Re: Acer Aspire One, Wifi, and Fedora 15

2011-04-15 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:05:55PM -0400, Eric Mesa wrote: >linuxwireless.org/en/users/drivers/brcm80211*says that my wifi chip is >in the 2.6.38 kernel. *That page tells me to d/l some firmware files >to a specific directory. *I went there and those files are already >there. *But

Acer Aspire One, Wifi, and Fedora 15

2011-04-15 Thread Eric Mesa
I originally posted this to the user mailing list, but as I thought about it, I realized that this might be something that needs to be brought to the attention of the developers before Fedora 15 ships. My original message: I just got an Acer Aspire One and threw Fedora 15 Alpha on it. This is a g

F-15 Branched report: 20110415 changes

2011-04-15 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Apr 15 13:15:15 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc

[Bug 631302] FTBFS coq-8.2pl1-1.fc12

2011-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631302 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 676688] Upgrade coq to version 8.3

2011-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676688 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 530254] Package mime-type information for Coq files

2011-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530254 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 530254] Package mime-type information for Coq files

2011-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530254 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-04-15 17:47:49 EDT --- coq-8.3pl1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable

[Bug 676688] Upgrade coq to version 8.3

2011-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676688 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-04-15 17:48:00 EDT --- coq-8.3pl1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable

[Bug 631302] FTBFS coq-8.2pl1-1.fc12

2011-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631302 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-04-15 17:47:55 EDT --- coq-8.3pl1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable

2011-04-15 - F-15 blocker bug review #1 - recap

2011-04-15 Thread James Laska
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-15/f-15-blocker-review.2011-04-15-17.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-15/f-15-blocker-review.2011-04-15-17.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-b

Re: f15 libchamplain bump

2011-04-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:10:11 +0200 Andreas Bierfert wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:53 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Is there a releng ticket for the koji buildroot override? > > Any news on this? yes. I mailed the two update submitters directly and asked them to coordinate. I then als

Re: PPA-like Structure

2011-04-15 Thread Bill Nottingham
Eric Mesa (ericsbinarywo...@gmail.com) said: > I'm not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but given the new > high-speed development of Firefox - is Fedora going to stick with the plan > of keeping on FF major release number per six months? > > Ubuntu has the PPA scheme, but I thin

PPA-like Structure

2011-04-15 Thread Eric Mesa
I'm not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but given the new high-speed development of Firefox - is Fedora going to stick with the plan of keeping on FF major release number per six months? Ubuntu has the PPA scheme, but I think that's "dangerous" in that it gets people to d/l from

[Bug 620410] perl-Devel-Cycle - Request for EL-6 branch

2011-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620410 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-04-15 13:58:51 EDT --- perl-Devel-Cycle-1.07-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Virtualization Test Day -- Thu. April 14th

2011-04-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 19:27 +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Maxim Burgerhout wrote: > > > > The testcase pages for Spice seem to be empty. See for example: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Virtualization_Spice_VirtManager_Setup > > > > They

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Virtualization Test Day -- Thu. April 14th

2011-04-15 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Maxim Burgerhout wrote: > > The testcase pages for Spice seem to be empty. See for example: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Virtualization_Spice_VirtManager_Setup > They were moved/rewritten. See the list here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_

Re: ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2011.4.12

2011-04-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:27:44AM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 04/15/2011 11:10 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > If you can't wait, you can request an buildroot override tag for > > ntfs-3g-2011.4.12-1.fc15. > > ... and it was just override tagged by rdieter. :) Thanks ... unfortunately I don't th

Re: ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2011.4.12

2011-04-15 Thread Tom Callaway
On 04/15/2011 11:10 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > If you can't wait, you can request an buildroot override tag for > ntfs-3g-2011.4.12-1.fc15. ... and it was just override tagged by rdieter. :) ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

Re: ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2011.4.12

2011-04-15 Thread Tom Callaway
On 04/15/2011 10:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Well in any case it's happened, but I can't rebuild libguestfs in F15. > I get[1]: > > DEBUG util.py:247: Error: No Package found for ntfsprogs > > which seems strange because it should be provided by the new combined > package. Hmm. It look

[perl-Gtk2-Notify/f15/master] update libnotify patch for current version

2011-04-15 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 77bac30... update libnotify patch for current version (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

[perl-Gtk2-Notify] update libnotify patch for current version

2011-04-15 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 77bac30c73cb8fa33d7d70aadf5ec9b559113d61 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Fri Apr 15 17:00:26 2011 +0200 update libnotify patch for current version libnotify.patch | 105 ++--- perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec | 12 - 2 files changed, 108 inse

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

2011-04-15 Thread Jeff Moyer
Ric Wheeler writes: > On 04/14/2011 05:19 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Michał Piotrowski writes: >> >>> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab >>> napisał: Michał Piotrowski writes: > But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against > such

Re: ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2011.4.12

2011-04-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:20:02PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 04/12/2011 10:36 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ntfs-3 and ntfsprogs codebases were merged into one > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27338863 > > > > Is there a chance to get this for F15? I

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 15.04.11 07:03, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > It was meant as an either or. > > > > > > The BindTo= reference in the man page does not mention that it will take > > > down with it any service bound to it when the service is stop. > > > > Requires= and BindTo= both d

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 15.04.11 09:59, Mathieu Bridon (boche...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 00:23 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Note however that while some settings override others some act as > > additions. Example: A later User=foo will override an earlier User=bar, > > but a l

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

2011-04-15 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:59:49AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > >> What kind of SSD is it? > > > > OCZ Vertex 2 with firmware 1.25 (this is not the latest version, but I > > did not have too much courage to update it :)) > > Ok. We (the ext4 list) had a report a year ago or so where someone h