On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:11:39PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>
> > As far as I know if you burn the key you will lose the ability to use
> > the yubikey's servers and I'm guessing coincidentally the lastpass as
> > well. I have seen that you are a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:03:55PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> > I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
> > currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
> > I hav
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 21:22 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the
> new Gnome 3
> > desktop and a laptop not running the ne
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> As far as I know if you burn the key you will lose the ability to use
> the yubikey's servers and I'm guessing coincidentally the lastpass as
> well. I have seen that you are allowed to upload a new key to their
> servers to restore its useability.
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Nathan O. wrote:
> Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and
> other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering
> getting the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The
> question is, if I burn the key first then i
Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and
other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering getting
the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The question is, if I
burn the key first then is it still usuable on Lastpass? I am assuming tha
On 2011-10-10 12:05, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> Do any of those cloud providers ever run the stock image or do they roll
>> their own with a custom built kernel anyways? I don't have a lot of
>> insight into this but was just curious what the la
Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
grub-efi installed or else your system won't boot any more. So, if you
have an EFI install, inst
On 10/11/2011 09:32 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> The main *BIG* difference is, that draft symlinks the extension
> *directory* and the script expects a install.rdf file below that.
> This means, the symlinking needs to happen one step below that, so that
> all files inside of the extension_id folder a
Thanks, and your welcome
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:07:11PM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> > Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
> > URM, Till
>
> Thank you for the report. I dug a little deeper and identified a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:07:11PM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
> URM, Till
Thank you for the report. I dug a little deeper and identified and fixed
the bug that was responsible for the multiple bug reports.
Kind regards
Till
Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011, 18:55:11 schrieb tim.laurid...@gmail.com:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >> > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discu
On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3
> > desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop.
> >
> > TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15 as it was not workin
Le dimanche 09 octobre 2011 à 13:28 +0200, Christoph Wickert a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01:
> > That just reminds me while packing firefox extensions is not a good idea.
>
> How else would you install an extension globally for all users?
Or automate the insta
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more proventesters/testers.
* One stop page for upda
Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
URM, Till
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> > I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there
> and
> > curren
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
> currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
> I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
>
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20:02:41, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> This is a bug in rpm's handling of %pretrans dependencies. I'll try to
> get it fixed tomorrow, BUT this also does point out a problem in the
> package:
>
> %pretrans scripts can almost never in real life be /bin/sh scripts,
> because o
On Tue, 11.10.11 03:38, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> [Unit]
> After=network.target
> Before=remote-fs-pre.target
> Wants=remote-fs-pre.target
>
> This should appear in F16 soon.
This is now waiting in bodhi.
Would be cool if you could check if this works as intended for yo
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 20:46 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > Well, I do. It seems pretty simple: we only have a few extensions
> > packaged. We should consider extensions to be effectively API
> > dependencies of Firefox, which means any Firefox update must also
> > include updates for the dependenc
On 10/11/2011 11:59 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>
>> rvm:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
>
> I'm reviewing this.
Done.
>>
>> In accordance with Fedora policy
>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_P
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:57:35 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200
> > Thomas Spura wrote:
> >
> > > It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated
> > > mozilla-noscript to the firefox update, whe
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:49:54AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There obviously is a _legitimate_ question as to whether you ought to be
> able to add your package into anyone else's update if you aren't a
> provenpackager; it's not necessarily something we'd want to do. But I
> think provenpac
Python 3.2's distutils was byte-compiling .py files to the wrong
location, putting the .pyc/.pyo files in the same directory as the .py
files, rather than in the __pycache__ subdirectory.
This has led to some python3 packages having duplicate .pyc files in
their payloads:
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:01:00 -0400
David Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Spura
> wrote:
> > The automatic requires proposed in bug #745038, does this:
> >
> > Requires: firefox >= 3.0
> > Requires: firefox <= 10.0a1
> >
> > and seems to work fine h
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:21:03 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
>>>
Heya,
I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a m
> rvm:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
I'm reviewing this.
>
> In accordance with Fedora policy
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package),
> I am posting here, and asking for help in re-reviewing
>
>> Hello all,
>> I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid
>> F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more
>> attention.
>
> If I can get 0.6.2 to build, I'll take it.
I did. Anyone interested in having pida 0.6.2 would be welcome to review
the
On 10/11/2011 11:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
>>> Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
/bin/sh is needed by groff-base
On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
>> Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
>>> Running Transaction Check
>>> ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
>>> /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
>>
>> I have this same problem whe
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200
> Thomas Spura wrote:
>
> > It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated
> > mozilla-noscript to the firefox update, when I notice, that the new
> > firefox upadate in testing breaks it.
