Hi,
I am a developer with the enlightenment project (http://enlightenment.org). We
have just recently released the 1.0 version of our libraries, known as the EFL,
and are now attempting to find people on various distros to help spread the
word. Currently, we have packagers working on Arch, Debian,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Recently,
>
> we noticed that firstboot now has a checkbox to give admin privileges to
> the first user. It does so by adding the user to the wheel group, which
> unfortunately, doesn't do much [1] for PolicyKit, which was using a
> differe
Compose started at Thu Mar 17 13:16:01 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
2011/3/17 Jason L Tibbitts III
>
> > "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes:
>
> SB> I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't
> SB> received a notification yet.
>
> Well, you made your request just after I had processed the queue
> yesterday and chose to complain before I had proce
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 03:30:23PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > This probably should have been a "proper" F15 feature.
> Not really disagreeing there.
Yeah. It's something I've been agitating for since way before there _was_ a
features process [1][2], and some of the pieces are just kind of f
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> For something like that, I would follow something like plplot and just copy
> the matlab directory (renaming it) to /usr/share/octave/site/m/Csdp. That
> should work.
I'll give that a try. Thanks a lot for your help.
--
Jerry James
http
On 03/17/2011 02:50 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Hmm, this really was only intended for packaging octave packages like those
>> at the octave forge site http://octave.sourceforge.net/. Those do conform
>> to the standard for octave packages t
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Hmm, this really was only intended for packaging octave packages like those
> at the octave forge site http://octave.sourceforge.net/. Those do conform
> to the standard for octave packages though. Can you post a srpm? I might
> be able
On 03/17/2011 02:07 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> - New octave packaging guidelines have been submitted to the FPC. I think
>> there were some questions, but I haven't been contacted directly.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDra
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> - New octave packaging guidelines have been submitted to the FPC. I think
> there were some questions, but I haven't been contacted directly.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Octave
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Colin Walters said:
>> The point is that that in the default flow now, you get both; and
>> there is no plan to change this; correct?
>
> If you don't have a root password, how do you log in for single-user
> mode, manual fsc
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
> > It would clearly match doing so for pkexec, but would then be bizarre
> > because the Fedora installer still asks you to make up a root
> > password. The whole thing is really a mess without any plan for where
> > things are going.
> >
> > Is there any pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684996
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486083&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486083&action=edit
Description: When nsslapd-subtree-rename-switch is on,
a tombstone entry has a special RDN which looks like this:
On 03/17/2011 12:41 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Colin Walters píše v Čt 17. 03. 2011 v 13:45 -0400:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>> Are we turning on the wheel group in sudo?
>>
>> It would clearly match doing so for pkexec, but would then be bizarre
>> because th
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Colin Walters said:
>> The point is that that in the default flow now, you get both; and
>> there is no plan to change this; correct?
>
> If you don't have a root password, how do you log in for single-user
> mode, manual fsc
Colin Walters píše v Čt 17. 03. 2011 v 13:45 -0400:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >
> > Are we turning on the wheel group in sudo?
>
> It would clearly match doing so for pkexec, but would then be bizarre
> because the Fedora installer still asks you to make up a roo
Once upon a time, Colin Walters said:
> The point is that that in the default flow now, you get both; and
> there is no plan to change this; correct?
If you don't have a root password, how do you log in for single-user
mode, manual fsck, etc.? AFAIK those only prompt for the root password,
not a
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> So, it looks like the second two bits weren't properly cloned/communicated.
> Design of this appears to have been 'firstboot maintainer + people CC'd on
> the bug.'
Okay...
> Changing the root password screen wasn't mentioned as part of
On 03/17/2011 11:48 AM, José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 05 February 2011 21:11:34 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> I'm planning on dropping libnc-dap. It is no longer supported and
>> functionality has moved into the netcdf 4 library.
>>
>> The only package currently requiring libnc-dap is:
>>
>> octave-
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >
> > Are we turning on the wheel group in sudo?
>
> It would clearly match doing so for pkexec, but would then be bizarre
> because the Fedora installer still asks you to make up a root
> passwor
On Saturday 05 February 2011 21:11:34 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm planning on dropping libnc-dap. It is no longer supported and
> functionality has moved into the netcdf 4 library.
>
> The only package currently requiring libnc-dap is:
>
> octave-forge-0:20090607-17.fc14.i686
>
> Also, apparen
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> Are we turning on the wheel group in sudo?
