2011/7/6 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:25:56 +0200,
> "Joshua C." wrote:
>> I've been testing with grub and found an interesting problem. When I
>> install the package
>> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/71.fc15/x86_64/grub-0.97-71.fc15.x86_64.rpm
>> everythin
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 17:11 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That sounds like an excellent idea for a contribution! Remember, the
> > AutoQA project is explicitly designed to allow and indeed encourage
> > tests to be contributed - we would love
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:25:56 +0200,
"Joshua C." wrote:
> I've been testing with grub and found an interesting problem. When I
> install the package
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/71.fc15/x86_64/grub-0.97-71.fc15.x86_64.rpm
> everything is fine and grub works as it sho
Previous maintainer cvincent aparently didn't sign on the new CLA
in time, and the 2 packages are now orphaned for a week or so. So I
will take over, I already own the ACLs for those packages
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libcmpiutil
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
I've been testing with grub and found an interesting problem. When I
install the package
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/71.fc15/x86_64/grub-0.97-71.fc15.x86_64.rpm
everything is fine and grub works as it should:
[root@localhost x86_64-redhat]# grub
Probing devices to guess BI
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Google finds these:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/386
> ->
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-March/msg00010.html
Thanks. I remember reading that fedora-devel message, but somehow
concluded that I w
commit 7956d87dec5870634a605931b439ac134e6bb07a
Author: Xavier Bachelot
Date: Wed Jul 6 00:13:25 2011 +0200
update to 1.1
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-SVN-Bisect.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
di
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-SVN-Bisect:
a929a878b7bee04adae2e592770c0ea2 App-SVN-Bisect-1.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 07/05/2011 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That sounds like an excellent idea for a contribution! Remember, the
> AutoQA project is explicitly designed to allow and indeed encourage
> tests to be contributed - we would love it if the core AutoQA team
> worked mostly on the framework, and test
On 07/05/2011 03:46 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Some packagers do upload the detached sig and add it to the spec
> as another Source file URL.
Great! Except I haven't done so. I wasn't required to submit a signature
for my package nor does the Package Guildline pages refer to doing so.
Might b
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:32:42 -0600, JJ (Jerry) wrote:
> > You are a member of the Advanced Fedora Packager Group (aka
> > provenpackagers),
> > which made it possible for you to commit in git. Bodhi, however, doesn't
> > handle provenpackagers membership in the same way.
>
> Wow, my memory must b
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 05:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> I didn't see any suggestion that packages be *required* to have a
>> signature, only that we somehow run an automated check on one if there
>> is one.
>>
>> Rather than making specific Sour
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> You are a member of the Advanced Fedora Packager Group (aka provenpackagers),
> which made it possible for you to commit in git. Bodhi, however, doesn't
> handle provenpackagers membership in the same way.
Wow, my memory must be worse tha
W dniu 5 lipca 2011 21:13 użytkownik nodata napisał:
> On 05/07/11 21:11, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting eCryptfs recently on F15?
>>> It seems to me unlikely
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 20:57:33 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:41:31 -0600, JJ (Jerry) wrote:
>
> > I recently asked the givaro maintainer, D Haley (CCed), for
> > permission to become comaintainer, so I can push out a coordinated
> > update of givaro and linbox. I received a
On 05/07/11 21:11, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting eCryptfs recently on F15?
>> It seems to me unlikely that I have an I/O errors on few disks.
>> Especially if only e
Hi,
W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> Hi,
>
> Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting eCryptfs recently on F15?
> It seems to me unlikely that I have an I/O errors on few disks.
> Especially if only eCryptfs reports them.
>
I've got two dirs
/home/s1 - ex
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:41:31 -0600, JJ (Jerry) wrote:
> I recently asked the givaro maintainer, D Haley (CCed), for permission
> to become comaintainer, so I can push out a coordinated update of
> givaro and linbox. I received a reply stating that this had been done
> in pkgdb. Today I built new
On 07/03/2011 11:36 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Kevin Kofler writes:
>
>> And in addition, I consider the concept of including generated files in
>> what's supposed to be a source tarball to be broken by design. A source
>> tarball is supposed to contain SOURCE code, not generated code. Anything
>
On Tue, 05.07.11 20:36, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> > > We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
> > > are tagged so we can use them as systemd devices. Dan Berrange thinks
> > > the right incantation is to add:
> > >
> > > SUBSYSTEM=="virtio-p
I recently asked the givaro maintainer, D Haley (CCed), for permission
to become comaintainer, so I can push out a coordinated update of
givaro and linbox. I received a reply stating that this had been done
in pkgdb. Today I built new givaro and linbox versions for Rawhide.
I would also like to p
On Tue, 05.07.11 16:54, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:47:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > [Is there a Fedora-specific systemd list? Not that I can find.]
