Re: openSUSE announces release of openqa

2011-10-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 10:03 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Adam Williamson wrote: >> > The other problem with screenshot validation is that it's inherently >> > unsuited to some tests that are important to Fedora and that we have >> > more-or-less working *right now* in Aut

Re: openSUSE announces release of openqa

2011-10-15 Thread Jef Spaleta
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > (If someone suggests putting an OCR in the loop I'm going to get my > gun. :>) And I'll make sure that I grab my pumped up kicks so I have a marginally better chance to run faster than your bullets. -jef"why is _that_ song stuck in my hea

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

2011-10-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:40:20 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:13:08PM +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: > > tor 2011-10-13 klockan 12:32 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi: > > > > > Currently there's not a way to do this, but there really should > > > be. > > > > > > https://fedora

Re: openSUSE announces release of openqa

2011-10-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 10:03 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > The other problem with screenshot validation is that it's inherently > > unsuited to some tests that are important to Fedora and that we have > > more-or-less working *right now* in AutoQA - things like depcheck and

F-16 Branched report: 20111015 changes

2011-10-15 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Oct 15 08:15:59 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) cluster-s

Re: openSUSE announces release of openqa

2011-10-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > The other problem with screenshot validation is that it's inherently > unsuited to some tests that are important to Fedora and that we have > more-or-less working *right now* in AutoQA - things like depcheck and > repoclosure - because all it can really tell you is 'does th