> they say on Debian and Ubuntu,
> all shared libs have 0644 permissions.
What they say is incorrect.
I have Ubuntu 10.10 i686:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1421892 2011-01-21 15:08 /lib/libc-2.12.1.so
I have Ubuntu 10.4 x86_64:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1405508 2011-01-21 14:25 /lib32/libc-2.11.1.so
-r
2011/3/24 Adam Williamson :
> So, I just ran into an interesting issue talking over Fedora patches
> with the upstream glew maintainer. glew installs its shared libraries
> 'manually', not using autotools / libtools; upstream installs them with
> permissions of 0644, and we patch this to 0755. Afte
Adam Williamson writes:
> So, is it true that the convention is 0644 in Debian and 0755 in Red
> Hat-land? If so, does anyone know why the difference, and if this needs
> to stay different forever? Also, I presume neither of us is patching
> several thousand shared library packages for this, so ar
So, I just ran into an interesting issue talking over Fedora patches
with the upstream glew maintainer. glew installs its shared libraries
'manually', not using autotools / libtools; upstream installs them with
permissions of 0644, and we patch this to 0755. After talking to
upstream, they say they
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> >> If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
> >> the private firefox4 repository on
>Or you can simply download it direct from mozil
Compose started at Wed Mar 23 13:15:51 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
On 03/23/2011 08:36 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>>> If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
>>> the private firefox4 repository on
>>>
>
>
>Or you can simply download it direct from mozilla.org
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>> If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
>> the private firefox4 repository on
>>
Or you can simply download it direct from mozilla.org and install it
in /usr/local/
--
devel mailing list
devel@
Kevin Kofler writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ser's problem is
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfl
>> which looks to me to be a flex incompatibility unrelated to mysql.
> Probably needs BR flex-static.
Yup, you're right. It's been FTBFS for awhile:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660932
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
> the private firefox4 repository on
>
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/firefox4
There's also Remi Collet's repository:
http://blog.famillecollet.com/
Spot's firefox4 repository provides a para
Tom Lane wrote:
> ser's problem is
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfl
> which looks to me to be a flex incompatibility unrelated to mysql.
Probably needs BR flex-static.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am Mittwoch, den 23.03.2011, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Jochen Schmitt:
> Perhaps, we have luck and get a so-called 'Feature Repository'.
I'm working on that...
> If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
> the private firefox4 repository on
>
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:46:07 Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> For KDE-4.6 we have the same situation. In this case you can
> get it from the http://apt.kde-redhat.com which is maintained
> by Rex Dieter.
It is .org not .com
The url is
http://apt.kde-redhat.org
--
José Abílio
--
devel mail
2011/3/23 Jochen Schmitt :
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 23.03.2011 22:35, schrieb Joshua C.:
>> fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
>> "being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
>> will ever get the latest firefox
2011/3/23 Nathaniel McCallum :
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
>> > "being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the lat
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 04:31:44 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> pure-ftpd's problem is
> libpureftpd.a(libpureftpd_a-log_mysql.o): In function `pw_mysql_check':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/pure-ftpd-1.0.29/src/log_mysql.c:454: undefined
> reference to `make_scrambled_password'
>
> which I'm not sure about
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
> > "being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
> > will ever get the latest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.03.2011 22:35, schrieb Joshua C.:
> fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
> "being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
> will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
>
At first, you mean 'Fedora was
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
> "being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
> will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
>
> Recompilation of the packages from f15 is not su
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
"being on the edge" etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
Recompilation of the packages from f15 is not such a good option.
--jason
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?= writes:
> The F-15 and rawhide rebuilds are finished now with some failures
Thanks for that!
