On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:29:31PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:38:43 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
> >
> >> > cd %{buildroot}%{libdir}
> >> > ldconfig -n $(pwd)
> >> > ln -s %{name}.so.? %{name}.so
> >> > cd -
>
**IMPORTANT** : The next Fedora 16 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting is in less
than 24 hours - Wednesday, August 17, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00
PDT) so the Alpha test cases (see below) would need to be done by then.
Thanks.
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 5
(RC5) i
Hey, folks. Just a quick heads-up to expect F16 Alpha RC5 within the
next hour or two. We have the go/no-go meeting (again) tomorrow so we're
really squeezed for time in validating this, if people could help out
with testing that'd be great. The official announcement on test-announce
will have all
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I have a package in the F16 branch (copied from F15) that ended up
>> having a dependency issue with the boost libraries. I have rebuilt the
>> package for F16 to take care of this but
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I have a package in the F16 branch (copied from F15) that ended up
> having a dependency issue with the boost libraries. I have rebuilt the
> package for F16 to take care of this but I couldn't find anything on
> the wiki[1] to tell me if I sh
I have a package in the F16 branch (copied from F15) that ended up
having a dependency issue with the boost libraries. I have rebuilt the
package for F16 to take care of this but I couldn't find anything on
the wiki[1] to tell me if I should force the update into stable to
solve the issue or let it
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:38:43 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
>
>> > cd %{buildroot}%{libdir}
>> > ldconfig -n $(pwd)
>> > ln -s %{name}.so.? %{name}.so
>> > cd -
>>
>> Wouldn't that create a symlink of a symlink?
>
> That isn't a problem, is i
On 08/16/2011 08:34 PM, Zaniyah wrote:
> At the moment the mrepo package is deprecated in fedora-devel. I would
> like to take this package on. I have already got it building and
> functioning correctly for EPEL6, and was about to submit the fixes
> upstream when I discovered it was orphaned and
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.9.6. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.9
testing and bugs from earlier releases.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.1, the 389-ds-base package is included in the base
OS. It is the same as the upstream,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:38:43 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
> > cd %{buildroot}%{libdir}
> > ldconfig -n $(pwd)
> > ln -s %{name}.so.? %{name}.so
> > cd -
>
> Wouldn't that create a symlink of a symlink?
That isn't a problem, is it? All that matters is that the final symlink would
point at a usable
perl-Shipwright has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Shipwright-2.4.24-2.fc16.noarch requires perl(that)
On i386:
perl-Shipwright-2.4.24-2.fc16.noarch requires perl(that)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedorapro
2011/8/15 Ulrich Telle :
> Hi Domingo,
>
>> I would like to package wxPdfDocument [1], a class library for
>> creating PDF documents in a C++ application.
>>
>> As I use it in production environments since 2009 with no problems, I
>> would like to package it for Fedora in order to have it available
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:16:59 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
>
>> >> Or perhaps you only need to run "ldconfig -n ..." to add missing symlinks?
>>
>> Gave it a shot. It does create the soname symlink but does not create
>> a plain .so symlink
Compose started at Tue Aug 16 13:15:36 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
Summary of changes:
2f98567... initial import (rhbz#730041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
2f98567... initial import (rhbz#730041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:16:59 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
> >> Or perhaps you only need to run "ldconfig -n ..." to add missing symlinks?
>
> Gave it a shot. It does create the soname symlink but does not create
> a plain .so symlink for the -devel sub-package, so I still have to
> create that manu
Summary of changes:
2f98567... initial import (rhbz#730041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
commit 2f985673277fe18e98a7c9b6f4559ef4b82e3c89
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Aug 16 17:30:06 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#730041)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Date-JD.spec | 59 +
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 61
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Date-JD:
bdfe53aaa6c119dd3cfae0f477458e24 Date-JD-0.005.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires
perl()
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires
perl()
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.20-3.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.20-3.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as possibl
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as po
perl-Eval-LineNumbers has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible
Summary of changes:
6483dfc... initial import (rhbz#730040) (*)
875b02b... drop explicit BR perl >= 0:5.006 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de
Summary of changes:
6483dfc... initial import (rhbz#730040) (*)
875b02b... drop explicit BR perl >= 0:5.006 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de
Summary of changes:
6483dfc... initial import (rhbz#730040) (*)
875b02b... drop explicit BR perl >= 0:5.006 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de
commit 875b02b687d8374471099fd838ed509d027e68ed
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Aug 16 17:22:16 2011 +0200
drop explicit BR perl >= 0:5.006
perl-Date-ISO8601.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Date-ISO8601.spec b/perl-Date-ISO8601.spec
commit 6483dfcaa4086301fb6fccf6f261650de2c73269
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Aug 16 17:21:51 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#730040)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Date-ISO8601.spec | 63
sources|1 +
3 files c
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Date-ISO8601:
e8efa8355310f95605f8f7f399ecb5e0 Date-ISO8601-0.004.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Summary of changes:
9c2123a... initial import (rhbz#730033) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729504
--- Comment #14 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2011-08-16
11:16:51 EDT ---
The following packages have already been built for EPEL6:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>> Or perhaps you only need to run "ldconfig -n ..." to add missing symlinks?
