Re: Cannot reach Adrian R.

On 05/25/2011 05:22 PM, Honza Horak wrote: > I'm trying to reach Adrian Reber for a couple of days, but all emails > sent to his address have returned back undelivered. He's a maintainer of > many packages and the only one with commit rights by many of them. His > last action I've noticed is from M

Buildbot package

Hi, is there any reason that we have buildbot 7.12 ((January 21, 2010)) and that upstream is now 8.3 ? any problem to upgrade it ? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

ons 2011-05-25 klockan 12:37 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore: > another issue that i thought of was existing ldap/nis systems that allocate > regular users in the 500-1000 range when installing or upgrading if they use > policies that probit system accounts from logging in will have users unable > t

Re: 9base in Fedora?

ons 2011-05-25 klockan 19:14 +0100 skrev Matthew Garrett: > If they're in their path, other utilities are going to misbehave in > ways > that will be difficult to debug. The user could add the directory to PATH without exporting PATH to subprocesses, or they could use the shell's alias function

Re: provenpackager attention needed for penmount

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:16:47AM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 25.5.2011 03:18, Peter Hutterer napsal(a): > > This update has been in testing since April 17 and all it requires is a > > provenpackager ack. Harmless update, penmount was completely broken before > > so it's hard to make it more br

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 03:14:43 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > On 05/25/2011 06:14 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > Coordination would be nice if we can decide on how we can sanely make > > > changes to this. > > > > I would think f

Re: systemd errors being reported

On Wed, 25.05.11 23:05, Paul Brewer (walterhu...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > Adam Williamson at RedHat suggested I post here, so please don't be too hard > on me. > > I have a couple of systemd units which are reported as in error: > > -- > [palooka@f15

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On 05/25/2011 08:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> On 05/25/2011 06:14 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >>> Coordination would be nice if we can decide on how we can sanely make >>> changes to this. >> I would think first is to reach conscious

Re: systemd errors being reported

On 05/25/2011 04:05 PM, Paul Brewer wrote: > ip6tables is not installed on my system, and I know that livesys-late is a > remnant of having installed from a Live CD. I see livesys-late on my anaconda installed systems too. I have some other fun ones: VMware.serviceerror inactive de

systemd errors being reported

Hi, Adam Williamson at RedHat suggested I post here, so please don't be too hard on me. I have a couple of systemd units which are reported as in error: -- [palooka@f15 ~]$ systemctl list-units --all --no-pager|grep error ip6tables.service error

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 09:36, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Petr Sabata (con...@redhat.com) said: >> > >> There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common >> > >> binaries such as firefox, java, etc already reside. They all have magic >> > >> env variables to define their root f

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:03, Petr Sabata wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:59:27AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:35, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:28:02AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> There is no reason not to put them in /usr/

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 05/25/2011 06:14 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Coordination would be nice if we can decide on how we can sanely make > > changes to this. > > I would think first is to reach consciousness on what the Do you mean consesus ? W

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On 05/25/2011 06:14 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Coordination would be nice if we can decide on how we can sanely make > changes to this. I would think first is to reach consciousness on what the reserved/system IDs are supposed to be once that has been done we can start looking at what is the b

Re: provenpackager attention needed for penmount

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 08:16 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 25.5.2011 03:18, Peter Hutterer napsal(a): > > This update has been in testing since April 17 and all it requires is a > > provenpackager ack. Harmless update, penmount was completely broken before > > so it's hard to make it more broken no

Re: upstart → systemd upgrade path issue

On 05/25/2011 04:34 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > upstart-1.2-2 hasn't changed upstart behavior. It fixes upstream bugs and > also adds new > features like new stanzas (manual,debug) and also .override files > feature adapted from Ubuntu. We don't do feature additions like this in a existing releas

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:10 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > Le 24/05/2011 22:26, Nicoleau Fabien a écrit : > > Hi, > > I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like > > youtube, dailymotion, etc ... > > > > This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will > >

