WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting
WHEN: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 08:00 PDT)
WHERE: #fedora-meeting
It's meeting time again! Tomorrow's a public holiday in Canada so I'll
be off, but if someone else can host the meeting that'd be great.
If anyone has anything to add to the agenda, please reply to this mail,
an
Am 09.10.2011 21:28, schrieb Heiko Adams:
> Why don't you blame *mozilla* to make it possible to easily install
> and manage extensions centralized?
I do, but doing so doesn't get package maintainers out of duty.
We (Fedora) are responsible for working packages and if upstream is
messing up, we ha
On 10/10/2011 03:33 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial packages.
>>
>> Sometimes unavoidable due to security issues
>
> Why was
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
>
> >
> > I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial packages.
>
> Sometimes unavoidable due to security issues
Why was it unavoidable with Firefox? Afaik updated Fire
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:28:45PM +0200, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Why don't you blame *mozilla* to make it possible to easily install
> and manage extensions centralized? This would IMHO be the best way for
> all because it makes packaging extensions allmost unnecessary.
Using the same logic you sho
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:20:56 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> I already gave a reason why we should maintain these packages as RPM,
> but unfortunately you have trimmed that part of my mail: There is no way
> to install and manage extensions globally for all users on a computer.
There is also no
Dne 9.10.2011 20:31, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
> This is about installing extensions, not about actually *managing* them.
>
> There are several manual steps involved here (download, extract, look up
> app-id, create folder, copy to folder, register) and by *managing*
> something efficiently I me
Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
> Yeah sometimes is okay of course. Happening every two or three weeks
> it isn't.
So, why are you using devel?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 09.10.2011 21:09, schrieb Vinzenz Vietzke:
> Am 09.10.2011 19:40, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>>> I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial
>>> packages.
>> Sometimes unavoidable due to security issues
>
> Yeah *sometimes* is okay of
Am 09.10.2011 19:40, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>> I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial packages.
> Sometimes unavoidable due to security issues
Yeah *sometimes* is okay of course. Happening every two or three weeks
it isn't.
Regards,
--
Vinzenz Vietzke
Fedora Events Ninja / Co
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:59 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> problem is that the packaged extensions for FF/TB are NOT
> updated as rapidly they should, but this is not a problem
> of firefox itself
No, but it's a problem of Fedora and we should address it instead of
just throwing it over th
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:14 -0600 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 05:28, Christoph Wickert
> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01:
> >> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
> >> wrote:
> >> > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:3
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 19:15 +0200 schrieb Matej Cepl:
> Dne 9.10.2011 18:20, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
>
> > I already gave a reason why we should maintain these packages as RPM,
> > but unfortunately you have trimmed that part of my mail: There is no way
> > to install and manage extensio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
>
> I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial packages.
Sometimes unavoidable due to security issues
Rahul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Usin
Am 08.10.2011 23:43, schrieb Christoph Wickert:
> Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora
> is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable
> release and breaks Firefox horribly:
> * My favorite extensions (and actually the only thing that
Am 09.10.2011 12:50, schrieb Christoph Wickert:
>> Which extensions are you talking about? The ones I use never caused an
>> such issues.
>
> For example mozilla-adblockplus or chatzilla, also German language packs
> or dictionaries.
use adblockplus from the mozilla-extensions page
works fine w
Dne 9.10.2011 18:20, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
> I'm afraid I don't understand your question. What blue icon?
I thought there is some kind of Fedora fascism in play ("Unless it is
packaged by Fedora community, it is no good."). I was apparently wrong.
> I already gave a reason why we should m
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 05:28, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01:
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
>> wrote:
>> > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:34 +0200 schrieb drago01:
>> >> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christoph Wickert
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 17:56 +0200 schrieb Matej Cepl:
> Dne 8.10.2011 23:43, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
> >* My favorite extensions (and actually the only thing that keeps
> > me using FF) stop working. In the last 7 weeks I had to pitch in
> > three times and upda
Dne 8.10.2011 23:43, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
>* My favorite extensions (and actually the only thing that keeps
> me using FF) stop working. In the last 7 weeks I had to pitch in
> three times and update packages to get things working again.
> Sometimes there
Is it just an oversight that an 8.3 build of grubby wasn't done for rawhide?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Sun Oct 9 08:15:29 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:34 +0200 schrieb drago01:
> >> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christoph Wickert
> >> wrote:
> >> > Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid re
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
> > extensions are still compatible?
>
> The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases provided for
> u
Am Samstag, den 08.10.2011, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 08.10.2011 23:43, schrieb Christoph Wickert:
> > Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora
> > is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable
> > release and breaks Firefox hor
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:34 +0200 schrieb drago01:
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christoph Wickert
>> wrote:
>> > Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora
>> > is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 11:34 +0200 schrieb drago01:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christoph Wickert
> wrote:
> > Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora
> > is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable
> > release and breaks Firefox
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora
> is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable
> release and breaks Firefox horribly:
> * My favorite extensions (and actually the only t
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all extensions
> are still compatible?
The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases provided for
updates, because there is an test case to check for extensi
W dniu 08.10.2011 23:43, Christoph Wickert pisze:
> Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora
> is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable
> release and breaks Firefox horribly:
> * My favorite extensions (and actually the only thing tha
W dniu 07.10.2011 17:23, Reindl Harald pisze:
> hi
>
> i have two machines with the same USB3 card and massive problems
> with two different external disks - should this be a bugreport for
> the kernel? i am wondering about this troubles because AFAIK the
> linux-kernel was first with support for
31 matches
Mail list logo