On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:39 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> easytag?
I've installed this. I'll have a look at it to see if it includes the
functionality that tagtool provides. We've taken over tagtool for the
time being :)
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
Compose started at Sun Mar 13 13:15:48 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 23:13 +0100 schrieb Matej Cepl:
> Dne 13.3.2011 20:39, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
> > easytag?
>
> Unfortunately, it is not a separate package.
$ rpm -qi easytag
Name: easytag Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 2.1.6
Dne 13.3.2011 20:39, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
> easytag?
Unfortunately, it is not a separate package.
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello list.
I'm trying to build an application that uses lazarus. It builds ok in
F-14 but fails in F-15 and rawhide.
This is a scratch build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2909255
The explicit error is this:
/usr/bin/ppcx64 -MObjFPC -Sgi
-Fu/usr/lib64/lazarus/packager/units
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so,
> is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of
> view?
It will probably take a bit of work to remove the gtk2 depreciated
cruft to get it working
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 16:06 -0800, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 03/12/2011 04:33 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > I believe it should be fixed with glibc-2.13.90-6, but the update is
> > currently stuck in Bodhi with 7 karma and not getting pushed even to the
> > requested updates-testing repo:
> > ht
Am Montag, den 14.03.2011, 01:10 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
> On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:15 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> > Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so,
> > is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of
> > view?
>
> Nope. None that I
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:15 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so,
> is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of
> view?
Nope. None that I can see. It really is an amazing tool and should be
available in the re
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
> > > * tagtool
>
> Seems to be dead, at least the homepage disappeared.
Well, that actually seems to be right, but maybe could be updated to
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tagtool/, though. But even with that,
upstream do
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 23:31 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
> On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 16:41 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> > > * meld
> > > * tagtool
> >
> > I've taken these two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :)
> >
> >
>
>
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 16:41 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> > * meld
> > * tagtool
>
> I've taken these two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :)
>
>
Hey!
I'd like to help co-maintain tagtool. I use it regularly :)
Should I apply
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 11:04 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
> I'm orphaning the following packages:
>
> * json-glib
I'm not sure if this would be better maintained alongside glib, but I
use this library and would happily [co]maintain it.
Thanks
Alex.
--
This message was scanned by Better Hos
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 16:41 +0100 schrieb Dominic Hopf:
> Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> > * meld
I have already applied for commit access.
> > * tagtool
Seems to be dead, at least the homepage disappeared.
Regards,
Christoph
--
devel mailin
> The following packages are in need of new owners:
>
> six
> glob2
I claimed both of these.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> * meld
> * tagtool
I've taken these two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :)
--
Dominic Hopf
http://dominichopf.de/
Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
Il giorno 13/mar/2011, alle ore 16.36, Sergio Belkin ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> AFAIK, this page is what you are looking for:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Procedure
You rock, thanks!
Andrea
--
devel mailing lis
2011/3/13 Andrea Veri :
>
> Il giorno 13/mar/2011, alle ore 16.04, Brian Pepple ha scritto:
>
>> * xchat-gnome
>
> I might be interested in adopting this package. I am not
> really used on how packages adoptions work in Fedora.
>
> I wasnt able to find a nice wiki page for that either, so it w
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 16:12:41 +0100,
Andrea Veri wrote:
>
> I might be interested in adopting this package. I am not
> really used on how packages adoptions work in Fedora.
>
> I wasnt able to find a nice wiki page for that either, so it would
> be great if someone could show me the right w
Il giorno 13/mar/2011, alle ore 16.04, Brian Pepple ha scritto:
> * xchat-gnome
I might be interested in adopting this package. I am not
really used on how packages adoptions work in Fedora.
I wasnt able to find a nice wiki page for that either, so it would
be great if someone could show m
Hi all,
I'm orphaning the following packages:
* json-glib - required for:
* clutter
* cheese
* couchdb-glib
* gnome-games
* libepc - required for:
* glom
* totem-publish
* libjingle- required for
21 matches
Mail list logo