[Bug 663931] regression from 0.710.08 soap:Client, Application failed during request deserialization

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663931 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 705084] perl-SOAP-Lite: do not depend on mod_perl

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705084 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 705084] perl-SOAP-Lite: do not depend on mod_perl

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705084 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-25 14:56:33 EDT --- perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:53 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:39:16PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > If I get a bug complaining that something doesn't work because the user > > > is using plan9 awk rather than g

[Bug 707442] sqlsh's help needs IO::Scalar and Term::ReadLine::Gnu

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707442 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 663931] regression from 0.710.08 soap:Client, Application failed during request deserialization

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663931 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-25 14:54:29 EDT --- perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora

[Bug 705084] perl-SOAP-Lite: do not depend on mod_perl

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705084 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 705084] perl-SOAP-Lite: do not depend on mod_perl

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705084 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-25 14:54:34 EDT --- perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Putting them in your path's just going to break things. > > The plan is to have them _prefixed_ in your path, and un-prefixed in a > specified directory so you can frob t

[Bug 663931] regression from 0.710.08 soap:Client, Application failed during request deserialization

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663931 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:39:16PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > If I get a bug complaining that something doesn't work because the user > > is using plan9 awk rather than gnu awk, they're going to get very firmly > > NOTABUGged. I hardly

Outage: Upgrades/Reboots - 2011-05-31 18:00 UTC

Outage: Upgrades/Reboots - 2011-05-31 18:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 18:00 UTC on 2011-05-31, which will last approximately 2 hours. During this time there may be very short outages of services as machines are updated and rebooted into new kernels. Machines will be rebooted in an

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:21:04PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > If they're used to plan9, they'll presumably want these in their path. > > > If they're in their path, other u

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Putting them in your path's just going to break things. The plan is to have them _prefixed_ in your path, and un-prefixed in a specified directory so you can frob the path to run scripts that expect p9 utilities. I am not sure what this p

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:21:04PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > If they're used to plan9, they'll presumably want these in their path. > > If they're in their path, other utilities are going to misbehave in ways > > that will be difficul

Re: upstart → systemd upgrade path issue

On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plaut...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today this update: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14 > > got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:42:02PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:52 +0100, Matthew

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:42:02PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > What would cause someone to choose to use t

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011/5/25 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > On 05/25/2011 12:30 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:25:44 AM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec  wrote: Hi all, I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN&  GID_MIN from 500 t

Re: 9base in Fedora?

Hi. On Wed, 25 May 2011 13:18:20 -0400, seth vidal wrote > I keep forgetting who fedora is for. It's not like the problem of having multiple implementations of basic UNIX command line tools has never come up before, though. Solaris has been doing that for quite a long time. http://download.orac

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 05:25:44 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 to >> > 1000 in upgraded

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the > > > ones that exist in Fedora already?

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the > > ones that exist in Fedora already? > > They come from an environment where plan9 is more commonly u

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 03:55:55 AM Peter Vrabec wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 05:25:44 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 > > > to 1000

[Bug 656624] Please Update Spec File to use %ghost on files in /var/run and /var/lock

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656624 Lee Dan changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: Cannot reach Adrian R.

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:22:53PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > I'm trying to reach Adrian Reber for a couple of days, but all emails > sent to his address have returned back undelivered. He's a maintainer of What error did you get? I have not seen anything. Adrian -- devel mail

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 13:10 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > > What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the > > > ones that exist in Fedora already? > > > > They come from an environment where plan9 is more

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the > > ones that exist in Fedora already? > > They come from an environment where plan9 is more commonly used Rob Pike's house ? Dave -- devel maili

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:59:36PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > The question is - why does having incompatible plan9 implementations of > > > common commands make Fedo

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:59:36PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > The question is - why does having incompatible plan9 implementations of > > common commands make Fedora 'better', outside of "having more stuff"? > > > > You could s