> collectd
> gmyth
> grass (f15 only)
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
> mapserver (f15 only)
> pure-ftpd
> ser
> snort
> zoneminder (Jason knows about it)
I looked through the
commit 9403b105734b28995c3e7a4ba888c31b57b69fb7
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:18:00 2011 -0400
initial package
perl-Pango.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
commit 3bf43091d4b9fb9caa9f5ed080b93e5023f9dc10
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:17:26 2011 -0400
initial package
perl-Pango.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
commit d9c406b67ffb4f7542e8e87d2537f701c20f19db
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:10:21 2011 -0400
initial package
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Pango.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 62 insertio
commit 0c72a3a733b1879f50596620a36c38e2dcf6a119
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:03:30 2011 -0400
1.223
perl-Glib.spec | 19 +++
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Glib.spec b/perl-Glib.spec
in
On 03/23/2011 11:19 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> Bodhi comments were enabled earlier today in AutoQA and as some have
> noticed, old updates are being tagged as failed even though they have
> already been pushed to stable updates.
>
> We are aware of the issue and are working on it. We will send out
> a
"Gregory P. Ennis" writes:
> To All,
> I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
> related to an update of libtiff.
> Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
> Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a security fix
> for
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:30:10 -0500,
"Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
>
> You can make a comment on the bug which will add you to the CC and then
> when a build is made it will add a comment to that bug informing you of
> a new build to test. Then you can upgrade to the test build and provide
>
Ive not used snort in ages and not really had time to maintain it. im going to
orphan it in pkgdb if no one picks it up in a week ill retire it
it needs a bit of work as its an odd beast
> snort
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
Dan Horák píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 17:30 +0100:
> Tom Lane píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 12:27 -0400:
> > Marcela Maslanova writes:
> > > Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be
> > > needed mass rebuild.
> >
> > Of course, all these packages need to be rebuilt in rawhi
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
> today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
> minimum, ideally also devel and fpl and rbergeron.
OK, we're doing this meeting in #fedora-meet
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 02:16:13 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
> today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
> minimum, ideally also devel and fpl and rbergeron.
>
> FESCo voted today to ship NetworkM
Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
minimum, ideally also devel and fpl and rbergeron.
FESCo voted today to ship NetworkManager 0.9 with a compatibility
fallback for the 0.8 API so knetworkmanage
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-03-23)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-03-23/fesco.2011-03-23-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
Le 23/03/2011 17:28, Dan Horák a écrit :
> thanks for info, mysql-workbench will be skipped
mysql-workbench-5.2.33b-1.fc15 tagged in dist-f15-mysql
(and, of course, rawhide)
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ons 2011-03-23 klockan 12:11 -0400 skrev Marcela Maslanova:
> Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
> mass rebuild.
>
> dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
> one big update, so please don't file your own updates into
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690115
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit af4d1d63a2e1ff1c41d438c3df8c85732b03b480
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Mar 23 18:22:20 2011 +0100
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility.spec | 53 +++
sources |1 +
3 file
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility:
30d38d6106380333d12159604281cd62 Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
commit 3411a46048da96be00bcd30d40c7ddb416202c00
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Mar 23 18:19:29 2011 +0100
6.02 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Message.spec | 13 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --gi
Bodhi comments were enabled earlier today in AutoQA and as some have
noticed, old updates are being tagged as failed even though they have
already been pushed to stable updates.
We are aware of the issue and are working on it. We will send out
another email once the issue has been resolved.
Tim
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 01:48 +0800, Yin Qiu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm Yin from China. As the subject line says, I'd like to apply for
> the summer project of adding automatic repo discovery for yum. I've
> personally contacted Roland McGrath, who is supposed to be the mentor
> for this project, and he t
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:30:10 -0500,
"Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
>
> You can make a comment on the bug which will add you to the CC and then
> when a build is made it will add a comment to that bug informing you of
> a new build to test. Then you can upgrade to the test build and provide
>
Tom Lane píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 12:27 -0400:
> Marcela Maslanova writes:
> > Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
> > mass rebuild.
>
> Of course, all these packages need to be rebuilt in rawhide too.
> I don't think dhorak is offering to do that, so if
Remi Collet píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 17:20 +0100:
> Le 23/03/2011 17:11, Marcela Maslanova a écrit :
>
> > dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be
> > created
>
> > mysql-workbench
>
>
> Please don't build this one which is FTBFS for now (gcc 4.6 issue).
>
> I'
Marcela Maslanova writes:
> Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
> mass rebuild.
