Re: Orphaning maradns

2011-09-06 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Khusro Jaleel wrote: > On 06/09/11 06:31, Michael Fleming wrote: > > > > I've released ownership of the aforementioned package, as I've not used > > it in any meaningful way in some time and don't have the time to > > maintain it further. > > > > Upstream d

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:04 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: What's wrong with quilt setup specname.spec >> >> Because rpmbuild segregates everything, quilt doesn't seem to know how >> to ha

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-06 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:38:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > > > minority, and AFAIK the cur

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:02:25 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that > maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However, > this seems to be happening - ex

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > > minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that > > maintainers cannot upkarma updates

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:04 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > >> What's wrong with > >> > >> quilt setup specname.spec > > Because rpmbuild segregates everything, quilt doesn't seem to know how > to handle that. > > When you create the directory tree for r

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-06 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:09:03PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Peter Hutterer > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > >> minority, and AFAIK the current

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the >> minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that >> maintainers cannot upkarma updates they

Re: submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-06 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the > minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that > maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However, > this seems to be happening

submitters +1ing their own packages

2011-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However, this seems to be happening - exhibit a): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-7.fc1

X clipboard behaviour/patch verification

2011-09-06 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. I'd be grateful if someone versed in the finer aspects of X clipboard handling could take a quick look at the patch attached to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667541 and tell me whether it looks sane. Thanks! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedo

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

2011-09-06 Thread Jef Spaleta
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Well, yes, that parallel came up in my mind too, but really, the two > aren't particularly similar. I don't think there's any intent to > obfuscate in the case of the glibc spec, it's simply done the way that > seemed convenient to its main

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

2011-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 20:56 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 09/03/2011 07:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > To look at things at a higher level: it's clearly the goal of the > > guidelines that any interested party (with sufficient basic knowledge) > > who comes along and checks a Fedora packa

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd

2011-09-06 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Tuesday, September 6, 2011, 5:28:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: >> There is one thing I have learned ( so far in the conversion process ) >> and that is that the current model surrounding maintainers and >> maintainership followed by various policies surrounding that m

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd

2011-09-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > There is one thing I have learned ( so far in the conversion process ) > and that is that the current model surrounding maintainers and > maintainership followed by various policies surrounding that model which > we use here in Fedora as in maintainers "Own" their com

Re: How to debug X lockup (advice from gurus wanted)

2011-09-06 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 09/06/2011 01:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 06.09.2011 13:10, schrieb Adam Jackson: >> On 9/1/11 5:05 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> >>> Hmmm, turning off SMP is not realistic, as this laptop has a Core 2 Duo. >> >> Sure it is. Boot with maxcpus=1 on the kernel command line > > i would rec

[perl-Package-Stash] Created tag perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.fc17

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.fc17' was created pointing to: 1a294d2... Update to 0.32 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev

[perl-Package-Stash] Created tag perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.fc16

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.fc16' was created pointing to: 1a294d2... Update to 0.32 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev

[perl-Package-Stash] Created tag perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.el6

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.32-1.el6' was created pointing to: 1a294d2... Update to 0.32 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve

[perl-Package-Stash] Created tag perl-Package-Stash-0.31-1.fc17

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.31-1.fc17' was created pointing to: 29b6aed... Update to 0.31 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev

[perl-Package-Stash] Created tag perl-Package-Stash-0.31-1.fc16

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.31-1.fc16' was created pointing to: 29b6aed... Update to 0.31 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I think I've gotten over the first hurdle. I ended up using the > following command: > > $ quilt setup -d rpmbuild/BUILD --sourcedir rpmbuild/SOURCES/ > rpmbuild/SPECS/.spec Well not so fast... I don't know why, but even though I'm telling it

[perl-Package-Stash/el6] (3 commits) ...Update to 0.32

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: af968d1... Perl mass rebuild (*) 29b6aed... Update to 0.31 (*) 1a294d2... Update to 0.32 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl

[perl-Package-Stash/f16] Update to 0.32

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: 1a294d2... Update to 0.32 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
I think I've gotten over the first hurdle. I ended up using the following command: $ quilt setup -d rpmbuild/BUILD --sourcedir rpmbuild/SOURCES/ rpmbuild/SPECS/.spec Now that doesn't fix the persistence issue since anything in BUILD/ will be deleted on the next run of rpmbuild... In this case 'pa

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: >> Dne 6.9.2011 16:29, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to get it to integrate with rpmbuild. > > Please mind your quotes, I did

[perl-Package-Stash] Update to 0.32

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 1a294d28ce820abeef16899d3dbb70a3cec87b74 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Tue Sep 6 20:29:32 2011 +0100 Update to 0.32 - New upstream release 0.32 - Bring the behavior of has_symbol for nonexistant scalars into line with the XS version - Invalid package names

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Enrico Scholz
Richard Shaw writes: > I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to > get it to integrate with rpmbuild. I use an %apply macro in ways like | %apply -n4 -p1 which is equivalent to | %patch4 -p1 on ordinary hosts. But defining this macro as | %apply(p:n:b:)

Re: Did gtkhtml2 package disappear?

