On 4/13/11 11:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In the interests of general public enlightenment, it would've been nice
> if you'd answered KK's question "what am I missing", i.e., where's the
> magic bit which makes llvmpipe the default? Knowledge is always a good
> thing :)
The specfile contains
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 19:57 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 4/13/11 7:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> On 4/13/11 5:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>> Will F16 finally ship the llvmpipe as the default software renderer?
> >>
> >> If by F16, you mean F15, then yes.
> >
> > Hmmm,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> Now, we're setting _gsettings_ keys in control center, so those gconf
>> keys aren't getting updated when the user toggles that. But it doesn't
>> matter. I pushed an update to the default gconf values to launch
>> gvfs-open as the default brows
On 4/13/11 7:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On 4/13/11 5:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Will F16 finally ship the llvmpipe as the default software renderer?
>>
>> If by F16, you mean F15, then yes.
>
> Hmmm, really?
I don't know. Let's ask the machine:
synephrine:~% DISPLAY=
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Chris Smart
wrote:
> Given that Mozilla is dramatically changing the development of Firefox
> and making releases much more frequent - i.e. Firefox 5 due in July, 6
Further:
http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2011/04/13/new-channels-for-firefox-rapid-releases/
-c
--
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:41:58PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 09:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> On Wed, 13.04.11 22:55, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2011/4/13 "Jóhann B. Guðmun
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 4/13/11 5:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Will F16 finally ship the llvmpipe as the default software renderer?
>
> If by F16, you mean F15, then yes.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Xorg
Hmmm, really?
When I look at upstream mesa's code, I see this:
http:
Compose started at Wed Apr 13 13:15:34 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
Dear List,
I was just trying to update gnome-mplayer (not in fedora, but that is
irrelevant) which migrated from gconf to gsettings. The problem is, that
the standard scriptlets [1] do not run on upgrades, leaving the package
in a not working state (not running even).
I think it would be good to e
On 4/13/11 5:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Will F16 finally ship the llvmpipe as the default software renderer?
If by F16, you mean F15, then yes.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Xorg
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On 04/13/2011 04:01 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 03:26 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> On 04/12/2011 06:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 04/13/2011 06:47 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
commit 7986a8567a9dbb2a6f8187b91a021d5ad350f96f
Author: Christopher Aillon
Date: Tue A
Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Now, we're setting _gsettings_ keys in control center, so those gconf
> keys aren't getting updated when the user toggles that. But it doesn't
> matter. I pushed an update to the default gconf values to launch
> gvfs-open as the default browser which will read the valu
At the Fedora 15 Beta Go/No-Go meeting today, the F15 Beta was declared
GOLD and ready for release on April 19, 2011.
Thanks to everyone, as always, for their hard work and participation in
getting this out the door. :)
Meeting minutes are below.
-Robyn
===
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 4/12/11 11:58 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>> On 04/12/2011 09:12 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> For comparison, the baseline for the GPU in the phone in your pocket -
>>> and that platform layers like clutter more or less expect - is GLES 2.0,
>>> which is roughly comparable to Dir
On 04/13/2011 09:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Wed, 13.04.11 22:55, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/4/13 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
It would be good if maintainers could take their time and assign
# F15 Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-04-14
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Mark your calendars, the first F15 Final blocker review meeting will be
this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll review propos
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 13.04.11 22:55, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>
> >
> > 2011/4/13 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> > > It would be good if maintainers could take their time and assign
> > > themselves to their components here [1] if
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:06 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> >
> > R2spec remains a project designed to make the life of Fedora's R
> > packager's easier, so it has to remain guideline compliant. That is
> > a reason why putting the source0 as URL also is not *in my opinion*
> > a good approach (whi
On Wed, 13.04.11 22:55, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>
> 2011/4/13 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> > It would be good if maintainers could take their time and assign
> > themselves to their components here [1] if they have the time to convert
> > old sysv to a native systemd native one so th
2011/4/13 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> It would be good if maintainers could take their time and assign
> themselves to their components here [1] if they have the time to convert
> old sysv to a native systemd native one so those of us that are helping
> out and converting old sysv can better focus
On 04/13/2011 05:55 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on systemd unit file for ypbind and found some problems,
> that I'm not sure about:
It would be good if maintainers could take their time and assign
themselves to their components here [1] if they have the time to convert
old sysv
Pierre-Yves Chibon
writes:
>
> R2spec remains a project designed to make the life of Fedora's R
> packager's easier, so it has to remain guideline compliant. That is a
> reason why putting the source0 as URL also is not *in my opinion* a good
> approach (while I actually do like the --URL optio
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 08:00:33PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/4/13 Honza Horak :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working on systemd unit file for ypbind and found some problems,
> > that I'm not sure about:
> >
> > 1) if I use systemctl enable/disable instead of chkconfig in %post and
> >
On Wed, 13.04.11 19:55, Honza Horak (hho...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on systemd unit file for ypbind and found some problems,
> that I'm not sure about:
>
> 1) if I use systemctl enable/disable instead of chkconfig in %post and
> %preun sections in spec file, rpmlint prints err
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:17 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 09:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> > > And input is even briefer (evdev, synaptics, wacom, vmmouse). I'd like
> > > to chop the -drivers metapackage dow
Hi,
2011/4/13 Honza Horak :
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on systemd unit file for ypbind and found some problems,
> that I'm not sure about:
>
> 1) if I use systemctl enable/disable instead of chkconfig in %post and
> %preun sections in spec file, rpmlint prints errors:
> postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc
Hi,
I'm working on systemd unit file for ypbind and found some problems,
that I'm not sure about:
1) if I use systemctl enable/disable instead of chkconfig in %post and
%preun sections in spec file, rpmlint prints errors:
postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypbind
preun-without-chkconfig
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:38 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:23 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com) said:
> > > So that's the rough plan. Comments appreciated if I'm overlooking
> > > anything.
