Re: F15's /usr/include/rpc has disappeared; uncompilable

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 10:52 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Thu, 05 May 2011 15:39:21 +0200 > Jim Meyering wrote: > > > Reported as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702366 > > and http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702354 > > Well, here's NEWS: > > > * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old progra

Re: Intel N10 graphics and i915 driver

04.05.2011, 23:02, "Adam Jackson" : > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:36 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >>   >>   >>   >>   >>   >>   > > We're absolutely never doing this by default.  0 means "never sync with > vertical retrace even if the app asks to". > > The other values for t

Re: Haskell packaging questions

Very late reply... sorry it took me rather longer finally to finish the new packaging draft than I had hoped. > Wouldn't it be more clear if cabal2spec generated the %files and > %packages sections rather than using a really complicated macro? As a > reviewer, I feel like there is no way to tell w

F-15 Branched report: 20110505 changes

Compose started at Thu May 5 13:16:14 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- cpm-0.23-0.3.beta.fc12.x86_64 requires libdotconf-1.0.so.0()(64bit) db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0 dh-make-0.

[Test-Announce] 2011-05-06 @ 17:00 UTC - F-15 blocker bug review #4 [of 4]

# F15 Blocker Review meeting #4 # Date: 2011-05-06 # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST) # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net The *last* scheduled F15 Final blocker review meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll review proposed and acc

Re: Fedora 15 Final change freeze

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 10:48 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > A heads up that change freeze for the Fedora 15 is Monday May 9th. after > this > point only accepted blocker bugs will be pulled in. Please limit your > changes > to try and avoid unintended breakages. Accepted blocker

[389-devel] Please Review: (702150) Fix Coverity resource leaks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702150 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497173&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497176&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497179&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

On 5 May 2011 19:27, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said: >> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > ... >> > >> $ ifconfig >> > >> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:26:18:E4:99:77 > ... >> > >> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:ED:05:35

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said: > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: ... > > >> $ ifconfig > > >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:26:18:E4:99:77 ... > > >> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:ED:05:35 ... > > $ cat ifcfg-eth0 > > # nVidia Corporation MCP6

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

On 5 May 2011 19:07, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> On 5 May 2011 16:03, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> > Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said: >> >> On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams wrote: >> >> > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray w

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > On 5 May 2011 16:03, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said: > >> On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams wrote: > >> > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> >> Hope no one minds me writing to th

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

On 5 May 2011 16:03, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said: >> On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams wrote: >> > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user >> >> list. >> >> >> >

Re: F15's /usr/include/rpc has disappeared; uncompilable

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > The question is: what is TI-RPC and where one finds it? > Is it even packaged in Fedora? It's the libtirpc package. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: F15's /usr/include/rpc has disappeared; uncompilable

On Thu, 05 May 2011 15:39:21 +0200 Jim Meyering wrote: > Reported as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702366 > and http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702354 Well, here's NEWS: > * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old programs keep working > but new programs cannot be linked with the routines i

Re: use /etc/aliases or /etc/mail/aliases?

On 5/4/11 1:31 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Dmitry Butskoy writes: > >> Genes MailLists wrote: >> > On 05/04/2011 11:43 AM, Honza Horak wrote: >> > >> >If I recall correctly - the old sendmail way was /etc/aliases - the >> > new sendmail way is /etc/mail/aliases .. as far as I know that has the

Fedora 15 Final change freeze

Hi All, A heads up that change freeze for the Fedora 15 is Monday May 9th. after this point only accepted blocker bugs will be pulled in. Please limit your changes to try and avoid unintended breakages. thanks Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

introducing myself

Hi all, My name is Will Benton, and I work on grid and cloud stuff at Red Hat. I've been here since Fall 2008, but I've been a Red Hat user since the RHL era (Picasso was the first RHL release I used every day). My pre-Red Hat experience mainly consists of work on compilers, static program an

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said: > On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user > >> list. > >> > >> I have got inconsistent eth devices between what F

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user >> list. >> >> I have got inconsistent eth devices between what Fedora Gnome Desktop >> is telling me and what ifconfig is t

F15's /usr/include/rpc has disappeared; uncompilable

Just a quick FYI: If you haven't already gotten Fedora 15's latest glibc-headers package, you may want to wait for 2.13.90-11. Here's why: glibc-headers-2.13.90-10.x86_64 no longer includes any of the /usr/include/rpc/*.h files. Contrast with glibc-headers-2.13.90-9.x86_64, where there are 18:

[Bug 646832] Net::Amazon::S3 is way out of date, please update

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646832 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added --

rawhide report: 20110505 changes

Compose started at Thu May 5 08:15:03 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x8

spec file licensing

Having just signed the new FPCA, I'm wondering if there is any boilerplate for specifically licensing spec files. Is there a quick and easy way to state, for example: "this spec file is licensed under the same terms as the package itself"? And as most of the spec files I deal with are generated by