Various SSL keys are aging out so we will be updating them before anyone
gets a page.
We have already updated fedorahosted.org and will now be updating the
cert for the main site: fedoraproject.org.
The old certificate came from Equifax, was a 1024 bit key and had the
fingerprint:
SHA1 Fingerpr
Hi,
Jonathan Robie and I are planning to update xerces-c from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1
in Rawhide, which includes a soname bump; F-15 will stay on 3.0.1.
I will handle the rebuilds of affected packages:
blahtexml-0.8-2.fc15
cegui-0.7.5-5.fc15
enigma-1.01-12
frepple-0.8.1-3.fc15
gdal-1.7.3-2.fc15
glest-3.2
Sven Lankes wrote:
> newsbeuter
I'll take this.
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
On 03/09/2011 11:58 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Currently, this is disabled in rawhide as it is linking to the gtkhtml3 API.
>
> Does anyone know if this ban has been lifted yet or is the mono stack
> going to be hobbled because of it for a while longer? (no
> gnome-desktop-sharp == no mono-too
Hi,
Currently, this is disabled in rawhide as it is linking to the gtkhtml3 API.
Does anyone know if this ban has been lifted yet or is the mono stack going
to be hobbled because of it for a while longer? (no gnome-desktop-sharp ==
no mono-tools == no monodevelop and so on...)
TTFN
Paul
--
dev
Hi,
I've just submitted mono-2.10.1 for building and it's failed giving me
make[8]: Entering directory
`/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-2.10.1/mcs/tools/gacutil'
MCS [basic] gacutil.exe
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 623: _dl_map_object_deps:
Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!
I had this
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-03-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings folks!
What use is an Alpha, if we didn't follow it up with a Beta?
The Beta blocker review meetings start this Friday at high-noon (EST) in
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:40:49PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I don't see what would require you to package every piece of
> functionality included in a upstream tarball. Certainly you should
> include sufficient comments in the spec to make the situation obvious.
> Just be mindful that
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:33:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Whoever wants to package this will also need to check the tarball for
> patent-encumbered stuff, e.g. there are tools working on MP3 files, you have
> to check whether there's any MP3 code bundled (which would have to be
> removed)
I've orphaned "abicheck" for F-15 and Rawhide.
If nobody wants to take it, I plan to retire it in about a week. It's
likely that nobody uses it anymore, so better not take it if you don't use
it either. ;)
Upstream has been inactive for a very long time (= years) and has not
even merged patches.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:49:41 +0100
Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> Since I'm not able to give MogileFS the attention it deserves anymore,
> I'd like to orphan it, including its dependencies.
>
> Those are the following packages:
...
> perl-IO-AIO
I'll take that one unless existing co-maintainer kwizart
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-03-09)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-03-09/fesco.2011-03-09-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
Hello,
I'm really glad we successfully finished our internationalization and
localization testing marathon for these release cycle. I'm also glad to
see that some bugs are already closed or modified. For Fedora 15 the
intention was to arrange these Test Days earlier than we did for Fedora
14 becau
Hi,
I have orphaned a few packages owing to lack of time and non-usage.
1. struts
2. griffith
3. xqf
4. gquilt
5. quilt
6. stow
Thanks and Regards,
Vivek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> I wonder why there is no netinst image on nightly-composes
>> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
>> ?
>>
>> Would it be a problem to create nightly such image?
> I believe it is no longer needed, as we make one in the branched compose.
>
> http://download.fedoraproject.org/
2011/3/9 Jesse Keating :
> On 3/9/11 9:17 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder why there is no netinst image on nightly-composes
>> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
>> ?
>>
>> Would it be a problem to create nightly such image?
>>
>>
>
> I believe it is no longer
Since I'm not able to give MogileFS the attention it deserves anymore,
I'd like to orphan it, including its dependencies.
Those are the following packages:
perl-mogilefs-server
perl-Sys-Syscall
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders
perl-MogileFS-Utils
perl-MogileFS-Client
perl-Gearman-Server
perl-Gearman-C
On 3/9/11 9:17 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder why there is no netinst image on nightly-composes
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
> ?
>
> Would it be a problem to create nightly such image?
>
>
I believe it is no longer needed, as we make one in the branched
Hi,
I wonder why there is no netinst image on nightly-composes
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
?
Would it be a problem to create nightly such image?
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On 3/8/11 8:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> The biggest issue I see in that is that most thin style corp
> deployments now days are moving towards (or at least looking closely
> at) a VDI style deployment and most of those techs don't support 3D
> either.
From a (very) cursory look at Windows 7,
On 03/09/2011 10:06 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 08:05:49PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On 03/08/2011 06:46 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>>> guile-2.0.0 has been released, there are some important changes.
>>>
>>> - The license changed from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+.
>>
>> Looks
I've been asked to package apache-solr [1] in Fedora. This is a java
library and webapp posing as a frontend to lucene for searching.
Packaging java jars is not a problem, but there are more problems with
webapp part. I made it into subpackage apache-solr-webapp. Ant build
creates war file (basica
List,
I'd like to inform you about upcoming netcat 1.100 update in Rawhide (and in
F15, if everything goes well). Although, there should be no issues with this
update, please test your packages using it. This should be interesting for
(at least) the following:
freenx-server
lbd
ldm
libvirt
mldonk
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 08:05:49PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 06:46 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > guile-2.0.0 has been released, there are some important changes.
> >
> > - The license changed from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+.
>
> Looks like that could cause some licensing issues:
>
> ge
nucleo wrote:
> There are some other packages was orphaned today by thomasj:
>
> e_dbus
> ecore
> edje
> eet
> efreet
> embryo
> enlightenment
> epeg
> epsilon
> evas
> ewl
> freeciv
>
Took freeciv. Also, if none of the co-maintainers of
SDL_(net,ttf,image,mixer) want to own them, I'll take th
There are some other packages was orphaned today by thomasj:
e_dbus
ecore
edje
eet
efreet
embryo
enlightenment
epeg
epsilon
evas
ewl
freeciv
libeina
skrooge
Alexey Kurov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Some intels about the *mm modules orphaned (in short, they should just die).
> libgnomemm26
> lignomeuimm26
only required by gcdmaster and referencer. gcdmaster comes from
cdrdao and does not seem actively maintained, referencer is looking
for a new upstream maintainer and seriously needs some re
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:37:56AM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a
> huge number of packages.
>
> I extracted the list from scm-commits emails so I hope that I haven't
> missed any.
>
> The following packages are in need of new own
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 07:37:56 +0100, Sven wrote:
> After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a
> huge number of packages.
>
> I extracted the list from scm-commits emails so I hope that I haven't
> missed any.
>
> The following packages are in need of new owners:
> libex
On 03/09/2011 12:07 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
> After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a
> huge number of packages.
It is possible to bring this up to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group and try and
resolve the problem, whatever that might be?
Rahul
I am orphaning decibel-audio-player. It is a audio player written in Python
and uses Gtk+ and GStreamer. Rakesh Pandit is already the co-maintainer, so if
any one is interested in helping him then please apply for co-maintainership.
Regards,
Debarshi
pgpdqB8TY0qjX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
32 matches
Mail list logo
