Dne 17.6.2011 14:01, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> I'm following the procedure at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
> e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
Hi Matt,
I just want to note that your script is not listing the package owners
correctly. There should be listed only people who have commit access,
but there are listed also people who just watch bugzilla and commits,
[1] for example. Unfortunately nobody of listed owners:
rubygem-rack-1.1.0
Very appreciate it, thanks a lot, Tim!
Hurry
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 21:52 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:45:14 +0200
> From: "tim.laurid...@gmail.com"
> Subject: Re: Package Review Needed
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
- Original Message -
> > i want to relinquish ownership. Any takers for package stardict.
>
> Though not offically a comaintainer, Jens has been active on it
> recently and might be a good candidate.
Well ok, I have picked it up for now, but someone else wants
to help comaintain or own it
[CC-ed to Matej Cepl, marked in PkgDB as a co-maintainer.]
Hello, all.
I've just orphaned scribes. Its related package, scribes-templates, is
already orphaned from previously. I no longer use them and have no
interest in maintaining them.
If you'd like to take them, please note that the 0.3 seri
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must
Hi all,
I created a new review request ( yad program -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150)
This is my first package. So, if possible, could someone sponsor me?
Best Regards,
--
Elder Marco
GNU/Linux User: #471180
"Contra o positivismo, que pára perante os fenômenos e diz: 'Há
Thanks Damian,and I will update my package this evening.
---
年艳川
基础软件事业本部 技术服务部
中科方德软件有限公司（基础软件国家工程研究中心）
北京海淀区中关村南四街4号
Mail: yanch...@nfs-chin
> You are of course free to do this if you choose, but Fedora is a
> package managed system. Doing this you lose a number of benefits of a
> package management system.
For me the most important benefit is OS independent software, especially
web browser.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:28:50 +0400
Lucas wrote:
> To All
>
> I do not understand what are talking about.
>
> Firefox and Thunderbird now does not require any kind of linux
> distribution attention.
>
> Download bz2 archive from their site, unpack it to any directory (for
> example - /usr/local
To All
I do not understand what are talking about.
Firefox and Thunderbird now does not require any kind of linux distribution
attention.
Download bz2 archive from their site, unpack it to any directory (for example -
/usr/local/share)
and start it.
It will use USER settings in home director
Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 13:25 -0300 schrieb Evandro Giovanini:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Christoph Wickert
> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> >> Felix Miata wrote:
> >> > FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream
>
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 08:43 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> I just checked again.
> - autoreconf does not seem to make a difference
> - ./autogen.sh is enough to remove rpaths, --disable-rpath is not needed
> anymore.
> If running ./autogen.sh is preferred to chrpath, then I think this
> should be
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>> > FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream
>> > versioning policy change.
>>
>> The funny thing is that Firefox is going e
Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Felix Miata wrote:
> > FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream
> > versioning policy change.
>
> The funny thing is that Firefox is going exactly the opposite way of us with
> their update policies,
T
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:08:31 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Felix Miata wrote:
> > FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an
> > upstream versioning policy change.
>
> The funny thing is that Firefox is going exactly the opposite way of
> us with their update policies, and that a
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 13:56 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>> currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a
>>> local rpm build.
> I'll note here that _removing_ rpath completely breaks gnome-shell.
It would also break a large number of perl-dependent p
Felix Miata wrote:
> FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream
> versioning policy change.
The funny thing is that Firefox is going exactly the opposite way of us with
their update policies, and that as a result, that Firefox security update is
not compliant with our
(From digest - I have since switched digest off so I generate threaded
responses)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:39:20 +0100
From: Damian L Brasher
Subject: Self Introduction
>>Yanchuan wrote:
>>
>>Thanks to someone who will review my first package.
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
Hi devel friends
Im looking for a reviewer for Openshift Express Client Tools:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716469
:) thank u in advance
Gomix
--
Ing.Guillermo Gomez S.
Fedora Board Member A4
http://gomix.fedora-ve.org
http://www.neotechgw.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Compose started at Sun Jun 26 08:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadmsslutil.so.1()(64bit)
389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadminutil.so.1()(64bit)
acheck-0.5.1-
21 matches
Mail list logo
