On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 01:33:49AM +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Matt Domsch wrote:
> > ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-9.fc16 (build/make) mathstuf,haskell-sig
>
> Jens opened another bug for this[1]. Should I mark as CLOSED DUPLICATE
> or set a dependency?
CLOSED DUPLICATE is right in this instance, as the b
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:41 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2011/6/24 Tomas Mraz :
> > Yes, I completely agree. What Gregory tries to emphasis here - as I
> > understand it, of course he might have a different intention - is purely
> > politics and I do not think, that Fedora should involve in polit
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:11 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
> > how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
> > from an (insecure) software simu
Matt Domsch wrote:
> ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-9.fc16 (build/make) mathstuf,haskell-sig
Jens opened another bug for this[1]. Should I mark as CLOSED DUPLICATE
or set a dependency?
> metapost-metauml-0.2.5-6.fc12 (build/make) mathstuf
I can't spell. postnu -> postun. Fixed[2].
--Ben
[1]https://bugzil
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:15 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:09:22 -0400
> Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 22:21 +0200, nodata wrote:
> > > 2. This seems like Trusted Computing, which got shot down in flames.
> >
> > Who shot it and why ?
> >
> > > Does TrustedB
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 05:16:12PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> and compiling it. In this case, -z relro on its own will not help: the
> address of the 'exit' function isn't known until it's first called,
> because function resolution is normally done lazily, and because the
> 'exit' symbol is
On 6/24/11 3:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I don't think GHC generates C (it used to, a very long time ago). GHC
> and OCaml contain code generators that generate machine code directly.
>
> So this could require changes to the code generator, but at least for
> RELRO it seems this is just a
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:09:22 -0400
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 22:21 +0200, nodata wrote:
> > 2. This seems like Trusted Computing, which got shot down in flames.
>
> Who shot it and why ?
>
> > Does TrustedBoot go against the core values of Fedora?
>
> Only if it is not under us
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 22:21 +0200, nodata wrote:
> 2. This seems like Trusted Computing, which got shot down in flames.
Who shot it and why ?
> Does TrustedBoot go against the core values of Fedora?
Only if it is not under user control, otherwise it is a very useful
feature.
Simo.
--
Simo Sor
Two questions:
1. Can you please add some information to the feature page? I can't tell
what TrustedBoot is and how it works.
2. This seems like Trusted Computing, which got shot down in flames.
Does TrustedBoot go against the core values of Fedora?
nd
On 22/06/11 21:02, Matthew Garrett wrote
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
> Surely whatever northbridge code is required can be free software,
> Is this just security through obscurity?
The purpose of the blob is to "measure" the system state; onl
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:19:51PM +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
> I can take kbibtex.
>
Done.
-Toshio
pgpC4NtEUSZxO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:50:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> espeak
>
jskarvad had already taken this. I've made you a comaintainer.
> flite
> HippoDraw
Done.
>
> olpcsound
>
>
> This package has long been dead and I thought it had been killed. It looks
> like
> it o
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:12:01AM +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 03:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > xerces-c
>
> I can take xerces-c if its current owner doesn't sign the FPCA. I sent a
> personal mail to jrobie yesterday but no reply so far.
>
Done.
Toshio
pgph4ctHKyfi6.pgp
Des
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, He Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:00 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0800
>> From: He Rui
>> Subject: Package Review Needed
>> To: devel
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> Greetings!
On 06/24/2011 11:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 09:55 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote
>> Rahul,
>>
>> Seems he is using references to support contentions...like a scholarly
>> journal article. With respect, just as you are free to criticize on
>> these mailing lists, he is free to speak on
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:37:34AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:17 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> > using rawhide from 2011-06-16
> >
> > Good hunting!
> >
> > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildR
As of today (24 June 2011), Fedora 13 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 13. A previous reminder was sent on June
12th [0].
Fedora 14 will continue to receive updates until approximately one
month after
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 09:43 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> 2011/6/24 Tomas Mraz :
> > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:10 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Gregory Maxwell
> >> wrote:
> >> > If trusted boot in fedora is widely deployed, then $random_things may
> >> > d
On 06/24/2011 05:15 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> * Bug 716267 - mock 1.1.11 moves to build step even if buildroot had
> depsolving problems.
I'm looking into this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616626
Bug 616626 depends on bug 616399, which changed state.
Bug 616399 Summary: python-pip pkg conflict with perl-pip
https://bugzill
On 06/24/2011 09:55 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote
> Rahul,
>
> Seems he is using references to support contentions...like a scholarly
> journal article. With respect, just as you are free to criticize on
> these mailing lists, he is free to speak on them as long as he follows
> proper netiquette.
T
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:17 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
>
> Good hunting!