> >
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 11:14 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 05:28, Christoph Wickert
> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01:
> >> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
> >> wrote:
> >> > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:34 +0200
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 13:16 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >
> > > 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
> > > extensions are still compatible?
> >
>
On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3
> desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop.
>
> TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15 as it was not working
> on the updated F14. It worked on F14 before the updat
On 10/11/2011 01:42 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> These are all needed for coda. Last I looked at them, getting them building
> properly was not so hard, getting them to run properly was a significant
> effort,
> one that may not be worth it, unless there are way more coda users out there
> than I'm a
I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3
desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop.
TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15 as it was not working on
the updated F14. It worked on F14 before the update. I installed two servers
using PXE using it.
TFTP
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 13:24 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
> three retired packages:
>
> lwp:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
I had a few spare minutes today, so I reviewed and approved this one.
signatu
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
> three retired packages:
>
> lwp:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
>
> rpc2:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
>
> rvm:
In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
three retired packages:
lwp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
rpc2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
rvm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
In accordance with Fedora pol
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:22:34 +0300, TL (Tomi) wrote:
> Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
> > Running Transaction Check
> > ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
> > /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
>
> I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide. I
> no
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
> Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
> > Running Transaction Check
> > ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
> > /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
>
> I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide.
Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
> Running Transaction Check
> ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
> /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide. I
noticed that groff-base package have 2 /bin/sh as dependency, is there
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:45:17 -0500
Nathan O. wrote:
> If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide.
> The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking
> at the SPEC
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master
Apparently, you
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:21:03 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
> >
> >> Heya,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
> >> virtual
> >> machine. Onl
On 10/11/2011 10:36 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
>>> If the required updates are due to version checks in the extensions,
>>> it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency generator that
>>> checks these and outputs the appropriate Requires/Confli
> Hello all,
> I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid
> F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more
> attention.
If I can get 0.6.2 to build, I'll take it.
-J
> -AdamM
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide.
> The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking at the
> SPEC
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master
There's no
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:36:01 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > > If the required updates are due to version checks in the
> > > extensions, it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency
> > > generator that checks these and outputs the appropri
If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide.
The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking at the
SPEC
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 201
Hello all,
I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid
F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more
attention.
-AdamM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Nathan O. wrote:
> I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
> currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
> I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
> problem is t
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
> currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
> I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
> prob
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
problem is that the URM(Upstream release monitoring) keeps opening a ne
Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > If the required updates are due to version checks in the extensions,
> > it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency generator that
> > checks these and outputs the appropriate Requires/Conflicts lines,
> > such that this could be easily ca
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 10.10.11 15:58, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 10.10.11 15:13, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >
>> >> /var/tmp/yum-ric
On 11 October 2011 14:34, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> Am 11.10.2011 15:20, schrieb Aaron Gray:
> > Thanks, still needs TFTP but this could simplify things a lot.
>
> If you want to circumvent using TFTP and you are using gPXE (or a PXE
> boot ROM that supports booting from HTTP) you could point it to
Am 11.10.2011 15:20, schrieb Aaron Gray:
> Thanks, still needs TFTP but this could simplify things a lot.
If you want to circumvent using TFTP and you are using gPXE (or a PXE
boot ROM that supports booting from HTTP) you could point it to the
pxelinux of boot.fedoraproject.org at
http://alt.fedor
On 11 October 2011 13:51, Arun SAG wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
>> >Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE
>> environment on another >machine rather than from the internet (
>> download.fedora.redhat.com) ?
>>
>>
> Yes , It i
Compose started at Tue Oct 11 08:16:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE
> environment on another >machine rather than from the internet (
> download.fedora.redhat.com) ?
>
>
Yes , It is possible. You can make the installation tree available v
On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
>
>> Heya,
>>
>> I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
>> virtual
>> machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else.
>
> And no /bin/sh either?
perl-Bio-Graphics has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
On i386:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Pe
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE
environment on another machine rather than from the internet (
download.fedora.redhat.com) ?
Many thanks,
Aaron
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> > On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> >
> > > So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
> > > anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
> virtual
> machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else.
And no /bin/sh either? It is provided by "bash".
> ERROR with transaction check vs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744904
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Heya,
I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
virtual
machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else.
Here is some info:
#
[root@dhcp201-139 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 16 (Verne)
[
68 matches
Mail list logo