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > I'm not against wider announcement. I'm just not sure what is the right way - > F16 Feature/Release Notes/ ? How about slashdot's front page? Must be a really slow news day. http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/05/25/1312200/Fedora-16-

[perl-Perl-Critic-Tics] Import

commit 8ec73fe547df3e0934383f9dc6a90c680e35ae24 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed May 25 18:07:38 2011 +0200 Import and remove defattr macro. .gitignore |1 + perl-Perl-Critic-Tics.spec | 52 sources

File Perl-Critic-Tics-0.006.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Tics: dc5d3ea23a5ace74aa11d000cc21 Perl-Critic-Tics-0.006.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraprojec

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Petr Sabata (con...@redhat.com) said: > > > >> There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common > > > >> binaries such as firefox, java, etc already reside. They all have magic > > > >> env variables to defin

Re: execve()ing non-existent command returns EPERM instead of ENOENT in Koji

On 2011-05-25, Petr Pisar wrote: > > A test executes non-existent command and expects ENOENT. This is how it > works even in my local Rawhide. However Koji glibc returns EPERM. > Correction: error 13 is EACCES. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: Upgrading from Fedora 14 to 15 -> some problems

Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote: > Upgraded from DVD. > > Just booted from DVD, chose the "install or upgrade" & then did default > stuff. The DVD does not include updates when doing the upgrade, which means it is fully expected that some packages will not be updated because they're newer in

Re: 9base in Fedora?

Petr Sabata (con...@redhat.com) said: > > >> There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common > > >> binaries such as firefox, java, etc already reside. They all have magic > > >> env variables to define their root for scripts and > > >> symlinks/wrappers/alternatives in /us

Cannot reach Adrian R.

Hi all, I'm trying to reach Adrian Reber for a couple of days, but all emails sent to his address have returned back undelivered. He's a maintainer of many packages and the only one with commit rights by many of them. His last action I've noticed is from March this year. Some of packages he ow

FESCo and Board Election Questionnaires posted

Hi folks: The responses to the questionnaire are now posted: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F16_elections_questionnaire Responses are divided by elected body and then appear in the order the responses arrived in my inbox. Please take a moment to look over them to better prepare yourselves for t

execve()ing non-existent command returns EPERM instead of ENOENT in Koji

Reviewer of my package found the package does pass tests in Koji (dist-f16). I found the reason: A test executes non-existent command and expects ENOENT. This is how it works even in my local Rawhide. However Koji glibc returns EPERM. You can see it in build.log of scratch build

Re: Upgrading from Fedora 14 to 15 -> some problems

Em 25-05-2011 10:42, Robert 'Bob' Jensen escreveu: > - "Casimiro de Almeida Barreto" wrote: > >> Yesterday I upgraded my notebook from 14 to 15. >> >> Problems: >> >> 1st: it deleted network configurations. >> 2nd: rpmdb was left quite messed. Several dependencies non satisfied. >> As >> this

Re: Upgrading from Fedora 14 to 15 -> some problems

- "Casimiro de Almeida Barreto" wrote: > Yesterday I upgraded my notebook from 14 to 15. > > Problems: > > 1st: it deleted network configurations. > 2nd: rpmdb was left quite messed. Several dependencies non satisfied. > As > this particular box was already upgraded from 13 to 14, there we

[perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma] Created tag perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.035-2.fc16

The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.035-2.fc16' was created pointing to: 1e5d65f... Rebuild for xz 5.0.3 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi

Re: Upgrading from Fedora 14 to 15 -> some problems

On 05/25/2011 06:56 PM, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote: > Yesterday I upgraded my notebook from 14 to 15. If you have specific bugs, do report them in bugzilla. General feedback should go into users list. Thanks Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

[perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma] Rebuild for xz 5.0.3

commit 1e5d65f0c44bb0db6d1ef773a6c45077f11c1e0a Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed May 25 14:12:07 2011 +0100 Rebuild for xz 5.0.3 perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma.spec b/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma.s

Upgrading from Fedora 14 to 15 -> some problems

Yesterday I upgraded my notebook from 14 to 15. Problems: 1st: it deleted network configurations. 2nd: rpmdb was left quite messed. Several dependencies non satisfied. As this particular box was already upgraded from 13 to 14, there were problems dealing with very old things (fc13 stuff). Much of

OFED 1.6 InfiniBand packages in Fedora 16?