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> pypy-1.5-1.fc16 (build/make) dmalcolm,tomspur
I don't see a dire
On 06/24/2011 03:15 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
>> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
>
> As a reminder, please do not simply "CLOSED NOTABUG" your FTBFS bugs.
> By the time I started mass-f
On 06/24/2011 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 12:55 PM, JB wrote:
>> JB gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing
>>
>> TC is controversial because it is technically possible not just to secure the
>> hardware for its owner, but also to secure against
On 06/24/2011 03:24 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> If you have *specific* concerns, let's hear those. You seem to just
>> quoting parts of a public wiki page anyone can read. I don't see the
>> point of that
>
> If trusted boot in fedora
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
As a reminder, please do not simply "CLOSED NOTABUG" your FTBFS bugs.
By the time I started mass-filing 564 bugs yesterday, any packages I
filed bugs
Andrew Haley wrote:
> What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
> Surely whatever northbridge code is required can be free software,
> Is this just security through obscurity?
That's a good question. I get the impression that Sinit (as the blob seems to
be called) is fro
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:05:52PM +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 of June 2011 19:17:45 Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> > using rawhide from 2011-06-16
> >
> > Good hunting!
> >
> > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixB
2011/6/24 Tomas Mraz :
> On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:10 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> > If trusted boot in fedora is widely deployed, then $random_things may
>> > demand I use a particular fedora kernel in order to access them.
>>
>> I can
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:49:18 -0700,
Eric Smith wrote:
> On 06/23/2011 06:38 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > The sirius project web page has vanished and I haven't been able to find
> > a new one. Should I comment out the old URL and source0 definitions
> > and have source0 just be the arch
Hi,
I am still in the process of becoming a packager, but for one of my hobbies
I am working on an overhaul of the the popular Xournal software package.
This project of mine is dependent on clutter-gtkmm.
However the current version in the repository for f14/f15 has a major bug,
preventing all pro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716174
--- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar 2011-06-24 09:30:35 EDT ---
Created attachment 509759
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachme
> i want to relinquish ownership. Any takers for package stardict.
Though not offically a comaintainer, Jens has been active on it recently
and might be a good candidate.
-J
> Thanks & regards
> Naveen Kumar
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject
Le Mar 21 juin 2011 01:49, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> If you're so worried about the dependency logic, why not just update the
> package and *remove* the incomplete or incorrect dependency statements
> entirely, and thereby cause systemd to fall back on the numeric
> ordering?
Because you have
On Wednesday 22 of June 2011 19:17:45 Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
>
> Good hunting!
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
...
> Total packages: 10614
> Number failed to build: 603
> Numbe
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>>> I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
>>> how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
>>> from an (insecure) software s
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>> I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
>> how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
>> from an (insecure) software simulation of the same from a remote
>> viewer's perspecti
On 06/24/2011 05:38 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> His point is rather obvious really not sure why you're picking on him
> - many may be unfamiliar with this and he spent time finding out and
> sharing what others, who have thought about this topic, have to say.
I am not picking on anyone but quot
commit 522b1f1c44091443e3dd1f1941c9d3ad5176caa7
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 24 14:10:30 2011 +0200
clean spec, comment BR on XML::LibXML, use filter on *.so
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec | 13 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-L
On 06/24/2011 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 12:55 PM, JB wrote:
>> JB gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing
>>
>> TC is controversial because it is technically possible not just to secure the
>> hardware for its owner, but also to secure against
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:
bdbeb47ee3fa872199b6da97d1eb6ac3 Fedora-Rebuild-v0.4.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On 23/06/11 16:21, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 23/06/11 15:53, Karel Zak wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709351
>>
>> The tools (not only df(1)) have to be fixed to de-duplicate the list
>> of fileststems. It's standard behavior that the same filesystem could
>> be mounted on m
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:00 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0800
> From: He Rui
> Subject: Package Review Needed
> To: devel
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Greetings!
>
>
> Could someone please review the following ticket?
ckermit was removed from Fedora in the FC6 timeframe due to the license
not being truly open source. Fortunately the license has now changed to
BSD, so it should be acceptable in Fedora once again. I've submitted a
package for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716402
--
dev
On 06/23/2011 06:38 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The sirius project web page has vanished and I haven't been able to find
> a new one. Should I comment out the old URL and source0 definitions
> and have source0 just be the archive name?
>
> Other than needing a DSO linking fix, the game seems to w
What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
Surely whatever northbridge code is required can be free software,
Is this just security through obscurity?
Andrew.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:43:32AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Karel Zak writes:
>
> > The 'bind' flag is another way how to achieve that the filesystem is
> > mounted on another place. Nothing other.
