cases
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:39:25PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> >> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
>> >> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
>> >> >>
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load:
f1bb822ffb509b5f96b17237f318ab70 Class-Load-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
> Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
>> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
>> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
>> >> I created feature page
>> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
>> >
>> > I strongly object to this "feature". /b
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:39:25PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
> >> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
> >> >> I created feature page
> >> >> https://
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
> [...]
> What is wrong with
> #!/usr/bin/env interpreter
> from technical POV?
It's more wordy.
It makes it impossible to pass an interpreter argument.
It will execute slower.
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones :
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
>> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
>> >> I created feature page
>> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
>> >
>> > I strongl
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
> >> I created feature page
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
> >
> > I strongly object to this "feature". /bin/sh is a Unix standard back to
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
> > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
> >> I created feature page
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
> >
> > I strongly object to this "feature". /bin/sh is
2011/10/25 Chris Adams :
> Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
>> I created feature page
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
>
> I strongly object to this "feature". /bin/sh is a Unix standard back to
> IIRC around 7th Edition, and there is NO good reason
On 10/25/2011 11:24 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
>> napisał:
>>> On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
In any case
#!/usr/bin/env sh
s
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said:
> I created feature page
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
I strongly object to this "feature". /bin/sh is a Unix standard back to
IIRC around 7th Edition, and there is NO good reason to break it. The
"#!/usr/bin/env
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
> napisał:
>> On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> In any case
>>> #!/usr/bin/env sh
>>> seems to be more portable solution.
>>
>> please :) you can
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184209
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747377#c22
https://bugzilla.re
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>
> That's strange: the only two occasion I had a failed OTP were:
>
> 1) A configuration problem: (Yubikey not enabled, yubikey prefix not
> correct, using unburned key)
>
> 2) In a two slot configuration, whenever I press the button too long
> and it gen
Good news everyone!
At long last the Fedora Secondary Arch Team for Power proudly presents
the Fedora 16 Alpha release.
It's still hot, so grab it while you can from here (in case you have
appropriate hardware, obviously):
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/16-Alpha/ppc64/
Bu
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:41:21PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 05:30 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
> >> On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> >>> On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 10/25/20
On 10/25/2011 05:30 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> It's not only an aesthetic issue. Thi
Thanks Toshio for the correction!
Best,
Mario
On 25 October 2011 18:22, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40:29AM +0200, François Kooman wrote:
>> On 10/25/11 10:23 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>> > Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
>> > ssh. Yo
On 10/25/2011 11:30 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> It's not only an aesthetic issue. Thi
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40:29AM +0200, François Kooman wrote:
> On 10/25/11 10:23 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> > Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
> > ssh. You don't need the yubikey prompt: just put your username, go to
> > the password field and then press the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >> On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >>> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities,
> >>> which were no
Am 24.10.2011 12:45, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Linux rawhide.vmware.local 3.1.0-0.rc9.git0.0.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 5
> 14:37:47
>
> this is the last kernel booting in vmware for me
> all following see screenshot
Make sure your grub config
Am 25.10.2011 13:45 schrieb "Christoph Trassl" :
>
> On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >> On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >>> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities,
> >>> which were not doable before
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone?
Bibus, pybliographer?
Zoltan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/10/25 Harald Hoyer :
>> If anything, wouldn't it make more sense to move stuff in the opposite
>> direction, from /usr/bin to /bin ? "usr" doesn't really mean anything
>> - originally it was used because the filesystem format couldn't
>> support more than 64MB(?) in a single volume, so the sy
100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
/Mozilla-CA-20110409.tar.gz
/Mozilla-CA-20110904.tar.gz
/Mozilla-CA-20110914.tar.gz
+/Mozilla-CA-20111025.tar.gz
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index bc55b2f..9186574 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748770
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mozilla-CA:
74026b1a7aa0de8fc17d81efb3629195 Mozilla-CA-20111025.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities,
>>> which were not doable before.
> ...
>> - mount rootfs encrypted
>> - mount /usr not encry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20111025 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748771
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20111025 is available
Product
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.011 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748770
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.011 is available
Product: Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:56:19AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >> On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> >>> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
> >>> not do
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:46 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> > My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages
> > around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they
> > can't even install the package.
> >
> > Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm,
On 10/25/11 10:23 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
> ssh. You don't need the yubikey prompt: just put your username, go to
> the password field and then press the key's button.
Really? That seems weird. If someone takes my key they wo
Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
ssh. You don't need the yubikey prompt: just put your username, go to
the password field and then press the key's button.
Regards,
Mario
On 25 October 2011 10:13, François Kooman wrote:
> On 10/24/11 3:34 PM, Paul Wouters wr
On 10/24/11 3:34 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Yes, even using the latest rawhide versions of the yubikey related packages to
> work around the libusb issues.
My problem was, maybe I'm just stupid, that I assumed that a successful
test of the Yubikey in the FAS web interface would enable Yubikey
authe
On 2011-10-25, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Matej Cepl :
>> Dne 24.10.2011 22:48, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a):
>>> For example - you can switch to different version of language
>>> interpreter with different configuration without modification of the
>>> script and without the hassle for s
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
>>> not doable before.
> ...
>> - mount rootfs encrypted
>> - mount /usr not encry
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:34:46PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> ... The only breakage
> >> in one which was approved was to do with compiling things - which, sure,
> >> is a pain in the ass, but it's not the kind of problem critpath was
> >> intro
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
>> not doable before.
...
> - mount rootfs encrypted
> - mount /usr not encrypted (no secrets here)
this is already possible, I use
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46:31AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 18:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > We have lots of suggestions. As I've said at least fifty times, it's
> > > pointless going too far with the slapping of band-aids on the current
That's strange: the only two occasion I had a failed OTP were:
1) A configuration problem: (Yubikey not enabled, yubikey prefix not
correct, using unburned key)
2) In a two slot configuration, whenever I press the button too long
and it generates an OTP from the second slot
If you are sure that'
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
napisał:
> On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> In any case
>> #!/usr/bin/env sh
>> seems to be more portable solution.
>
> please :) you can propose this as a separate feature for F18 :) Let's
> see, if it gets accepted :)
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
> not doable before.
> - snapshot /usr (with btrfs)
> - hot swap the OS (/usr) with another version
> - mount /usr ro and keep the rootfs writeable
> - share the _whole_ OS with ot
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 09:06 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:02 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > On 10/24/2011 08:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >>> ===
> >>> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24)
> >>> ===
> >>> * Discussion
2011/10/25 Harald Hoyer :
> [ ... ]
> - mount /usr ro and keep the rootfs writeable
Which problem does this actually solve? People keep repeating that
like forever as if it is a magic bullet to solve something.
But it is a nice gimmick not more. And no it does not add any security.
--
devel maili
On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> In any case
> #!/usr/bin/env sh
> seems to be more portable solution.
please :) you can propose this as a separate feature for F18 :) Let's
see, if it gets accepted :)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 10/24/2011 08:27 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2011/10/24 Michał Piotrowski:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2011/10/24 Chris Adams:
* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
(t8m, 17:26:45)
>>>
>>
>> Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using
>> /bin
>> /sbin
>> /lib
>> /lib6
On 10/25/2011 09:02 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 08:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>> ===
>>> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24)
>>> ===
>>> * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
>>> (t8m,
On 10/24/2011 08:18 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/10/24 Chris Adams:
>>> ===
>>> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24)
>>> ===
>>>* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
>>> (t8m, 17:26:4
93 matches
Mail list logo
