Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #515 Investigate a "features" repo for s
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2011 23:49, Josef Bacik napsal(a):
>> btrfs-progs hasn't changed much so you should be fine with whats in
>> fedora. If you want to be testing the latest and greatest it's
>> probably better to either follow Chris's btrfs-unstable.git
Peter Jones writes:
> It's fair to say that rawhide doesn't serve the same purpose any more - since
> we're branching so much earlier, the thing that used to be rawhide is
> essentially the branch. But the newer form of rawhide does have a feature -
> it allows those of us working on multiple fea
Compose started at Tue May 10 13:16:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 09:04 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 04:00 -0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:04 +, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like that firmware is in Linus' tree, but somehow it is not in
> > > Woodhouse's linux-firmware tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703413
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10
18:19:59 EDT ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an
On 05/10/2011 09:08 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 5/10/11 4:54 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 May 2011 13:07:22 -0400
>> Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> If you need a usable system I recommend that you stay away from the
>>> rawhide train until it hits alpha which is sometime late August if
>>>
Dne 10.5.2011 23:49, Josef Bacik napsal(a):
> btrfs-progs hasn't changed much so you should be fine with whats in
> fedora. If you want to be testing the latest and greatest it's
> probably better to either follow Chris's btrfs-unstable.git tree or my
> btrfs-work.git tree on kernel.org. Thanks,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-STOMP-Client:
89253577aa3d35655acb15ea2e86ad33 Net-STOMP-Client-1.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is rawhide following current btrfs development releases with kernel
> patches and userland programs? Or, should we role our own? I am
> interested in testing only.
>
btrfs-progs hasn't changed much so you should be fine with what
Hi,
Is rawhide following current btrfs development releases with kernel
patches and userland programs? Or, should we role our own? I am
interested in testing only.
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697961
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=498171&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 05/10/2011 11:34 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Rawhide used to be something we could run to see where the distribution is
> going and, perhaps, help a little bit with the quality assurance. More
> recently, I've been told a few times that I should *not* be running
> Rawhide and that the F15 bra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701252
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701252
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10
17:18:30 EDT ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fed
On 5/10/11 4:54 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2011 13:07:22 -0400
> Adam Jackson wrote:
>> If you need a usable system I recommend that you stay away from the
>> rawhide train until it hits alpha which is sometime late August if
>> memory serves me correct.
>
> (http://permalink.gman
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:54:44PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> The breakage is fine, one expects that. A fundamental breakage that the
> relevant developers don't even notice for weeks is another question; as I
> said, that suggests that people running Rawhide are few and far between.
I'm con
On Tue, 10 May 2011 13:07:22 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> All we had here was a case where one tool didn't catch a breakage because
> the other bit of the tools weren't complete enough yet. I don't think
> that's sufficient cause to question rawhide's existence.
The breakage is fine, one expects
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:22:37AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > The resources have been put in, there are ABI checks in the RPMs but as ajax
> > said, they don't work until the ABI is bumped upstream.
> I'm thinking about making the xserver package export ABI majors of
> md5sums of, well, someth
Sorry for not sending this sooner.
The outage on pkgs.fedoraproject.org should be complete.
Please report any issues or problems found.
kevin
--
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:47:10 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> A reminder that this outage will begin in about 15minutes.
>
> Outage: pkgs.fedoraprojec
On 5/10/11 1:41 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:07:22PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> X being broken in rawhide was in who knows how many peoples' ways, and
>> even though it's provenpackager+ and even though all it would have taken
>> was a mass driver rebuild, nobody even tri
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:07:22PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> X being broken in rawhide was in who knows how many peoples' ways, and
> even though it's provenpackager+ and even though all it would have taken
> was a mass driver rebuild, nobody even tried. Where _are_ you people?
> Why do I bot
On 5/10/11 12:23 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> I'm not talking about this week. The X11 problem was reported three weeks
> ago, and the "don't run Rawhide" advice given to me came rather before
> that. Rawhide has been an unusually painful place to be for some time
> now, and a lot of people, I b
A reminder that this outage will begin in about 15minutes.
Outage: pkgs.fedoraproject.org - 2011-05-10 17:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2011-05-10 17:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infras
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Could it be that Fedora lacks the resources to maintain both Rawhide and
> the next-release branch? In retrospect, was No Frozen Rawhide as good an
> idea as it seemed?
I need to redo my tongue-n-cheek seasons of rawhide in the new No
Fr
On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:04:22 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Things breaking in Rawhide are not a surprise; indeed, if it doesn't
> > occasionally bite the hand that's feeding it, somebody probably isn't
> > trying hard enough. But if it can remain this fundamentally broken for
> > weeks because t
commit 2872ce2b1c18ab6003c987408011c9e3aea78d8e
Author: remi
Date: Tue May 10 18:14:28 2011 +0200
update to 0.6 (docfix)
.gitignore|4 ++--
perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --gi
On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:34:34 -0600
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
...snip...
