Compose started at Fri Mar 11 13:15:33 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
bugzilla-3.6.4-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(DBD::Oracle)
bugzilla-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-11 15:57:27 EST ---
dspam-3.9.0-17.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stab
On 03/11/2011 12:18 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Ralf Ertzinger said:
this document is about a quite special case (regarding lawfully binding
digital signatures) and not about SSL in general.
I took a short look at software support for other SSL hashes:
- OpenSSL: openssl only off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There will be an outage starting at 2011-03-16 03:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 6 hours. [Outages should be only 10-30 minutes long but
the window for the outage is 6 hours thus the large window.]
To convert UTC to your local time, take a lo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668909
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483808&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483808&action=edit
Description: Code to modify nsds5ReplicaPort in replication agreement
was not implemented. This patch adds it.
Whe
Once upon a time, Ralf Ertzinger said:
> this document is about a quite special case (regarding lawfully binding
> digital signatures) and not about SSL in general.
I took a short look at software support for other SSL hashes:
- OpenSSL: openssl only offers md5, sha1, md2, mdc2, md4 for generati
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:37:39PM +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:22:55 +0100, Till Maas wrote
>
> > I assume he meant since Januar 2011. This is at least the official
> > statement for Germany:
> >
> > http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/QES/Veroeffentl
Hi.
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:22:55 +0100, Till Maas wrote
> I assume he meant since Januar 2011. This is at least the official
> statement for Germany:
>
> http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/QES/Veroeffentlichungen/Algorithmen/algorithmen_node.html
> http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/cae
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:44:55AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Pisar said:
> > This year? In Europe we are over. All quallified CA's are forbiden to
> > issue SHA-1 certificates since begin of 2010.
>
> Cite? https://europa.eu/ uses SHA-1 on a cert issued in February 2010.
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Beta blocker review
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-11/f-15-beta-blocker-review.2011-03-11-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.
On 03/11/2011 10:58 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
> Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 14:58:03, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
>> On 03/11/2011 08:12 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I trying to update kicad but the built fails with a ld error:
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2903979
>>
On 03/11/2011 09:44 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Cite? https://europa.eu/ uses SHA-1 on a cert issued in February 2010.
> Of course, they also haven't disabled the weak SSL ciphers, so it's hard
> to claim high security.
On my systems all I get is a blank page saying:
Access Denied (policy_denie
Adam,
thanks for the very comprehensive explanation.
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Jackson [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 11. März 2011 17:28
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Cc: Christian Weiß
> Subject: Re: Request for sponsered development...
>
>[skipp
On 03/11/2011 05:07 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. My stalled review requests are:
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652543 - erlang-riak_client
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/680488 - erlang-basho_stats
>
> This review is different - it depends on previous
On 3/11/11 8:01 AM, Christian Weiß wrote:
> Since AIGLX is a Fedora project, I hope that anyone here is able to
> provide me with further technical information about the protocol and
> the architecture - haven't found anything so far. As mentioned,
> whatever comes out of this I'll gladly contribu
Hello!
I would like to swap reviews. My stalled review requests are:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652543 - erlang-riak_client
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/680488 - erlang-basho_stats
This review is different - it depends on previous one (erlang-basho_stats):
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/6525
Hi Bill,
It's for all branches I currently maintain. It's a major upgrade, but
maintaining backwards-compatibility.
I created a block request ticket here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4523
--Marek
On 2011-03-11, at 17:04, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Marek Goldmann (mgold...@r
Marek Goldmann (mgold...@redhat.com) said:
> I just retired following packages:
>
> * rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin
> * rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin
> * rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fedora-os-plugin
> * rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin
> * rubygem-boxgrind
Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 14:58:03, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
> On 03/11/2011 08:12 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I trying to update kicad but the built fails with a ld error:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2903979
> > and I don't succeed to fix it.
> >
> > Can
Hi,
I just retired following packages:
* rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin
* rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin
* rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fedora-os-plugin
* rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin
* rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin
* rubygem-boxgrinder-bui
On 03/11/2011 12:29 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 08:25 AM, William Cohen wrote:
>> git repo at:
>>
>> http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=wcohen/public_git/memstomp;a=summary
>
> Actually: git clone
> git://fedorapeople.org/home/fedora/wcohen/public_git/memstomp
>
> The implementation has
commit cc3cb9a7e56cb36379d6c7fdee1012773d3ccde7
Author: Steven Pritchard
Date: Fri Mar 11 08:47:02 2011 -0600
- Update to 1.00.
- Update build dependencies:
+ Archive::Tar >= 1.44
+ ExtUtils::Install >= 1.52
+ ExtUtils::ParseXS >= 2.19
+ JSON >= 2.14
+ LWP:
Once upon a time, Petr Pisar said:
> This year? In Europe we are over. All quallified CA's are forbiden to
> issue SHA-1 certificates since begin of 2010.
Cite? https://europa.eu/ uses SHA-1 on a cert issued in February 2010.
Of course, they also haven't disabled the weak SSL ciphers, so it's ha
Hi,
I have a strange problem in php -> sphinx communication:
Mar 11 14:59:57 symfony [err] {Exception} searchd error: client
version is higher than daemon version (client is v.1.23, daemon is
v.1.22)
My system is based on F14 (with small changes) - because I had to use
MySQL 5.5 I had to build P
I will take griffith and stow
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Vivek Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>I have orphaned a few packages owing to lack of time and non-usage.
>
> 1. struts
> 2. griffith
> 3. xqf
> 4. gquilt
> 5. quilt
> 6. stow
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Vivek
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2011 08:12 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I trying to update kicad but the built fails with a ld error:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2903979
> and I don't succeed to fix it.
>
> Can somebody help me?
Looks like yo
Hi,
I trying to update kicad but the built fails with a ld error:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2903979
and I don't succeed to fix it.
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Alain
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
Petr,
to a certain extent, yes, VirtualGL is doing that.
However, VirtualGL is using VNC as the transport medium but I'd like to have a
tighter integration with the Xorg architecture, otherwise Windows are bound the
the VNC client space. Moreover, compression/decompression is handled by the CPU
Hi,
I'm interested is there IPC Benchmark test for Linux?
Regards
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10 March 2011 22:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:40:09AM +, Mat Booth wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 06:37, Sven Lankes wrote:
>> > After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a
>> > huge number of packages.
>> >
>>
>> Must have been some dispu
On Monday, 28 February 2011 at 19:23, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Hedayat Vatankhah (hedayat@gmail.com) said:
> > Is it possible to depend on a group instead of a package at all?
>
> No.
It is, however, possible to depend on virtual "package" which may be
provided by multiple real packages and
On 2011-03-10, Robert Relyea wrote:
> SHA-1 is also used in the certificate. That, in theory, doesn't require
> TLS 1.2, though only TLS 1.2 includes protocol to tell servers what
> hashing algorithms the clients support, so in a strict sense only TLS
> tells you whether or not it's safe to use a
33 matches
Mail list logo