> >
> > We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
>
commit 6cb9f317774c3f46510ae965296215bf396c933b
Author: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Tue Jul 5 19:55:17 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Server-SS-PreFork.spec | 56 +++
sources |1 +
3
commit c31401ce2b103de2f5d5e1910f86924c573b22c6
Author: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Tue Jul 5 19:44:59 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Server-SS-PreFork.spec | 56 +++
sources |1 +
3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Server-SS-PreFork:
4198d48d27353f60cc297178f86c216f Net-Server-SS-PreFork-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
On 07/05/2011 05:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I didn't see any suggestion that packages be *required* to have a
> signature, only that we somehow run an automated check on one if there
> is one.
>
> Rather than making specific Source numbers special case, why not just go
> on naming? The con
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511349&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511349&action=edit
Thanks,
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 11:13 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:27 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 07/04/2011 10:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > It would be nice if we could upload/commit the .asc or .sig file, and
> > > have the rpmbuild script
> > > automatically c
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:27 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> In the mean time, perhaps AutoQA could have a check added against the
> source checksum?
That sounds like an excellent idea for a contribution! Remember, the
AutoQA project is explicitly designed to allow and indeed encourage
tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719048
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2011-07-05
12:23:21 EDT ---
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.44-1.fc15 has been submitted as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719048
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2011-07-05
12:23:32 EDT ---
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.44-1.fc14 has been submitted as
Le 04/07/2011 05:42, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>> Could you help me for this problem also ?
> I can take a look at it, but probably not for a few days.
Ok thanks, the file is difficult to find because the upstream web site
is not u
2011/7/4 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> Excerpts from Michał Piotrowski's message of Mon Jul 04 13:11:06 +0200 2011:
>> Unfortunately I do not have enough java programming experience to help
>> you in fixing problems.
>
> There might be a more simple way to do it though. There was already a
> started luc
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:47:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> [Is there a Fedora-specific systemd list? Not that I can find.]
>
> We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
> are tagged so we can use them as systemd devices. Dan Berrange thinks
> the right inca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719056
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511339&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
[Is there a Fedora-specific systemd list? Not that I can find.]
We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
are tagged so we can use them as systemd devices. Dan Berrange thinks
the right incantation is to add:
SUBSYSTEM=="virtio-ports", TAG+="systemd"
to /lib/udev/ru
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Minh Ngo wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719002
>
you will have it soon :-)
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
+55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
+55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
+55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
+55 34 3221 8
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:42:57 -0400, NB (Neal) wrote:
> 0. F15 x86_64
> 1. yumdownloader --source atlas
> 2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
> error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
> chkconfig
>
> How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedo
On 05/07/11 13:42, Neal Becker wrote:
> 0. F15 x86_64
> 1. yumdownloader --source atlas
> 2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
> error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
> chkconfig
>
> How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedora build is OK?
B
commit 9ab194bf113d263ec0396c4ff896b6684536c749
Author: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Tue Jul 5 14:47:43 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.spec | 51 ++
sources |1 +
0. F15 x86_64
1. yumdownloader --source atlas
2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
chkconfig
How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedora build is OK?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On 07/05/2011 10:40 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Minh Ngo wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would suggest adding qt-sql-ibase driver to the Fedora repository.
>> This driver provides the InterBase/FireBird plugin for Qt 4. The patch
>> for the spec
>> file:https://raw.github.
Compose started at Tue Jul 5 08:15:20 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-12
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:01:15 +0200, AS (Andreas) wrote:
> > The uploaded tarball checksum enters the "sources" file in git, and any
> > tarball downloaded from the lookaside cache MUST match that checksum.
> > Else it wouldn't be downloaded and used. Source RPM build in koji would
> > fail.
>
> T
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:27 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 10:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > It would be nice if we could upload/commit the .asc or .sig file, and have
> > the rpmbuild script
> > automatically check the tar ball.
>
> Hm, yes. It would be nice to see Koji suppor
Michael Schwendt writes:
> The uploaded tarball checksum enters the "sources" file in git, and any
> tarball downloaded from the lookaside cache MUST match that checksum.
> Else it wouldn't be downloaded and used. Source RPM build in koji would
> fail.
That won't help if the tarball is already d
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:53:38 -0400 (EDT), PW (Paul) wrote:
> It would be nice if we could upload/commit the .asc or .sig file, and have
> the rpmbuild script
> automatically check the tar ball.
Some packagers do upload the detached sig and add it to the spec
as another Source file URL.
The uplo
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Minh Ngo wrote:
> Hi,
> I would suggest adding qt-sql-ibase driver to the Fedora repository.
> This driver provides the InterBase/FireBird plugin for Qt 4. The patch
> for the spec
> file:https://raw.github.com/Ignotus/spec-files/e35c5f95b72b63f7f51b7ae4cfc4e06fc3d
Hi,
I would suggest adding qt-sql-ibase driver to the Fedora repository.
This driver provides the InterBase/FireBird plugin for Qt 4. The patch
for the spec
file:https://raw.github.com/Ignotus/spec-files/e35c5f95b72b63f7f51b7ae4cfc4e06fc3d62d97/sqlibase.patch
Regards,
--
Minh [ignotus] Ngo
Kiev,
49 matches
Mail list logo
