On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like to
> garner some opinions before the final spin.
>
> Currently, there is a mono-4-preview sub-package which is an optional extra.
> The .NET 4 stuff is pretty sta
Compose started at Mon Mar 7 13:15:32 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.9-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-3.15.so.19()(64bit)
Hi,
On 7 March 2011 22:18, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like
> to
> > garner some opinions before the final spin.
> >
>
> Was Mono ever split into the ECMA and non-
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like to
> garner some opinions before the final spin.
>
Was Mono ever split into the ECMA and non-ECMA components, as Miguel promised?
-c
--
devel mailing list
deve
Hi,
I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like to
garner some opinions before the final spin.
Currently, there is a mono-4-preview sub-package which is an optional extra.
The .NET 4 stuff is pretty stable now and I'm thinking of retiring the
sub-package and adding t
Compose started at Mon Mar 7 08:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
R-hdf5-1.6.9-10.fc15.x86_64 requires hdf5 = 0:1.8.5.patch1
audacious-plugin-xmp-3.3.0-6.fc15.x86_64 requires audacious(plugin-api)
= 0:17
byzan
commit 3c76dd54cf06b03b7b5f170370b4d13281afdaec
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Mar 7 17:26:09 2011 +0100
update to 0.10
.gitignore|1 +
perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable.spec | 14 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 inser
commit 5845731ed7c6467d942aad8052de06a284ec94ae
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Mar 7 17:23:54 2011 +0100
update to 0.09
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor.spec | 18 --
sources |2 +-
3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable:
7d7af140b575c7b1e32044e2876f6401 MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor:
36411224d28a62f83b33e19e5f683039 MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 3/7/11 11:15 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Shame on me.
> I forgot string.h and -Wall ;-)
>
> With the former and -O3, I do see your warning.
Shame on me as well, -O1 or better would be needed since otherwise
you're never going to hit the simplification logic that would introduce
this message.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:06:44AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> And build it with -c -save-temps, I don't get anything remotely like
> what you're getting in the .i file; the strcmp call is emitted
> unmolested. So I'm choosing to blame this on some other header
> you're including, and the easiest
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs:
b7f024919fce71b30bb25a9279ba31d7 Perl-Critic-Bangs-1.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> With the former and -O3, I do see your warning.
> Here's a pared-down test case:
>
> $ cat k.c
> #include
> void do_rm_rf (const char *p) { if (strcmp (p, "/") == 0) return; }
> $ gcc -Wall -O3 -c k.c -Werror=strict-o
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs:
1aa62449ce6b29bd2d00f5536577460e Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.108.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 3/7/11 10:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> Below is how the failure line expands(!)
>
> Thanks, I needed a laugh this morning.
>
> If I do this as a minimal testcase:
>
> ---
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int
> do_rm_rf (const char *path)
> {
>int r;
>char *bu
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:09:17PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I suspect that there was a problem with .11, perhaps one of these:
>
> * Fri Mar 04 2011 Jakub Jelinek 4.6.0-0.12
> - update from trunk
> - PRs c++/46159, c++/46282, c++/47200, c++/47774, c++/47851, c++/47950,
>
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
>
> error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1 cmp C2
> to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
>
> These seem to be associated with code that does 'if (strcmp (s1, s2) ==
On 3/7/11 10:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Below is how the failure line expands(!)
Thanks, I needed a laugh this morning.
If I do this as a minimal testcase:
---
#include
#include
int
do_rm_rf (const char *path)
{
int r;
char *buf, *err;
if (!strcmp(path, "/")) {
printf
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:37:20PM +0100, yersinia wrote:
> I remeber that gnu lib have a similar macro, and last year there was a
> fix
> http://old.nabble.com/-PATCH--define-STREQ%28a,-b%29-consistently,-removing-useless-parentheses-td27293621.html
I understand Jim's argument, although I think
On 03/07/2011 04:43 PM, Roman Rakus wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2890468
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> RR
I should read more before asking. The answer is: Missing one patch.
RR
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2890468
Any suggestions?
RR
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
>
> error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1 cmp C2
> to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
>
> These seem to be associated with code
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:14:57AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 3/7/11 9:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
> >
> >error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1
> >cmp C2 to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=stric
Hi,
Can I expect that the Atheros AR8152 v1.1 Fast Ethernet (wired) chipset
is working fine with F14?
I found http://blog.fridns.se/?p=43 and that all sounds a bit scary. But
http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/reports/view_device/AR8152%20v1.1%20Fast%20Ethernet
suggests that it's working ok for some
commit c185ce57fa8d83e9bd6a554f80cf776af2eb5dd3
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Mon Mar 7 16:04:37 2011 +0100
update to 1.113
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Perl-Critic.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --
On 3/7/11 9:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
>
> error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1
> cmp C2 to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
>
> These seem to be associated with code that does 'if (
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic:
20d2e7c73b68d21c08eff6ae4addd58d Perl-Critic-1.113.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Greetings everyone!
Tomorrow we will host the last Test Day of our L10N/I18N testing
marathon [1]. The L10N Desktop Test Day will focus on translations
quality in desktop applications, specially Fedora configuration tools.
Translators and contributors from around the world are invited to test
and
With some detours I finally arrived here.
I have a need out of a commercial project that may lead into some extensions
within AIGLX and Mesa. I'm going to describe the problem and I'm open for
whatever comes to your mind, even alternative approaches. If we (from a
technical perspective you folk
Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1 cmp C2 to
X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
These seem to be associated with code that does 'if (strcmp (s1, s2) == 0)'
For example:
dir.c: In functi
On 03/03/2011 09:03 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 12:42 PM, Will Woods wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:55 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Hi guys.
>>> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
>>> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
Alread
32 matches
Mail list logo