> Rawhide used to be something we could run to see where the
> distribution is going and, perhaps, help a little bit with the
> quality assurance. More recently, I've been told a few times that I
> should *not* be running Rawh
commit 2acc8d443c5cb2520cf83f04e2a1f540ea3f16b6
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Tue May 10 18:13:58 2011 +0200
Initial push.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain:
c1dc5ff6f2533dcf2d79123618e993f2 Task-Kensho-Toolchain-0.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSLGlue:
fe8bfbd47776d7a48258c1d62191f80b Net-SSLGlue-0.6.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:04, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 5/10/11 11:34 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
> > Things breaking in Rawhide are not a surprise; indeed, if it doesn't
> > occasionally bite the hand that's feeding it, somebody probably isn't
> > trying hard enough. But if it can remain this
On 5/10/11 11:34 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Things breaking in Rawhide are not a surprise; indeed, if it doesn't
> occasionally bite the hand that's feeding it, somebody probably isn't
> trying hard enough. But if it can remain this fundamentally broken for
> weeks because the relevant develope
Hi,
2011/5/10 Miloslav Trmač :
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10.05.11 02:17, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Lennart Poettering
>>> wrote:
>>> > Countermeasures for the /dev/shm issue? I don't know of any.
On Tue, 10.05.11 17:35, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
> Really, all I wanted to do in this subthread is to support the request
> for a release note.
> Mirek
>
> [1] How many users of Fedora would notice if the /dev/shm tmpfs was
> limited to 512MB by default? And no, I'm _not_ advocat
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 10.05.11 02:17, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > Countermeasures for the /dev/shm issue? I don't know of any. tmpfs
>> > doesn't do quota. That's the k
On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:18:54 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> This is my fault, sorry. I updated the server but missed out on rebuilding
> the drivers. And with one thing leading to another, Easter came, I forgot
> about it and the above bug didn't show up on my radar until ajax pinged me
> this mor
On 5/9/11 9:18 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> The resources have been put in, there are ABI checks in the RPMs but as ajax
> said, they don't work until the ABI is bumped upstream.
I'm thinking about making the xserver package export ABI majors of
md5sums of, well, something, whenever the build is
On Tue, 10.05.11 02:17, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 10.05.11 01:31, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 2011/5/10 Stephen John Smoogen :
> >> > Let's make this simple:
> >> >
> >> > FAQ: How can I
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said:
> On 05/09/2011 08:38 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > a) people who manually change the IP address fo mysql to bind on
> > specific ip addresses, manually also enable
> > NetworkManager-wait-online.service.
>
> This proposal makes the assumptio
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> Neither b) nor c) is a hack; they're both improvements in behaviour
> whether or not systemd is involved. It's simply more robust for a server
> to be able to run before the network connection is available (and hence
> across state changes). You don't
Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 04:34 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>> This is your friendly reminder that we have reached the Final Change
>> Deadline for Fedora 15.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change_deadlines
>
> Without having the F15 schedule handy at the moment, is thi
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 04:34 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> This is your friendly reminder that we have reached the Final Change
> Deadline for Fedora 15.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change_deadlines
Without having the F15 schedule handy at the moment, is this as of today
and all updates s
2011/5/10 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:59:12 -0300
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make
>> for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog?
>
> I usually do, yes. It's history of the package...
Good point
>
>
This is your friendly reminder that we have reached the Final Change
Deadline for Fedora 15.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change_deadlines
"After the change deadlines for the Final release no more updates are
made to the branched development repository (e.g.
/pub/fedora/linux/development/15).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700047
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:59:12 -0300
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make
> for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog?
I usually do, yes. It's history of the package...
> Second question is somewhat silly, but I make i
On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:27:24 +0100
"Bryn M. Reeves" wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 03:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 21:14 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >> Sorry... Did I miss something?
> >
> > I'd imagine someone signed an interlinux address up to the list, and
> > that was an
Hi,
Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make
for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog?
Second question is somewhat silly, but I make it, just in case. Let's
say that you want to make a epe6 package too.
I've read at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packagi
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
a0d64780820ab20fe61abb45ac82eff2 IO-Socket-SSL-1.41.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Hello
Thank you for your enquiry, Interlinux are currently operating a waiting list
only facility for all services inquiries.
Please download a free copy of our complementary ebooks:
"Walking With The Elephants" http://diaser.org.uk/wwte/ebookwwte.zip
about Open Source collaboration.
and the p
On 05/10/2011 03:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 21:14 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Sorry... Did I miss something?
>
> I'd imagine someone signed an interlinux address up to the list, and
> that was an automated response.
Right - that was my assumption too. I met the owner
Hello
Thank you for your enquiry, Interlinux are currently operating a waiting list
only facility for all services inquiries.
Please download a free copy of our complementary ebooks:
"Walking With The Elephants" http://diaser.org.uk/wwte/ebookwwte.zip
about Open Source collaboration.
and the p
53 matches
Mail list logo