Hello all It seems the openfabrics.org people are planning their OFED 1.6 release which includes most of the useful InfiniBand packages for middle of September 2011. http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ewg/2011-March/016445.html This seems to coincide nicely with the Fedora 16 release schedul

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On 05/25/2011 12:30 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:25:44 AM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN& GID_MIN from 500 to >>> 1000 in upgraded shadow-utils. >>> >>

libcgroups adds -tools subpackage

Starting with libcgroup-0.37.1-3 (heading to rawhide right now), libcgroup is divided into following subpackages: - libcgroup - the library only - libcgroup-tools - command line tools, services and daemons, previously part of libcgroup.rpm Please check your RPM dependencies and update them accordi

Re: upstart → systemd upgrade path issue

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > today this update: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14 > got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent with the update > policies, but that's not the matter here.) Hi, upstart-1.x bra

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

Le 25/05/2011 12:58, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:26 +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like >> youtube, dailymotion, etc ... >> >> This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will >> read t

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

Le 24/05/2011 23:10, Haïkel Guémar a écrit : > Le 24/05/2011 22:26, Nicoleau Fabien a écrit : >> Hi, >> I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like >> youtube, dailymotion, etc ... >> >> This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will >> read the video as

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:26 +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote: > Hi, > I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like > youtube, dailymotion, etc ... > > This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will > read the video as a stream. > > The default value in the

rawhide report: 20110525 changes

Compose started at Wed May 25 08:15:04 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_

Broken dependencies: perl-Text-Hunspell

perl-Text-Hunspell has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Text-Hunspell-2.02-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libhunspell-1.2.so.0()(64bit) On i386: perl-Text-Hunspell-2.02-2.fc15.i686 requires libhunspell-1.2.so.0 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Re: 9base in Fedora?

Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common > binaries such as firefox, java, etc already reside. They all have magic > env variables to define their root for scripts and > symlinks/wrappers/alternatives in /usr/bin Well, actually, the proper pl

upstart → systemd upgrade path issue

Hi, today this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14 got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent with the update policies, but that's not the matter here.) The result is that systemd in F15 no longer Obsoletes the upstart in F14: https://bugzilla.red

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 10:55 +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 05:25:44 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 to > > > 1000 in u

[perl-SQL-Shell/f15] add requires 707442

commit c40655ac2077311c2cccd8a58418e4e73450dd53 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed May 25 10:55:12 2011 +0200 add requires 707442 clean specfile. perl-SQL-Shell.spec | 16 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-SQL-Shell.spec b/

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

Hi, On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 05:25:44 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 to > > 1000 in upgraded shadow-utils. > > > > Where? > > /etc/login.defs. > > shadow-u

[perl-SQL-Shell/f14] add requires 707442

commit bd30708f4aa71fa53ee8a8147d991be16ec2f604 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed May 25 10:47:29 2011 +0200 add requires 707442 perl-SQL-Shell.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-SQL-Shell.spec b/perl-SQL-Shell.spec index 69f6143.

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

Hi, Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2011-05-25, o godz. 00:31, przez Domingo Becker: > 2011/5/24 Nicoleau Fabien : >> Hi, >> I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like >> youtube, dailymotion, etc ... (...) >> My question is : >> what am I suppose to set in "Requires" field fo

Re: 9base in Fedora?

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:59:27AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:35, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:28:02AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >> There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common > >> binaries such as firef