There will be an outage starting at 2011-04-20 20:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-04-20 20:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Several of the build related system
There will be an outage starting at 2011-04-21 20:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-04-21 20:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
The fas01 account system machine wil
As part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Branch_Proposal I
have prepared an update to fedora-packager (the package that holds
fedpkg); 0.5.9.0-1. This update contains code to handle repositories
that are in the old naming style as well as the new style. It also has
code to detect wh
Compose started at Mon Apr 18 13:15:55 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
Hi All,
Anyone wish to swap a review. It should be a fairly simple Sugar Activity.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697697
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697229
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a blog post about it, maybe not the best way to help Fedora
> users so feel free to take the idea and the content and repackage it
> as appropriate.
>
> Thanks, very useful!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
Paolo Valente writes:
> I hope this is the right list for announcing this work.
LKML would be a better place for you to propose new I/O schedulers.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
neat. I should have seen that before.
thanks anyway.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 18.04.11 23:06, Vamsi Krishna Brahmajosyula (
> vamsikrishna.brahmajosy...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I dont know if its the right place to ask this question.
>
On Mon, 18.04.11 23:06, Vamsi Krishna Brahmajosyula
(vamsikrishna.brahmajosy...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I dont know if its the right place to ask this question.
>
> I use fedora 15. I built a vanilla kernel. I observed that it calls the
> 'init' instead of systemd. Then I edited the grub
Hello,
I dont know if its the right place to ask this question.
I use fedora 15. I built a vanilla kernel. I observed that it calls the
'init' instead of systemd. Then I edited the grub entry making
init=/bin/systemd which works fine. But i want to know if i can get the
patch to the vanilla kerne
Hi,
I'm orphaning
xmltooling - this has some hard to fix or pain to avoid needs for an
openssl built curl.
opensaml - requires xmltooling.
glite-security-util-java
glite-security-trustmanager
Steve.
--
Steve Traylen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
On 04/13/2011 03:38 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I was just trying to update gnome-mplayer (not in fedora, but that is
> irrelevant) which migrated from gconf to gsettings. The problem is, that
> the standard scriptlets [1] do not run on upgrades, leaving the package
> in a not worki
Just wanted to make sure, my previous reply wasn't meant to be accusatory
that you guys took too long. Just meant to explain why I wouldn't be
getting back with info on whether the proposed fix worked or not.
Sorry for any misunderstandings,
--
Eric Mesa
http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com
--
devel
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8.2. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.8
testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing 389-ds
I've created a short blogpost about this issue:
http://kparal.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/autoqa-upgradepath-vs-updates-to-multiple-fedora-releases/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the subject says it: Is someone able to reach Douglas Warner?
I hope, he's ok, but it looks like, he's very busy.
He sought help for maintenance of syslog-ng [1], which I offered. This
was his last post on devel-list (dated Feb. 2, 2011), but I m
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 04:35 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa
> > > rejected
> > > the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the
> > packages
> > > to be properly pushed to f stable before green-lighting the
> > > match
Thanks for the suggestions to look in rpmfusion. I got confirmation from a
user on the users mailing list that the rpmfusion solution worked for them.
I needed to get things working right away, so I've temporarily moved on to
Ubuntu on that machine as their restricted drivers utility found the
nec
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:57:55 +0200, AB wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 04:35 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa
> > > rejected
> > > the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the
> > packages
> > > to be properly pushed to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-Signature-0.67 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697456
Summary: perl-Module-Signature-0.67 is available
Product:
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 04:35 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa
> > rejected
> > the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the
> packages
> > to be properly pushed to f stable before green-lighting the
> > matching package fo
Compose started at Mon Apr 18 08:15:12 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1:NetworkManager-openvpn-0.8.998-1.git20110405.fc15.x86_64 requires
NetworkManager >= 1:0.8.998
1:NetworkManager-pptp-0.8.998-1.fc15.x86_64 requires Ne
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696725
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
> > > now, if you shut down A with "systemctl stop A", this will also stop B,
> > > and it will do so in the inverse starting order. i.e. stop B first, stop
> > > A second. BindTo= would do exactly the same here. The difference now
> > > comes if for some reason A dies independently of anybody runn
> Hi,
>
> I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa
> rejected
> the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the packages
> to be properly pushed to f stable before green-lighting the
> matching package for f.
I suppose you're talking about upgradepath test. Y
27 matches
Mail list logo
