On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:39:13
> From: Bill Nottingham
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (v3)
>
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again f
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=253031
* Fri Jul 15 2011 Doug Ledford - 3.2.2-5
- Merge rawhide mdadm to f15. Rawhide changelog preserved even though
- the referenced versions do not exist in f15, rawhide specific builds
- are from 3.2.1-1 through 3.2.2-4
FYI: works on my F1
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:11:43PM +0400, Lucas wrote:
> Dear All.
>
> Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
Thanks, I just reported this upstream.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Adam Williamson writes:
> [...]
>> > There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
>> > configure script inside and out,
>>
>> That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copy&paste
>> their configure.ac scripts together [...]
>
> Yeah, autotools stu
Sam Varshavchik writes:
> Well, I just don't have that impression. What I do find a bit hard to
> believe is that somebody else other than the package's developer group would
> be in a better position to decide the merits of adopting a policy of
> automatically rebuilding the code using whatev
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 18:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
> > configure script inside and out,
>
> That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copy&paste
> their configure.ac script
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-Alpha Blocker Review
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-15/f16-alpha-blocker.2011-07-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraprojec
Kevin Kofler writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
> configure script inside and out,
That's a very bold assertion. ;-)
I do not see anything particularly bold about it. This seems to me like a
reasonable statement.
On 07/15/2011 11:43 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
>> configure script inside and out,
>
> That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copy&paste
> their configure.ac scripts together fr
2011/7/12 Dario Lesca :
> Hi, how to I can read in safe mode, from bash, the content
> of /proc/locks?
>
> On my system I have more than 7000/9000 line into /proc/locks and if I
> read it with awk (or cat or grep or cp) the file change during the read
> and my input is undefined and is not processa
How to get AR5523 based wireless card working in Fedora 14?
Do I need to compile new drivers from source? Is firmware missing?
Is the best way to use windows drivers via ndiswrapper and just ignore
linux based drivers for now?
I found this page: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ar5523
Il giorno ven, 15/07/2011 alle 17.48 +0100, Dan Mills ha scritto:
> The thing is ANY processing is inherently going to be racy, at least
> some of the time.
>
> The way to find out of part of a file is locked, is to try to take the
> lock yourself (LOCK_NB as an argument to flock may be useful h
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> cmake CMakeLists.txt
FYI, that's the default file name, so:
cmake .
is sufficient. (You do have to give it a parameter, but the dot for the
current directory is sufficient.)
Also note that it's in general cleaner to build in a separate directory
(passing a relative path
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 18:21 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> If I try copy it (cp /proc/locks /tmp/l or cat /proc/locks>/tmp/l) two
> times in succession, the result is always very different and the
> abnormal line (more than 8 field) are like attachment of previous
> message.
The thing is ANY process
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Has to be said that cmake just replaces one set of stupid with another
> set of stupid. The world is still waiting for a build system that is
> widely available and doesn't suck.
What's "stupid" about CMake?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
> configure script inside and out,
That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copy&paste
their configure.ac scripts together from examples or other projects without
understanding t
Il giorno ven, 15/07/2011 alle 11.57 -0400, Przemek Klosowski ha
scritto:
>
> I can't think of anything to lock all the other processes on your
> system while your awk/cat is running, other than raising the priority
> of your process high enough.
>
> Perhaps if you explained what you are trying t
- Original Message -
> # F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
> # Date: 2011-07-15
> # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Just a reminder that the first Fedora 16 Alpha blocker bug review meeting
starts in under 1 hour
On 07/15/2011 05:26 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 12/07/2011 alle 14.13 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
>> Hi, how to I can read in safe mode, from bash, the content
>> of /proc/locks?
>>
>> On my system I have more than 7000/9000 line into /proc/locks and if I
>> read it with awk (or cat
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
>>> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
>>> found" errors. This happens when recursively included direct
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>
>> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
>> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
>> found" errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
>> %files are marked with trai
I've updated Rawhide's vamp-plugin-sdk to 2.2.1; its changelog just
lists build fixes for OS/X. As such I'd not be pushing it to the
stable branches, and maintainers shouldn't need to rebuild their
packages.
