Hmm seems like there is either a spammer or an non-spam account's user has
got a virus or so.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, nayan kumar wrote:
> .Do you want to be a sex-machine?
> http://lelunapark.com/com.friend.php?xID=37si9
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http
On Tue, 11.10.11 00:03, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> But anyway, I am aware that not all daemons are netlink aware and we
> need to support that daemons like that and making them more dynamic is
> not realistic in the short term. So what we could do is introduce a new
> targe
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
>> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
>> wine *requires* PA 1.0 to
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Short question:
> > PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
> > According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
> > layer that emulates the Windo
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> > On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> >
> > > So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
> > > anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744946
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=527335&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Am 10.10.2011 23:52, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> systemd guarantees you that 0.0.0.0 and 127.0.0.1 are always bindable
> (and the IPv6 equivalents, too). To ensure this we'll actually configure
> the loopback device very very early at boot already
thank you for the information
this can relax
On Wed, 05.10.11 09:55, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > The more complicated conversion is the gfs2 script. This has been used
> > > historically to mount gfs2 filesystems (rather than using the system
> > > scripts for this). I assume that under the new systemd regime it shou
On Mon, 10.10.11 23:06, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.10.2011 20:27, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > Unless really necessary please drop After=network.target. Applications
> > that just bind on 0.0.0.0 don't need to synchronize on the network.
>
> more general as que
Am 10.10.2011 20:27, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> Unless really necessary please drop After=network.target. Applications
> that just bind on 0.0.0.0 don't need to synchronize on the network.
more general as question to the topic:
how we do know exactly if they really bind to 0.0.0.0 if the use
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
>
> > So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
> > anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable directly
> > like it was without the forced period in updates-testin
On Mon, 10.10.11 15:58, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10.10.11 15:13, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/adobe-linux-i386
> >> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744551
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Wed, 05.10.11 09:18, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in
> > that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld
> > start,
>
> Hum..
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 10.10.11 15:13, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/adobe-linux-i386
>> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/adobe-linux-i386/packages
>> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/fe
On Mon, 10.10.11 15:13, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/adobe-linux-i386
> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/adobe-linux-i386/packages
> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/fedora
> /var/tmp/yum-richard-R_0cAQ/x86_64/15/fedora/packages
> /va
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 13:11 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.6-3.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.6.1-9.fc17
> gcc-python2-plugin-0.6-3.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.6.1-9.fc17
> gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.6-3.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.6.1-9.fc17
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 08.10.11 16:01, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> > What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload
>> > the chart somewhere so I can see
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Although the branch for rawhide was once named devel, the naming of this
> as devel does not limit its topic to people running rawhide or the
> software
> versions and packages in the rawhide branch. This list is about
> development
> of Fedora. If Thomas were asking for
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 20:27 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 10.10.11 22:33, Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
Hi Lennart,
>
> Hope this helps,
It certainly does :) I shall make the changes you pointed out.
>
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproje
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
>> hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
>> Amazon, RackSpace, Linode, Tata, ID
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:30:19 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
> > extensions are still compatible?
>
> Anyone with a FAS account can pull updates from updates-testing and
> pro
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> I don't think we can dismiss the ability to have Fedora run on the
> hyerpvisor that powers (by most accounts) 80% of the public clouds.
> Amazon, RackSpace, Linode, Tata, IDCF, and virtually every other major
> compute cloud services
On Mon, 10.10.11 22:33, Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've written these service files for deluge. Could someone please review
> them and tell me what corrections I need to do here?
>
> http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluged.service
I am not a big fan o
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
> removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
> about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
> criterion read:
>
> The re
On 10/10/2011 11:40 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On the bright side, I don't see how AutoQA could help in this situation
> so my answer isn't "that's the job of AutoQA". On the down side, I
> don't really have any good answers on how to improve the situation.
>
> How do we encourage people to use updates
Since the beta criterion for running Fedora as a Xen guest (DomU) was
removed for Fedora 16, there has been some discussion [1] [2] on test@
about whether or not we should add it back for Fedora 16 final. The old
criterion read:
The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situatio
Am 10.10.2011 18:03, schrieb Peter Gueckel:
> This is the devel list, not the general list. Sorry.
...which doesn't solve the problem either. Sorry.
Regards,
--
Vinzenz Vietzke
Fedora Events Ninja / Coordination German L10N Team
Mail: viet...@b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 8
On Sat, 08.10.11 16:01, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload
> > the chart somewhere so I can see what's going on. Thanks,
>
> Here's my bootchart link before maki
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-10)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 17:01:11 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-10/fesco.2011-10-10-17.01.log.html
Meeting summary
--
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
> anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable directly
> like it was without the forced period in updates-testing or a heads up
> before doing such an update.
I thi
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200
Thomas Spura wrote:
> It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated
> mozilla-noscript to the firefox update, when I notice, that the new
> firefox upadate in testing breaks it.
> Otherwise, firefox is pushed to stable more faster, than
> mozilla
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all extensions
> are still compatible?
Anyone with a FAS account can pull updates from updates-testing and
provide karma to those updates. Karma giving isn't limited to th
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
> > extensions are still compatible?
>
> The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases provided for
>
Hi folks,
I've written these service files for deluge. Could someone please review
them and tell me what corrections I need to do here?
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluged.service
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluge-webui.service
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "Francisc
ack to both.
On 10/10/2011 09:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-d
Updated NSS in Rawhide to the upstream's NSS_3_13_RC0 and with it NSPR to
NSPR_4.9_BETA3.
The bug fixes in NSPR 4.9 BETA3 and NSS 3.18 RC0 can be found by these Bugzilla
queries:
For nspr:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&resolution=FIXED&classification=Components&qu
On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
> wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA
> 1.0 as a post install
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:03:34AM -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Thomas Spura wrote:
>
> >> So, why are you using devel?
> >
> > This happened on F-15.
> >
>
> This is the devel list, not the general list. Sorry.
>
Although the branch for rawhide was once named devel, the naming of this as
dev
From d39d500dadf640ac47f04370e9bb7b18e9bab9aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:46:34 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Change referential integrity to be a betxnpostoperation plugin
This changes referential integrity to be a betxnpostoperation plugin
Note: this d
Thomas Spura wrote:
>> So, why are you using devel?
>
> This happened on F-15.
>
This is the devel list, not the general list. Sorry.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:41:43 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 03:33 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial
> >
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:07:17 -0600
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
>
> > Yeah sometimes is okay of course. Happening every two or three weeks
> > it isn't.
>
> So, why are you using devel?
>
This happened on F-15.
-Tom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> Here's my bootchart link before making any modifications:
>>>
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/boot.png
>>
>> Here's after addi
Compose started at Mon Oct 10 08:16:15 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
perl-Bio-Graphics has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
On i386:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Pe
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 12:19 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> I don't doubt it's btrfs, but bootchart will tell me which one of our
>> kernel threads is running so I can tell_what_ in btrfs is taking it's
>> sweet time. Thanks,
>
> Here you go:
> http
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload
>>> the chart somewhere so I can see what's going on. Thanks,
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:18 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in
> > that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld
> > start,
>
> Hum...
>
> Co
Hello,
there is currently ongoing rebase of gmp package in f17-gmp dist tag
targeting rawhide.
Because of this, we have to rebuild all dependencies twice (at first
with compatibility package, then without it).
All packages depending on gmp can be found here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/att
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update pro
52 matches
Mail list logo
