When I was migrating ABRT to transifex.net I hit a problem with tx push,
so to ease the life of others who may hit the same problem here is my story:
1. created the project
2. created the resource by uploading the abrt.pot
3. outsource the project to Fedora Project
4. try to $ tx push -t
5. got "
On 03/03/2011 04:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing a weird issue with koji and rawhide/f16:
>
>
> When trying to build perl-Plack in koji, the f16 built fails:
> f16: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2881639
Having re-tried half a day later, building the identica
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680558
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=482147&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/03/2011 12:42 PM, Will Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:55 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
>> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
>
> One-line reproducer:
>
> case x"" in x) echo matches x;; x?) echo
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:55 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
One-line reproducer:
case x"" in x) echo matches x;; x?) echo matches x? but not x;; esac
I notice the bash-4.2 C
It's in need of feedback and karmic points (specially from proven testers)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.9-8.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.9-5.fc13,nss-util-3.12.9-1.fc13,nspr-4.8.7-1.fc13
The corresponding ones for f14 are already on stable.
Thanks in advance,
Elio
smime.p7s
Desc
commit c720b14c8c8f9a2a8de3a88d0c8e579a76c295c4
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Thu Mar 3 13:26:27 2011 -0500
8.50
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 12
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
d
commit 8fdaadf02dc3f2c4d3db94455eefad009cd38d5a
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Thu Mar 3 13:23:52 2011 -0500
8.50
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 12
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Image-ExifTool.spec
commit 789d6e89a14fda88d5f28b1d51ca2fa0f144cc7d
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Thu Mar 3 13:23:21 2011 -0500
8.50
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 13 ++---
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Image-ExifTool.sp
commit 590003b03fc738b7fe13563fd7999594c3273e42
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Thu Mar 3 13:22:33 2011 -0500
8.50
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 13 ++---
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Image-ExifTool.sp
commit 1f51e2ee90201b8c3546b05b0c38ac43c1668b2e
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Thu Mar 3 13:21:59 2011 -0500
8.50
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 13 ++---
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Image-ExifTool.sp
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:39:26PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:27:45AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
> > in decimal? really?), it looks like the pci id for the device in
> > question is 10EC:8172. U
commit 90feb6aa6042322944a7b777069b2916e3d3ebb5
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Thu Mar 3 13:17:13 2011 -0500
8.50
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec | 13 ++---
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Image-ExifTool.sp
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:27 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
> in decimal? really?)
Yes, really. You're not the first to notice this is a huge pile of crack
=)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora T
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Image-ExifTool:
58b56828b56b5be92c857ec89ae93925 Image-ExifTool-8.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 03/03/2011 10:18 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 11:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
>> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681940
>
>
> as well
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8 Release Candidate 1. This release has fixes for bugs
found in 1.2.8 alpha testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install --enablere
On 03/02/2011 11:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681940
as well I submitted to bash upstream with bashbug which submits to a
ma
On 03/03/2011 07:27 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
> in decimal? really?), ...
Yes, using decimal for PCI vendor:product impedes usability.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494142
which was entered two years ago and re-
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:27:45AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
> in decimal? really?), it looks like the pci id for the device in
> question is 10EC:8172. Unfortunately, none of the current rtlwifi
> sub-drivers claim that
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> The above link gives 404 error, I guess the correct link is:
> http://help.transifex.net/user-guide/client/index.html
Thanks! The subject should have mentioned "changes" instead of
"hanges" as well...
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leade
On 03/03/2011 04:46 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> Quick Summary
> ---
> The Fedora translation workflow has changed. If you are a developer
> of a package being translated by the Fedora Translation (L10n)
> Project, you must change your workflow slightly if you want translated
> strings to appear in
Summary of changes:
bed6eba... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
ebe0237... update to 0.03 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Summary of changes:
bed6eba... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
ebe0237... update to 0.03 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Summary of changes:
ebe0237... update to 0.03 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit ebe02371539972e7ac01b9ddb6949385c5097c39
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Mar 3 16:55:06 2011 +0100
update to 0.03
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Eval-Closure.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Hi,
I am facing a weird issue with koji and rawhide/f16:
When trying to build perl-Plack in koji, the f16 built fails:
f16: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2881639
with a seemingly networking related error from its testsuite:
...
t/Plack-Handler/apache2-registry.t ...
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Eval-Closure:
2e2a7319882b01fda25c57f4b3373968 Eval-Closure-0.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Quick Summary
---
The Fedora translation workflow has changed. If you are a developer
of a package being translated by the Fedora Translation (L10n)
Project, you must change your workflow slightly if you want translated
strings to appear in your software package. Tools and assistance are
available
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.39-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
099a308... Update to 1.39
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.39-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
099a308... Update to 1.39
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
Summary of changes:
099a308... Update to 1.39 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit 099a308b911b4051991689140d262da121830af2
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu Mar 3 15:27:17 2011 +
Update to 1.39
- New upstream release 1.39:
- fixed documentation of http verification: wildcards in cn is allowed
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-IO-Socket-SSL.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:53:23PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:35:12AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> > Looks like it, based on the addition of the rtl8192ce driver upstream
> > in 2.6.38, which includes support for multiple 8191 devices as well.
> >
> > Knowing your PCI de
Hi,
I am facing a weird issue with koji and rawhide/f16:
When trying to build perl-Plack in koji, the f16 built fails:
f16: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2881639
with a seemingly networking related error from its testsuite:
...
t/Plack-Handler/apache2-registry.t ...
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
776f36451970287c9b3c77e1d39dd7ed IO-Socket-SSL-1.39.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 03/02/2011 10:30 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 02/03/11 11:23, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:51:50PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> 2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use
>>> BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the defa
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:35:12AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Looks like it, based on the addition of the rtl8192ce driver upstream
> in 2.6.38, which includes support for multiple 8191 devices as well.
>
> Knowing your PCI device ID would lead to more certainty. Devices the
> driver claims to
On Mar 3, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will F15 (and maybe also newer F14 kernels?) support the RTL8191SEvB
> Wireless LAN Controller? AFAIK at least stock F14 does not support it.
Looks like it, based on the addition of the rtl8192ce driver upstream
in 2.6.38, which includes supp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #21 from Matej Cepl 2011-03-03 08:52:13 EST ---
[root@luther dspam]# dspam --version
[...]
'--with-dspam-group=mail'
commit f8b26cf1e4f426438f9ab6a69cbccd48843d9505
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Mar 3 14:02:04 2011 +0100
Upstream update.
Reflect upstream not shipping Plack/Handler/Net/FastCGI.pm anymore.
Spec file cleanup.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Plack.spec | 19 +--
Hi,
Will F15 (and maybe also newer F14 kernels?) support the RTL8191SEvB
Wireless LAN Controller? AFAIK at least stock F14 does not support it.
Thx,
--
--Jos Vos
--X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
--Amsterdam, The Netherlands| Fax: +31 20 6948
I'm curious about the accounting method. I see there are some Nouveau
bugs listed CLOSED DUPLICATE. I raised one as a result of the test
day, 679404, it was later marked duplicate of 679924 (which is in the
list).
Just wondering what it means when some bugs are listed and some aren't.
-Cam
On Th
43 matches
Mail list logo
