On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:37 AM, John5342 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom "Spot" Ca
Hi,
Today's yum update on Fedora 14 resulted in about 10 seconds long 100% CPU load
on one of the cores
and an error in scriptlet:
Running Transaction
Updating : farsight2-0.0.22-1.fc14.x86_64
1/26
Updating : libcap-2.22-1.f
Tadej Janež wrote:
> What has changed between F-15 and F-16 so that "-rpath,/usr/lib64" gets
> appended to g++ options?
Looks like a regression somewhere, probably in sip (which also contains some
build-system-type stuff). Something needs fixing for multilib.
> What is the best way to fix this?
Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> I agree, provided you mean "not necessarily by each package's maintainer".
>
> In some cases, folks working on the common goal do need the assistance of
> the package maintainer. Alternatively, the package maintainer may be able
> to make the required changes in a timely mann
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
>
Hi,
Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this year (
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/232).
We are willing to help test
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 but find too little
information about test methods (
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticke
(to both cloud@ and devel@)
I was interested in a yum plugin to support S3, and discovered [1]this
forum post, where Seth and James basically gave their thumbs up. The
author (Robert Mela, even though he's not the original author either)
made it work and there was some feedback provided, which I i
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel
wrote:
> Related note. How about we also change the way we manage translations
> for packages?
>
> This gives more control over translations to translators also
> translators become independent from package maintainers and can reduce
>
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> commit ee88cf13670b752fc9fa94f39b1b2e2fe97849c3
> Author: Dan Horák
> Date: Fri Sep 9 19:30:19 2011 +0200
>
> fix build on other arches
>
> antlr3.spec | 15 +--
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> ---
> diff
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 18:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> As an alternative to downgrading glib2, one can also get a
> new evolution-data-server from koji:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=262721
>
A few more packages are affected (PackageKit, upower,...),
but they are all
I've grown entirely too fed up with the CRITPATH approval process.
Here's my Fedora FESCo TRAC ticket requesting that the issue be solved
and providing a suggested solution. If you agree, you might want to put
your +1 in the ticket. If you disagree because you think you have a
better solution, pl
Jens Petersen (peter...@redhat.com) said:
> yum-langpacks has been working pretty well now for a while in Fedora,
> but all langpacks are still listed conditionally in comps' language support
> groups
> in addition to the meta-section.
>
> So for F17 I'd like to remove them all from comps,
> th
Le ven. 09 sept. 2011 18:40:34 CEST, Kalev Lember a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its
> broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages.
>
> - gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already
>retired in F16+.
> - g
Hello,
In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its
broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages.
- gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already
retired in F16+.
- gnome-python2-gtkmozembed: needs xulrunner's gtkmozembed support
which i
Hi,
On 09/09/2011 06:31 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This took me some time to figure out, so I hope this mail
> will save others some grieve.
>
> After installing the glib2 update from todays updates-testing:
> glib2-2.29.90-1.fc16.x86_64
>
> The following happens:
> [hans@shalem gspca]$ ld
Hi,
This took me some time to figure out, so I hope this mail
will save others some grieve.
After installing the glib2 update from todays updates-testing:
glib2-2.29.90-1.fc16.x86_64
The following happens:
[hans@shalem gspca]$ ldd -r /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
linux-vdso.so.1 (0
Hi,
2011/9/7 Pavel Lisy :
> Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 20:27 +0200:
>> 2011/9/6 Itamar Reis Peixoto :
>> > 2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski :
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
>> >> getting an error
>> >> DEBUG util.py:250: cheroke
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
wrote:
> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
>> files and shipping them.
>>
>> Your work did not go unoti
Compose started at Fri Sep 9 08:15:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
Compose started at Fri Sep 9 08:15:35 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires libstdair.so.0.36
airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires lib
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> I don't think a maintainer can realistically replace wide-spread user
>> based testing in a variety of environments.
>
> I didn't argue that this would be the case, but rather that pers
Hi all!
A quick announcement that we've done a major upgrade on Transifex.net, which
brings a few exciting features for Fedora's developers and translators,
including a brand-new theme. Some of these were advocated by the Fedora
community itself, so thank you for your feedback!
http://blog.tran
Sorry, you are mixing two things:
1) One is testing environment and it can be probably well defined,
clean, etc.
2) The other thing is maintainer mindset. You can try to convince
yourself to take a different look but I doubt it will work. It reminds
me like if you do patch review of your patch
On 08/09/11 12:23, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:52:38PM +1000, Michael Fleming wrote:
>> On 7/09/2011 4:50 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Khusro Jaleel wrote:
On 06/09/11 06:31, Michael Fleming wrote:
> I've released ownership of t
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I don't think a maintainer can realistically replace wide-spread user
> based testing in a variety of environments.
I didn't argue that this would be the case, but rather that persons who
are developers/package maintainers can also wear a test
2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
> files and shipping them.
>
> Your work did not go unoticed!
I do agree in particular with respect to his labour to prov
27 matches
Mail list logo
