Re: provenpackager attention needed for penmount

2011-05-24 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 25.5.2011 03:18, Peter Hutterer napsal(a): > This update has been in testing since April 17 and all it requires is a > provenpackager ack. Harmless update, penmount was completely broken before > so it's hard to make it more broken now. Just one more nitpick ... you meant proventester, right?

tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-05-25)

2011-05-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
In honor of F15's release (and the fact that we don't have any meeting keyword tickets that are not waiting for other action) FESCo will be skipping their meeting tomorrow. Congratulations on Fedora 15's release, and thanks to all the hard work from developers, package maintainers, testers and re

Re: provenpackager attention needed for penmount

2011-05-24 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 05/25/2011 06:48 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Please give some karma to > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-penmount-1.4.1-2.fc13 > This update has been in testing since April 17 and all it requires is a > provenpackager ack. Harmless update, penmount was completely broken befo

provenpackager attention needed for penmount

2011-05-24 Thread Peter Hutterer
Please give some karma to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-penmount-1.4.1-2.fc13 This update has been in testing since April 17 and all it requires is a provenpackager ack. Harmless update, penmount was completely broken before so it's hard to make it more broken now. And I'm s

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011-05-24 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:25:44 AM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 to > > 1000 in upgraded shadow-utils. > > > > Where? > > /etc/login.defs. > > shadow-utils-

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

2011-05-24 Thread Domingo Becker
2011/5/24 Nicoleau Fabien : > Hi, > I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like > youtube, dailymotion, etc ... > > This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will > read the video as a stream. > > The default value in the configuration file for the video

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

2011-05-24 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 24/05/2011 22:26, Nicoleau Fabien a écrit : > Hi, > I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like > youtube, dailymotion, etc ... > > This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will > read the video as a stream. > > The default value in the configuratio

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

2011-05-24 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Nicoleau Fabien wrote: > This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will > read the video as a stream. > > The default value in the configuration file for the video player is "vlc > --quiet %u". > > My question is : > what am I suppose to set

which video player for a package Requires ?

2011-05-24 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
Hi, I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like youtube, dailymotion, etc ... This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will read the video as a stream. The default value in the configuration file for the video player is "vlc --quiet %u". My questio

Anaconda crashes during kickstart install in Fedora 15

2011-05-24 Thread Andrew McNabb
I've been unable to install Fedora 15 with a kickstart script due to a crash described in the following bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706542 I've hit the error on a few different machines, and another user has now reported the same problem. However, I did not have any problems

Re: Review request/swap: gnupg-pkcs11-scd and spim

2011-05-24 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:25 PM, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > I have two packages that need to be reviewed. I'd be willing to review > two others in exchange. I'll take spim. Can you review one of the following in exchange (your choice)? ocaml-dpt: A SAT solver (used by Isabelle, which I hope t

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011-05-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:45 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > On 05/24/2011 09:20 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 08:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > >> * This could potentially break sites that are currently using the > >> 500-1000 UID range and rely on the order of allocation of UI

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011-05-24 Thread John Reiser
On 05/24/2011 09:20 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 08:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> * This could potentially break sites that are currently using the >> 500-1000 UID range and rely on the order of allocation of UIDs for >> their users on new machines matching with the UIDs on

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011-05-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 24.05.11 12:20, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > * AFAIK, we actually have not run into the 500 uid limit yet (although > > it is a bit low to be comfortable) > > * AFAIK, we've only allocated the range 0-100 for reserved IDs. > > * The 0-100 reserved IDs are actually the pain poin

Re: 9base in Fedora?

2011-05-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:35, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:28:02AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common >> binaries such as firefox, java, etc already reside. They all have magic >> env variables to define t

Re: 9base in Fedora?

2011-05-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:28:02AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > There is no reason not to put them in /usr/lib(64). That's where common > binaries such as firefox, java, etc already reside. They all have magic > env variables to define their root for scripts and > symlinks/wrappers/alternatives

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011-05-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 08:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 to > > 1000 > > in upgraded shadow-utils. > > > > Where? > > /etc/login.defs. > > shadow-utils

Re: UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011-05-24 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 to 1000 > in upgraded shadow-utils. > > Where? > /etc/login.defs. > shadow-utils-4.1.4.3-1.fc16 > > I suppose UID/GID_MIN=1000 is more common(other distros, upst

Re: Potential python-docutils license change

2011-05-24 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > To get python-docutils building with python-3.2 I've upgraded the F15 and > Rawhide versions to a snapshot of 0.8.  Unfortunately, this version brings > in new code that's licensed under the Apache license.  This would change the > license

rawhide report: 20110524 changes

2011-05-24 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue May 24 08:15:03 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- OpenLP-1.9.5-3.fc16.noarch requires hicolor-iicon-theme acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requir

UID_MIN & GID_MIN changed

2011-05-24 Thread Peter Vrabec
Hi all, I'd like to inform you that I have changed UID_MIN & GID_MIN from 500 to 1000 in upgraded shadow-utils. Where? /etc/login.defs. shadow-utils-4.1.4.3-1.fc16 I suppose UID/GID_MIN=1000 is more common(other distros, upstream). We are not in situation that 500 IDs for system accounts ought

Re: 9base in Fedora?

2011-05-24 Thread nodata
On 20/05/11 14:17, Petr Sabata wrote: > Hi list, > > I've been thinking about packaging 9base [1], a port of Plan 9 userspace > tools, > for Fedora. I'm interested in opinions on what style is "better" and why. > > The problem is most of 9base binaries (and their manpages) have the same > name as

Re: 9base in Fedora?

2011-05-24 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Lun 23 mai 2011 17:55, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:54:48AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> 1. install libraries (and binaries? see 3.) in /usr/lib(64) >> > Large software packages must not use a direct subdirectory under >> > the /usr hierarchy. >> 2. provide