Packages with build dependencies on vamp-plugin-sdk-devel:
$ repoquery --archlist=src --r
Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
> found" errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
> %files are marked with trailing /, eg
>
> %{_included
FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
found" errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
%files are marked with trailing /, eg
%{_includedir}/mypkg works everywhere, but %{_
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:18 +1000, Brendan Jones wrote:
> I can take this on - I use HL7 extensively at work. I will send
> through
> mine for review shortly.
>
> regards,
>
> Brendan
>
>
Thanks! :D
--
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoin
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:41:50PM +0200, Alain Portal wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 11:16:18, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
> > 2011/7/15 Alain Portal :
> > > Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
> > >
> > >> What
> > >> git show-branch -a
> > >> says?
> > >
> > >
I would like to retire Armangil's podcatcher:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/podcatcher
There has not been a release since 2009 and I don't use it any more.
Should I just release ownership from pkgdb or follow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
On Fri, 15.07.11 12:11, Lucas (macach...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Dear All.
>
> Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
This is a kernel bug, please file a bug in rhbz against the kernel and
include this log fragment. Thanks!
> [ 37.653381] =
> [
> Orphan irda-utils
I've taken it. Comantainers welcome.
Dmitry Butskoy
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/7/14 Bill Nottingham :
>
> If not claimed, the packages will be blocked on Monday, July 25.
>
> Orphan man-pages-es
I've just took that one.
k.r.
Domingo Becker
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 11:16:18, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
> 2011/7/15 Alain Portal :
> > Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
> >
> >> What
> >> git show-branch -a
> >> says?
> >
> > Many things!
> > See the attached file.
>
> ! [origin/f15] Don't f
Il giorno mar, 12/07/2011 alle 14.13 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> Hi, how to I can read in safe mode, from bash, the content
> of /proc/locks?
>
> On my system I have more than 7000/9000 line into /proc/locks and if I
> read it with awk (or cat or grep or cp) the file change during the read
>
2011/7/15 Alain Portal :
> Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
>
>> What
>> git show-branch -a
>> says?
>
> Many things!
> See the attached file.
! [origin/f15] Don't forget the file...
>
>> Can you switch branch with git
>> git checkout f15
>> ?
>
> [ala
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
> What
> git show-branch -a
> says?
Many things!
See the attached file.
> Can you switch branch with git
> git checkout f15
> ?
[alain@phoenix kicad]$ git show-branch -a > show-branch.txt
[alain@phoenix kicad]$ git checkout f15
B
Alain Portal writes:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know why, but since several days, I'm unable to switch branch.
>
> [alain@phoenix git]$ rm -rf kicad
> [alain@phoenix git]$ fedpkg clone kicad
> Cloning into kicad...
> Enter passphrase for key '/home/alain/.ssh/id_rsa':
> remote: Counting objects: 498, done
Hi,
2011/7/15 Alain Portal :
> Hi,
>
> I don't know why, but since several days, I'm unable to switch branch.
>
> [alain@phoenix git]$ rm -rf kicad
> [alain@phoenix git]$ fedpkg clone kicad
> Cloning into kicad...
> Enter passphrase for key '/home/alain/.ssh/id_rsa':
> remote: Counting objects: 49
Hi,
I don't know why, but since several days, I'm unable to switch branch.
[alain@phoenix git]$ rm -rf kicad
[alain@phoenix git]$ fedpkg clone kicad
Cloning into kicad...
Enter passphrase for key '/home/alain/.ssh/id_rsa':
remote: Counting objects: 498, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2
Hi,
2011/7/15 Lucas :
> Dear All.
>
> Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
It looks like a kernel bug.
>
>
>
> [ 37.653381] =
> [ 37.654015] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> [ 37.654015] 3.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc16.i686 #1
> [
Dear All.
Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
[ 37.653381] =
[ 37.654015] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 37.654015] 3.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc16.i686 #1
[ 37.654015] -
[ 37.65401
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 03:20 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap
Please note that this has been updated since last week. It now includes
all of the information you need for "stage3" (current). Further, there
is an additional wiki p
Folks,
We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual
Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 15th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern
Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is to co-ordinate the
bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating point).
Last week, we succeeded in reaching
Hi,
I have just released ownership of avl. It was unsuccesful attempt to
build forked-daapd in Fedora. Its upstream maintainer is just too weird,
using the most weird libraries (including Grand Central Dispatch), and I
would spend my life maintaining it. Switched to ushare instead.
Matěj
--
42 matches
Mail list logo