Pedantic note, there are some extra features usable with MS_BIND,
like MS_UNBINDABLE, MS_R
2011/6/24 Tomas Mraz :
> Yes, I completely agree. What Gregory tries to emphasis here - as I
> understand it, of course he might have a different intention - is purely
> politics and I do not think, that Fedora should involve in political
> decisions in one way or another.
Frankly, I view the DRM
commit 5239ecc63873310f468098926b0931227396c89b
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Jun 24 10:37:45 2011 +0100
Spec clean-up
- Nobody else likes macros for commands
- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
- Drop buildroot definition and cleaning
- Drop redundant defattr
commit e85a4a2eb0961228a140445ba5bc5425200c1e56
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Jun 24 09:54:39 2011 +0100
Update to 0.09
- New upstream release 0.09
- Better tests, use of LANG
- Compile time check for at least one speller
- Update dictionary path patch
- Drop t
fre 2011-06-24 klockan 10:01 +0100 skrev Camilo Mesias:
> I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
> how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
> from an (insecure) software simulation of the same from a remote
> viewer's perspective.
Add anot
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:10 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > If trusted boot in fedora is widely deployed, then $random_things may
> > demand I use a particular fedora kernel in order to access them.
>
> I can't see how it would make any
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> I don't know
> how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
> from an (insecure) software simulation of the same from a remote
> viewer's perspective.
The attestation is signed by a key that cannot be extracted from th
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
> how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
> from an (insecure) software simulation of the same from a remote
> viewer's perspective. Als
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> If trusted boot in fedora is widely deployed, then $random_things may
> demand I use a particular fedora kernel in order to access them.
I can't see how it would make any difference whether Fedora supports
the feature or not - after all,
commit ea7fb4636f81f7951eb82f2be30d622f966ec5ae
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 24 11:05:09 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Class-MethodMaker.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-MethodMaker.spec b/perl-Class-MethodMaker
commit be7cecc83b109e77abc1a191952f2335744d43bc
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 24 11:05:10 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Module-Signature.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Signature.spec b/perl-Module-Signature.sp
commit 29b6e6027aef0d4aa94d61155ae374deb0109837
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 24 11:05:08 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Crypt-GPG.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-GPG.spec b/perl-Crypt-GPG.spec
index 6516212..16a
commit bb39e8561722f0285d259f13d8e8ab88f7dd3cc3
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 24 11:05:08 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Test-Expect.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Expect.spec b/perl-Test-Expect.spec
index 3c231b
commit e58b62f4bde824b99ea7510dff0c16acedd7ce3b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 24 11:05:08 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-In
commit f111310b554d5456062f72342297b5bc71b0b05c
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Fri Jun 24 11:05:08 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-GraphViz.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-GraphViz.spec b/perl-GraphViz.spec
index d2f7d52..d1c6d2
I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
from an (insecure) software simulation of the same from a remote
viewer's perspective. Also I don't see how it would be used in the
world of servers where virtua
i want to relinquish ownership. Any takers for package stardict.
Thanks & regards
Naveen Kumar
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> rstrode took over gdm and gnome-screensaver this morning.
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:39:28PM -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:24:08AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Excellent. Let me know. We're plannin
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> If you have *specific* concerns, let's hear those. You seem to just
> quoting parts of a public wiki page anyone can read. I don't see the
> point of that
If trusted boot in fedora is widely deployed, then $random_things may
demand I use
I can take kbibtex.
Robin
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:53:47PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> > Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of
>> >
On 06/24/2011 12:55 PM, JB wrote:
> JB gmail.com> writes:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing
>
> TC is controversial because it is technically possible not just to secure the
> hardware for its owner, but also to secure against its owner. Such controversy
> has led opponents of tru
Karel Zak writes:
> The 'bind' flag is another way how to achieve that the filesystem is
> mounted on another place. Nothing other.
>
># mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/A
># mount --bind /mnt/A /mnt/B
>
> is the same thing as:
>
># mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/A
># mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/B
There is
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:21:36PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I played briefly with jamming relro into ghc command line options, and
> you can kind of do it ("-optl-z -optlrelro -optlc-Wl,z,relro" in
> ghc-options), but it doesn't change much on its own. You do end up with
> an executable with a
JB gmail.com> writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing
TC is controversial because it is technically possible not just to secure the
hardware for its owner, but also to secure against its owner. Such controversy
has led opponents of trusted computing, such as Richard Stallman, to r
On 06/23/2011 09:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:22 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
> wrote:
>> To fix [1] and [2] dependency rebuild required.
>> Scratch build successful [3], if someone can help on it, I'm ready
>> commit and push changes in git.
>> Rebuild for
72 matches
Mail list logo