Gave it a shot. It does create the soname symlink but does not create
a plain .so symlink for the -de
Summary of changes:
7b64348... initial import (rhbz#730034) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
7b64348... initial import (rhbz#730034) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
7b64348... initial import (rhbz#730034) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
commit 7b643480aaae22f7132b1a92c45f1e5fa6d96487
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Aug 16 17:13:21 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#730034)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-autobox-List-Util.spec | 46 +++
sources |1 +
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-autobox-List-Util:
b7e1d41601c306483b6125fab69d9d1f autobox-List-Util-20090629.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
Summary of changes:
596ff5d... initial import (rhbz#730037) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
596ff5d... initial import (rhbz#730037) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:18:54 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
>
>> I'm working on a small library that uses a very simple makefile (no
>> autoconf, etc.) and it sets the library name and soname within the
>> makefile.
>>
>> Instead of hard codi
Summary of changes:
596ff5d... initial import (rhbz#730037) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
commit 596ff5de496e4245dc128d71a472d64772de1c2d
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Aug 16 17:08:51 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#730037)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-autovivification.spec | 59
sources|1 +
3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-autovivification:
ef96ee3912ec2d47938b2dcb55e96b4b autovivification-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:18:54 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
> I'm working on a small library that uses a very simple makefile (no
> autoconf, etc.) and it sets the library name and soname within the
> makefile.
>
> Instead of hard coding it in the spec file I would like to extract the
> library name
At the moment the mrepo package is deprecated in fedora-devel. I would
like to take this package on. I have already got it building and
functioning correctly for EPEL6, and was about to submit the fixes
upstream when I discovered it was orphaned and deprecated.
Jess
--
devel mailing list
devel
Summary of changes:
9c2123a... initial import (rhbz#730033) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
9c2123a... initial import (rhbz#730033) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
commit 9c2123aef923bd0b09a3691c80fce2342bd95562
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Aug 16 16:54:07 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#730033)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-autobox-dump.spec | 45 +
sources|1 +
3 files chan
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-autobox-dump:
22e22e1e7ce53846446979032f786573 autobox-dump-20090426.1746.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On 08/01/2011 07:15 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 12:25 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 31.07.2011 12:17, schrieb David Woodhouse:
>>> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
IIRC connman (i.e. NM's competition) can do the ARP magic, too.
>>> I don't th
commit 97c1b997168c793ee93f70e214c020fefe1be482
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Aug 16 16:23:58 2011 +0200
0.31 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Business-CreditCard.spec | 31 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 20 inse
commit 2ea330aa415b5a23b9f0dc1ed26c73dc15347384
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Aug 15 09:28:08 2011 +0200
Revert "Retire perl-Business-CreditCard."
This reverts commit 487c05652a418ba20f445f53a46a940d97eec3ac.
dead.package |1 -
perl-Business-CreditCard.spec |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Business-CreditCard:
d074980f40c5790e76de4374aeee4d3c Business-CreditCard-0.31.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
Summary of changes:
459e377... change path on vendor, so our debuginfo are not conflicting (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
Package perl-Business-CreditCard in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Business-CreditCard
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@li
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Richard Shaw writes:
>
>> I was hoping something like "make -p ..." would work but it doesn't
>> evaluate the variables, which seems useless since if I just wanted
>> the raw output 'cat' would work.
>
> $ make -f Makefile -f - <<<'echo-foo
Summary of changes:
24e37a0... change path on vendor, so our debuginfo are not conflicting (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
commit d5deedeef9b8658a632d2289d62113895b6fa28e
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Tue Aug 16 15:35:48 2011 +0200
Add missing BR
perl-Text-VimColor.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-VimColor.spec b/perl-Text-VimColor.spec
index 3913e67
Richard Shaw writes:
> I was hoping something like "make -p ..." would work but it doesn't
> evaluated the variables, which seems useless since if I just wanted
> the raw output 'cat' would work.
$ make -f Makefile -f - <<<'echo-foo:; @echo $(foo)' echo-foo
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on a small library that uses a very simple makefile (no
> autoconf, etc.) and it sets the library name and soname within the
> makefile.
>
> Instead of hard coding it in the spec file I would like to extract the
> library name and
I'm working on a small library that uses a very simple makefile (no
autoconf, etc.) and it sets the library name and soname within the
makefile.
Instead of hard coding it in the spec file I would like to extract the
library name and soname from the makefile.
I tried "grep soname Makefile | awk...
glusterfs is a clustering file system consisting of a management
daemon and one or more instances of servers for each 'brick' in the
cluster. hekafs is an add-on for glusterfs that adds cloud attributes
such as multi-tenancy, encryption, and authentication.
I suppose the first question is do w
Symptoms: Ogg files created from FLAC files using GStreamer contain stream
errors, which either make them refuse to play in some devices or result
in tiny interruptions during playback. Sometimes it isn't obvious that a
file is corrupted, especially not if one doesn't listen to the file from
start
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 18:50 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should configs files of a package be patched to have settings that
> make it work more or less out of the box (as far as possible, some
> setting like DB access etc. just can't be filled in in advance)?
If possible and does not really n
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:02:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 09:41:17PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 08:36:00AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > On 7/25/11 8:31 AM, Roman Rakus wrote:
> > > > On 07/25/2011 04:38 AM, W. Michael Petullo wrote
67 matches
Mail list logo