Of course, all these packages need to be rebuilt in rawhide too.
I don't think dhorak is offering to do that, so if you own one of
them, please do launch a rawhide build.
Richard Shaw writes:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> This would be more appropriate on fedora-devel (any follow-up questions
>> should go there).
>>
>> Basically, you rebuild a package when there is a good reason to rebuild
>> it. You've made packaging changes or you pu
Le 23/03/2011 17:11, Marcela Maslanova a écrit :
> dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
> mysql-workbench
Please don't build this one which is FTBFS for now (gcc 4.6 issue).
I'm working on it, and should build it ASAP.
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
de
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
one big update, so please don't file your own updates into bodhi.
List of all dependent packages:
repoquery --whatrequires 'li
"Nathanael D. Noblet" writes:
> On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> I've built proftpd for the dist-f15-mysql target; I think it would be
>> best to at least bundle that with other related updates rather than me
>> and other maintainers creating our own updates.
> So I've built my depe
- Original Message -
> From: "Nathanael D. Noblet"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:24:36 PM
> Subject: Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream
> On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Ja
"Gregory P. Ennis" writes:
> To All,
> I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
> related to an update of libtiff.
> Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
> Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a security fix
> for
> To All,
>
> I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
> related to an update of libtiff.
>
> Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
>
> Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a security fix
> for CVE-2011-0192 that was fo
On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jaroslav Reznik writes:
>>> Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
>>> thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
>>
>> Yeah, I submitted an update request a co
On 03/23/2011 09:11 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> To All,
>
> I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
> related to an update of libtiff.
>
> Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
>
> Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught b
To All,
I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
related to an update of libtiff.
Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a security fix
for CVE-2011-0192 that was found to be inc
On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik writes:
>> Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
>> thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
>
> Yeah, I submitted an update request a couple days ago without realizing
> that it should not
Am 23.03.2011 14:54, schrieb Tom Lane:
> Jaroslav Reznik writes:
>> Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
>> thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
>
> Yeah, I submitted an update request a couple days ago without realizing
> that it shou
Jaroslav Reznik writes:
> Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
> thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
Yeah, I submitted an update request a couple days ago without realizing
that it should not have been filed yet, and it looks like som
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Richard Shaw said:
>> I see regularly where new(er) users wonder why they see packages
>> installed with dist tags from previous versions of Fedora.
>>
>> I understand why this occurs but now that I've gotten into building
>>
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 01:09:44 PM Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:54:54 PM Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > > 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
> > >> On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >>> I wrote:
> > The ticke
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:54:54 PM Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
> >> On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I wrote:
> The ticket is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
>
> >>>
On 03/23/2011 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
>> On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>>> 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> The ticket is here:
>> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
>
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
>>> On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
> The ticket is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
> You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide.
On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
>> On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I wrote:
The ticket is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
>>>
You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket
F-15 build
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> The ticket is here:
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
>>
>>> You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket
>>> F-15 builds should be done with "fedpkg build --target=dist-f15-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.81 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690116
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.81 is available
Product: Fedora
We are behind schedule on Release Notes. Most of the wiki beats have
been updated, at least for key features.
If you have been working on a beat, please review it and set the "Wiki
Good" indicator to 1 if you think it is OK on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats
If you ar
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> The ticket is here:
>> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
>
>> You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket
>> F-15 builds should be done with "fedpkg build --target=dist-f15-mysql"
>
> As of right now that targ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690115
Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-Listing-6.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690114
Summary: perl-File-Listing-6.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Changing gtk_key_theme to 'Emacs' on up-to-date F15 Gnome 2.91 seems
to have no effect. Is this by design or should I file a bug?
Mikko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:32 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I routinely encrypt all important partitions on my laptops /
> > workstations / servers using LUKS both at home and at work.
> > However, due to the above, I c
A soname bumping directfb update is coming to F-14 soon. xine-lib is
its only dependency in Fedora and will be pushed in the same update.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14,xine-lib-1.1.19-2.fc14.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673842
--
devel mailing li
74 matches
Mail list logo