It would clearly match doing so for pkexec, but would then be bizarre
because the Fedora installer still asks you to make up a root
password. The whole thing is really a mess without any plan fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/2011 12:21 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Recently,
>
> we noticed that firstboot now has a checkbox to give admin privileges to
> the first user. It does so by adding the user to the wheel group, which
> unfortunately, doesn't do much [1] for
Alle giovedì 17 marzo 2011, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
> On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim
>
> wrote:
> > I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
>
> It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've
> dropped the hal and gnome-vfs2 deps
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:16 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
>
> It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've
> dropped the hal and gnome-vfs2 deps
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> The same way. See bug #684125.
Thanks for the pointer. I'll relabel my system and see if this weird
prelink thing goes away.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
I'm sorry but it is not finished yet. There were some problems with
rebuilds of some packages. There is one remaining rebuild I need to do.
I have contacted maintainer and hopefully will be able to push the
update tomorrow.
Regards
Marek
On 03/04/2011 03:30 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I p
Jerry James (loganje...@gmail.com) said:
> I found some files with incorrect SELinux labels. So I did the usual
> "touch /.autorelabel" and reboot ... and the relabeling didn't happen.
> On Fedora 14, this is handled by /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, owned by the
> initscripts package. There is no such
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 09:46 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Hmm. This looks completely correct.
> >
> > I don't really understand why this check suceeds if you run it in
> > "systemd-notify --booted", but apparently doesn't if you run it
Recently,
we noticed that firstboot now has a checkbox to give admin privileges to
the first user. It does so by adding the user to the wheel group, which
unfortunately, doesn't do much [1] for PolicyKit, which was using a
different group to identify the Administrator role.
To fix this disconnect
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Hmm. This looks completely correct.
>
> I don't really understand why this check suceeds if you run it in
> "systemd-notify --booted", but apparently doesn't if you run it in
> telinit.
>
> Hmm, do you have SELinux enabled? Maybe SElinux
> "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes:
SB> I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't
SB> received a notification yet.
Well, you made your request just after I had processed the queue
yesterday and chose to complain before I had processed the queue this
morning.
SB> I'm not in a
Hi Fedora devel community :)
I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't received a
notification yet. I'm not in a hurry but on earlier requests I had receive
answer after a few hours:
The ticket is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683684
TIA
--
--
Sergio Belkin
Hello,
I am orphaning galeon on F15 and Rawhide. Unless someone picks it up in
a week I'll retire it.
Currently it doesn't build or work with xulrunner-2. Even if it gets
ported, it will soon bump into the anticipated gnome-vfs2 retirement.
For the few remaining users like myself its currently po
2011/3/16 Dariusz J. Garbowski :
> On 16/03/11 01:03 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/3/16 Jeff Moyer:
>>> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>>>
2011/3/16 Jeff Moyer:
> Out of curiosity, what SSD do you have?
ocz vertex 2
>>>
>>> OK, haven't tested those.
>>
>> So far, I can not say
On Thursday, 17 March 2011 at 07:48, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Do you mean foo2* packages from RPMFusion? :)
>
> I mean a drop-in replacement for the hplip-plugin based on the foo2* code,
> or even just on jbigkit, depending on how the hplip code is structure
On 03/17/2011 12:12 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Correction:
> python-nltk
This one is already primarily maintained by Robin Lee; I'm just a
comaintainer except for the RHEL 4 branch which I've now retired.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mai
I'm no longer using some applications, and they'd be in better hands at
someone who uses them more:
gnome-applet-window-picker
libhildon
maximus
pychess
python-nltk
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against prop
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 18:30 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui
> > wrote:Let me point to
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui
> wrote:Let me point to Bugzilla #684054.
>
> The F-14 preupgrade isn't p
On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've
dropped the hal and gnome-vfs2 deps from gimp in rawhide now.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Wednesday, March 16, 2011 06:36:53 pm Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:42 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> > retire them in rawhide.
> >
> > HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui wrote:Let me
> point to Bugzilla #684054.
>
> The F-14 preupgrade isn't patched yet, where can we find a fixed one?
>
> Nevermind. I read the Wiki and found the koji pointer.
--
G.Wolfe Woodb
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui wrote:
> Greetings everyone,
>
> Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow! It's available at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
>
> As you've noticed that install.img is included in initrd.img From F-15
> builds, the procedure of preupgr
44 matches
Mail list logo