2011-09-06 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/06/2011 01:49 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:00:21 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote: > >> I guess what I really need is gnome-python2-gtkhtml2, has this >> been replaced? > > What I could find is a request to drop it (it's a > g

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 09/06/2011 09:53 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 6.9.2011 16:29, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): >>> I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to >>> get it to integrate with rpmbuild. Please mind your quotes, I didn't write the above. > What's wrong with > > quilt setup specna

File Package-Stash-XS-0.25.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Stash-XS: 52ece18842c46da8fb7a4a14dea910ab Package-Stash-XS-0.25.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 6.9.2011 16:29, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): >> I like the idea of quilt but I can't seem to find the magic recipe to >> get it to integrate with rpmbuild. What's wrong with quilt setup specname.spec ? Best, Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/6 Itamar Reis Peixoto : > 2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski : >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm >> getting an error >> DEBUG util.py:250:  cherokee >> ## >> DEBUG util.py:250:  error: unpacking of archive

Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/6 Dan Horák : > Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 19:02 +0200: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm >> getting an error >> DEBUG util.py:250:  cherokee >> ## >> DEBUG util.py:250:  error: unp

[389-devel] Please Review: (735114) renaming a managed entry does not update mepmanagedby

2011-09-06 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735114 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=521730&action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Did gtkhtml2 package disappear?

2011-09-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:00:21 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote: > I guess what I really need is gnome-python2-gtkhtml2, has this been > replaced? What I could find is a request to drop it (it's a gnome-python2-extras subpackage): Disable Python bindings for gtkhtml2 (dead package) https://bugzilla.

Re: Did gtkhtml2 package disappear?

2011-09-06 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/06/2011 09:41 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:34:32 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote: > >> policycoreutils has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On >> x86_64: policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64 requires >> gtkhtml2 On i

Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski : > Hi, > > I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm > getting an error > DEBUG util.py:250:  cherokee > ## > DEBUG util.py:250:  error: unpacking of archive failed on file > /builddir/build/SOURCE

Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Dan Horák
Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 19:02 +0200: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm > getting an error > DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee > ## > DEBUG util.py:250: error: unpacking of archive failed on

howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm getting an error DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee ## DEBUG util.py:250: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/01-drop-privileges.patch;4e664eb5: cpio: M

F-16 Branched report: 20110906 changes

2011-09-06 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Sep 6 13:15:27 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
Thanks for the suggestions so far. I think quilt works ok with Fedora scm (or RPM Fusion cvs) since everything lives in one directory. I'm trying to get it to place nice with rpmbuild because not everything I'm working on is in Fedora or RPM Fusion. Also, I like to use rpmbuild as kind of a sandb

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 09:16 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all > that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with > that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream > (which is a good thing!) bu

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:16:44AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all > that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with > that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream > (which is a good thi

Re: How to debug X lockup (advice from gurus wanted)

2011-09-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.09.2011 13:10, schrieb Adam Jackson: > On 9/1/11 5:05 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > >> Hmmm, turning off SMP is not realistic, as this laptop has a Core 2 Duo. > > Sure it is. Boot with maxcpus=1 on the kernel command line i would recommend "nosmp" because it really disables the kernel-sm

Re: php-pear package build problem

2011-09-06 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/06/2011 07:00 PM +9:00: > 05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote: >> First: >> * php-devel is not installed when trying to package srpm from spec and >> sources. This is >> what koji (build server) always does. i.e. koji tries to package srpm first,

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Štěpán Kasal

2011-09-06 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Nicola Soranzo wrote: > I'm following the procedure at: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > Does anyone know how to contact Štěpán Kasal (user kasal)? He is not > answering > e-mails at his listed address (

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Richard Shaw wrote: > Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all > that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with > that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream > (which is a good thing!) but that also me

Re: Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 09/06/2011 05:16 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all > that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with > that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream > (which is a good thing!) but that also

Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Štěpán Kasal

2011-09-06 Thread Nicola Soranzo
I'm following the procedure at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Does anyone know how to contact Štěpán Kasal (user kasal)? He is not answering e-mails at his listed address (I've written directly to ka...@ucw.cz on 2011/07/27 regarding bug 700405) or t

Best practices for patch management on RPM based packages?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream (which is a good thing!) but that also means that the patches need frequent adjustment. I

Re: Did gtkhtml2 package disappear?

2011-09-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:34:32 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote: > policycoreutils has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gtkhtml2 > On i386: > policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.i686 requires gtkhtml2 > Please resolve this as

Did gtkhtml2 package disappear?

2011-09-06 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 policycoreutils has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gtkhtml2 On i386: policycoreutils-gui-2.1.5-2.fc17.i686 requires gtkhtml2 Please resolve this as soon as possible.

Re: Orphaning maradns

2011-09-06 Thread Khusro Jaleel
On 06/09/11 06:31, Michael Fleming wrote: > > I've released ownership of the aforementioned package, as I've not used > it in any meaningful way in some time and don't have the time to > maintain it further. > > Upstream development seems to have picked up of late (was dormant for a > long time) so

rawhide report: 20110906 changes

2011-09-06 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Sep 6 08:15:03 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd

2011-09-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/06/2011 08:39 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > I created a service for wpa_supplicant. Is there something wrong with it? Nope Dan had sanctioned it but then another one appear upstream and as you know we try to avoid deviating from upstream. Not sure if Bill spoke with Dan about this ( I ass

Re: How to debug X lockup (advice from gurus wanted)

2011-09-06 Thread Adam Jackson
On 9/1/11 5:05 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Hmmm, turning off SMP is not realistic, as this laptop has a Core 2 Duo. Sure it is. Boot with maxcpus=1 on the kernel command line. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: php-pear package build problem

2011-09-06 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote: (Well, as you posted your first mail to fedora devel list, please keep sending your reply also to devel list. This type of private mails will be very confusing to many people who are also watching mailing list because they cannot know what is currently

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/9/6 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > On 09/06/2011 02:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said: >>> the alpha was release and >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd >>> is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which

Graphics Test Week this week

2011-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
Sorry for the short notice everyone, but this week is Graphics Test Week again. It's time to make sure the major graphics drivers are in shape for Fedora 16. Tomorrow, 2011-09-06, is Nouveau Test Day [1]. Wednesday, 2011-09-07, is Radeon Test Day [2]. And Thursday, 2011-09-08, is Intel graphics Tes