> >
> > The question would be how we ensure that the
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 19:26 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 11.4.2011 17:33, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > O rly? Are you *sure*?
>
> Well, as much as I could be sure that reading of XML file with libxml is
> risc-free process (yes, I think it is). OTOH, your decision is not
> cost-free either .
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-04-13)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:03 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-04-13/fesco.2011-04-13-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
On 4/12/11 11:58 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 09:12 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> Basically all of this hardware is, ahem, inept. The most featureful
>> device supported by these drivers would be the MGA G550, which just
>> barely manages to do DirectX 7 (comparable to a Radeon 7000 or GeFo
On 4/13/11 10:25 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 12.4.2011 18:12, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
>> negative.) The list of video drivers that see any actual use is
>> probably something like:
>>
>> ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
>> qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
>
>
On 4/13/11 11:02 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On 4/13/11 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> ... should we work on making qemu/kvm default to something more
>>> modern/sane?
>>> (qxl, vmware?) Does it not end up mattering (or do we need cirrus for
>>>
On 04/13/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 4/13/11 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> ... should we work on making qemu/kvm default to something more
>> modern/sane?
>> (qxl, vmware?) Does it not end up mattering (or do we need cirrus for
>> legacy OS support)?
>
> It ends up being a functi
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:00:08PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 4/6/2011 11:11, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
> > As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
> > figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
> >
> > With that said I have a simple Pytho
Dne 12.4.2011 18:12, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
> negative.) The list of video drivers that see any actual use is
> probably something like:
>
> ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
> qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
A word from your Xorg bugmaster. I think even this
On 04/13/2011 04:31 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> I think that is the wrong attitude! Because at some point it is going to break
> and the poor enduser is going to have no idea why. This is the Microsoft
> attitude.
Implementation details are usually something that upstream developers
worry about more
On 4/13/11 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> ... should we work on making qemu/kvm default to something more modern/sane?
> (qxl, vmware?) Does it not end up mattering (or do we need cirrus for
> legacy OS support)?
It ends up being a function of the guest OS - vmware's Windows driver
will refus
On 01/10/10 09:26, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> commit 29e9c5e6c9749506b3718757acf3069d1f7bab33
> Author: Marcela Mašláňová
> Date: Fri Oct 1 09:25:49 2010 +0200
>
> Filter *.so at the start of spec.
>
> perl.spec | 68
> +---
> 1 f
Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com) said:
> On 4/13/11 5:14 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > On 04/12/2011 06:12 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
> >> qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
> >
> > Would this affect the way KVM and specifically qemu-kvm in it
On 4/13/11 5:14 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 06:12 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
>> qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
>
> Would this affect the way KVM and specifically qemu-kvm in it's default
> setup for video using the cirrus driv
On 2011-04-13 10:03:22 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 08:44:00AM +0400, Aurora Oaks wrote:
>
>
>
> As well as making it to the list, the subject line of this email is
> currently appearing on http://start.fedoraproject.org/ This is probably
> not a good thing.
Hi, this shoud
On 04/13/2011 03:26 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 06:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 04/13/2011 06:47 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>> commit 7986a8567a9dbb2a6f8187b91a021d5ad350f96f
>>> Author: Christopher Aillon
>>> Date: Tue Apr 12 18:15:07 2011 -0700
>>>
>>> Default
On 04/12/2011 06:12 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> There are two major package classes in Fedora that provide graphics
> drivers: xorg-x11-drv-*, and mesa-dri-drivers-*.
>
> In F15, mesa-dri-drivers now only includes drivers with DRI2 support
> (radeon, nvidia, intel) and the software renderer; if you w
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 08:44:00AM +0400, Aurora Oaks wrote:
As well as making it to the list, the subject line of this email is
currently appearing on http://start.fedoraproject.org/ This is probably
not a good thing.
Ewan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
On 04/12/2011 06:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 06:47 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> commit 7986a8567a9dbb2a6f8187b91a021d5ad350f96f
>> Author: Christopher Aillon
>> Date: Tue Apr 12 18:15:07 2011 -0700
>>
>> Default browser is no longer read from prefs
>>
>> It's read f
46 matches
Mail list logo
