Re: php-pear package build problem

2011-09-04 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/05/2011 03:59 AM +9:00: > Hello. > > I have couple of bugs with FBFS similar to [1]. At first glance it is trivial > - php-config doesn't found [2]. > > But what interesting, it still there as was in Fedora 15: > [pasha@vbox temp]$ repoquery --whatpr

Re: Orphaned: vpnc

2011-09-04 Thread Christian Krause
Hi David, On 08/31/2011 09:37 AM, Woodhouse, David wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 02:42 +0200, Christian Krause wrote: >> I have looked at the list of open bugs for vpnc and it looks like that >> there are a couple of packaging issues, some problems with the >> vpnc-script and some other issues w

Re: Bundle question

2011-09-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
> Hello. > > I'm review jreen library and there found [1] very interesting issue - > psi and kdenetwork bundle iris, jdns [2] and simplesasl. > > For example: > $ find kdenetwork-4.6.5 psi-0.14 -iname simplesasl\* > kdenetwork-4.6.5/kopete/protocols/jabber/libiris/iris/xmpp/xmpp-core/simplesasl.h

php-pear package build problem

2011-09-04 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
Hello. I have couple of bugs with FBFS similar to [1]. At first glance it is trivial - php-config doesn't found [2]. But what interesting, it still there as was in Fedora 15: [pasha@vbox temp]$ repoquery --whatprovides '*/php-config' php-devel-0:5.3.6-2.fc15.i686 [pasha@vbox temp]$ repoquery -

Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes

2011-09-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:31:21 +0200 Thomas Spura wrote: > Some i686 updates make it to the broken deps for x86_64, others > don't... > > Why that? This is multilib. Basically packages that have a -devel subpackage have that devel subpackage and it's requirements (if available) shipped in the 64bi

Non responsive maintainer : gouldwp

2011-09-04 Thread Remi Collet
Hi, It seems gouldwp is non-responsive. User: gouldwp, Name: None, email: w...@gouldfamily.org, Creation: 2008-01-19, Status: active Approved Groups: cla_fpca cla_fedora fedorabugs cla_done packager Bug (open 2011-08-06, ping 2011-08-25) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728665 Direct

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd

2011-09-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.09.2011 02:20, schrieb Tom Lane: > Kevin Kofler writes: >> Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 07:46, Reindl Harald >>> wrote: How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb in the distribution exist until the OS can be called as "clean" like be

F-16 Branched report: 20110904 changes

2011-09-04 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Sep 4 13:15:51 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)

Re: Review swap request: moonscript, lua-alt-getopt, lua-inotify

2011-09-04 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
I'm ready to swap on any from my packages awaiting review. I going to reviewing now. 24.08.2011 00:58, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Dear contributors, > > Is anyone interested in some review swaps? These packages should be > quite straightforward: > > moonscript -- moonscript is to Lua what cof

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd

2011-09-04 Thread Marcos Mello
Reindl Harald thelounge.net> writes: > > the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd > is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which > should have been done for F15 > > How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb in t

Re: emacs and libotf.so.0

2011-09-04 Thread Amit Saha
Hi, On 09/05/2011 12:59 AM, Denis Arnaud wrote: > Hello, > > I just came onto a tricky dependency issue, and thought it could be of > interest to the list. > emacs requires libotf.so.0, which is the library handling Open Type > Fonts (OTF), provided by the libotf package. > Well, fine enough. But

emacs and libotf.so.0

2011-09-04 Thread Denis Arnaud
Hello, I just came onto a tricky dependency issue, and thought it could be of interest to the list. emacs requires libotf.so.0, which is the library handling Open Type Fonts (OTF), provided by the libotf package. Well, fine enough. But libotf.so.0 is also provided by the OpenMPI package (not in /u

rawhide report: 20110904 changes

2011-09-04 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Sep 4 08:15:02 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear

Re: What is "Error: Protected multilib versions: ..."?

2011-09-04 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Richard W.M. Jones writes: glibc-common-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-common-2.14.90-1.x86_64 This means that rpm/yum aborted in a middle of a upgrade. You should clean this up using rpm -e glibc-common-2.14.90-1.x86_64 pgpf62s8f7GEk.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lis

Re: What is "Error: Protected multilib versions: ..."?

2011-09-04 Thread Niels de Vos
And now to the list as well... On 4 Sep 2011 10:01, "Niels de Vos" wrote: > On 4 Sep 2011 09:45, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: >> >> I get this error all the time, but I can't find a coherent explanation >> for what it means. >> >> What is the precise meaning of the "protected multilib versions" er

What is "Error: Protected multilib versions: ..."?

2011-09-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I get this error all the time, but I can't find a coherent explanation for what it means. What is the precise meaning of the "protected multilib versions" error? # yum install /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [...] Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 != glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64 # yum insta

Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes

2011-09-04 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:37:37 + Rawhide Report wrote: > Broken deps for x86_64 > -- > FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires > libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires > libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-