Sorry for the late notice, though I did trail this a bit last week.
Tomorrow we're having a special Test Day, out of the usual Test Day
cycle (which will open for F16 in a few weeks), for World IPv6 Day.
Special thanks to Linda Wang for getting the ball rolling on this. You
can find the event page
Greetings. I'm Michael, a Ph.D student in human-computer interaction at
the University of Minnesota researching recommender systems (and working
on an open source recommender toolkit). In my spare time I engage in
recreational OCaml hacking (and use it whenever I can in my research
work as well).
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must
Sorry for the late mail here. I seem to have not mailed this last
week. ;(
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-06-01)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
On 06/07/2011 06:37 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is converting
> the following in the spec file:
>
> BuildRequires: qt-devel
>
> into a dependency on the qt3-devel rpm, which is wrong. There is a qt-devel
> for qt4 available. Why isn
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:45, John5342 wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:37, William Cohen wrote:
>
>> I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is
>> converting the following in the spec file:
>>
>> BuildRequires: qt-devel
>>
>> into a dependency on the qt3-devel rpm, whi
On 06/07/2011 05:37 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> Any suggestions on tweaks to the oprofile.spec file force it to use qt4 based
> qt-devel rpm would be appreciated.
Fedora 13 qt3:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=qt3.git;a=blob;f=qt3.spec;h=18f285029818b200c91d2b696ecc25be2d5a0649;hb=f13#l171
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:37, William Cohen wrote:
> I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is
> converting the following in the spec file:
>
> BuildRequires: qt-devel
>
> into a dependency on the qt3-devel rpm, which is wrong. There is a qt-devel
> for qt4 available. Why
I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is converting
the following in the spec file:
BuildRequires: qt-devel
into a dependency on the qt3-devel rpm, which is wrong. There is a qt-devel for
qt4 available. Why isn't it using the proper qt-devel? The package built
properl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Wx:
2c0d49373551271a9237bf779edfd0b1 Wx-0.9901.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711472
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07
16:37:46 EDT ---
perl-Data-Compare-1.22-1.fc14 has been submitted as an upd
On 06/05/2011 10:23 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Except for sensitive pages like Legal, you don't
> need to ask for permission.
And those sensitive pages are locked down, so you can't edit them
anyways. :)
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706258
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=503567&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> Hard to say without the entire spec, but one typical cause of "sometimes
> works sometimes doesn't" issues with macros are %define's inside macro
> {} blocks, which "work" until the first parametrized macro is called,
> and after that it do
On 06/07/2011 07:04 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> I agree with you but this bug is a bit special in that it is several
> versions out of date. If this was F14 or even F13, the Epoch bump would be
> good. But adding a bump for a mistake on a F10 branch seems unnecessary now.
Even though that makes t
tis 2011-06-07 klockan 13:50 -0400 skrev Bill Nottingham:
> Group updates are not a part of any normal update process (either
> via yum, or anaconda.)
yum upgrade is not a normal update process but it does include doing
"yum groupupdate Base". See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
/ab
On 06/07/2011 11:52 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> You can do it on the version of the software. If it has a pkg-config
> file you can do something like this (taken from an existing specfile in
> Fedora):
>
> %prep
> %setup -q
> %if %(pkg-config --max-version 2.1.2 ftgl 2>/dev/null && echo 1 || echo
Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) said:
> > I don't mind if it is installed by default. I just hope that it
> > doesn't get pulled in by another package during an update
>
> My plan is for F-16+ comps only, so this should not happen. I guess it
> would get pulled in by group updates though (ass
On 06/07/2011 07:25 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Right, sometimes it is more convenient to start off with a bogus
> completion and manually modify intermediate parts afterwards.
> bash-completion is simply too smart for this kind of usage.
Hitting Alt-/ instead of tab can be used to force filename
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711486
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Scott 2011-06-07
13:44:22 EDT ---
Thanks.
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to report/fix t
Le 07/06/2011 16:36, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:00:11 +0200,
>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>> The only problem with the fedora version of lightning : the
>> extension is only in english
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504994
> Does the F15 version have the same
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:33:15PM +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
>
>> Even if all it did was to get rid of bogus completions it would still
>> offer a better user experience at a small cost so it should be in the
>> default package set. Now it d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711486
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:33:15PM +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
> Even if all it did was to get rid of bogus completions it would still
> offer a better user experience at a small cost so it should be in the
> default package set. Now it does more than that.
It is not that easy, because it als
On 06/07/2011 05:23 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> I am hacking on a slighly modified kernel spec file for an OLPC arm
> test kernel. While chasing strange build errors, I find that
> %{image_install_path} isn't always being expanded.
>
> The resulting build script looks like
>
> http://fpaste.or
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:00:11 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> The only problem with the fedora version of lightning : the
> extension is only in english
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504994
Does the F15 version have the same problem? Lightning was dropped and
resurrected, so the
I am hacking on a slighly modified kernel spec file for an OLPC arm
test kernel. While chasing strange build errors, I find that
%{image_install_path} isn't always being expanded.
The resulting build script looks like
http://fpaste.org/LQwR/#82
where %{image_install_path}, defined earlier as
On 06/07/2011 12:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Tom Callaway wrote:
>>> pyrit:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
>>
>> Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the
>> owners went out of
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tom Callaway wrote:
> > pyrit:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
>
> Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the
> owners went out of the way to secure with the best available protocol is
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tom Callaway wrote:
> > pyrit:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
>
> Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the
> owners went out of the way to secure with the best available protocol is
Tom Callaway wrote:
> pyrit:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the
owners went out of the way to secure with the best available protocol is
EXACTLY what we need…
Use of this tool is probably against the law in mo
Hi,
libass's license changed from GPLv2+ to ISC, which is more
permissive, since 0.9.12. No ABI/API changes, only fixes/improvements
so I'm going to push it to all releases.
Regards,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: pcsc-perl-1.4.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711380
Summary: pcsc-perl-1.4.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Ve
Am 06.06.2011 17:30, schrieb Jerry James:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> ok - so i should file a bugreport to "vnstat" if i understand you right?
>
> I think so, yes.
done - thank you for your helpful feedback!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711383
--
fre 2011-06-03 klockan 07:19 -0400 skrev Neal Becker:
> >
>
> So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version.
>
> OK.
>
> It seems more direct to condition on foo-devel version. Is that
> unreasonable?
> Or just too difficult?
You can do it on the version of the s
35 matches
Mail list logo
