On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 14:51:50 -0500,
Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> 3) All the various little tools that we have for putting together
> LiveCD's that are very ext* centered. I've not even looked at this
> yet, but I assume it's going to be kind of a pain.
I like to see live CDs just use squashfs d
I just got an ABRT bug for a Fedora 12 package [1]. Can we prevent bugs
being filed for EOL products? Who needs to handle this? Is this a
known issue?
Thanks!
- Orion
[1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679584
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> 2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use
> BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default.
In my personal opinion, this is a poor design decision. Yes, BTRFS can
do a lot of volume-y things, and th
2011/2/22 Jóhann B. :
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> So what are your thoughts? Thanks,
>
> Will there be any performance penalties making this move?
>
Who knows, thats what testing is for :). There are some things that
suck with BTRFS, but so it goes with filesystems
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 22.02.11 14:51, Josef Bacik (jo...@toxicpanda.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
>> take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
>> Coming up in
On Tue, 22.02.11 12:19, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2011/2/22 Michał Piotrowski :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
> > hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg
Here's the list of packages, with reasons:
- gnome-launch-box, replaced by gnome-shell's builtin features (mostly,
filed bugs for the rest)
- libgalago, libgalago-gtk, replaced within GNOME with session-wide
features, but could still be used by supported applications.
First come, first serve.
Ch
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 22:38 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With some effort, and help from the guys on #anaconda@freenode (thanks!),
> today I finally installed a bare-metal F15 system (part of the complication
> was my existing partitions).
>
> Then I updated it to rawhide. However, the w
2011/2/22 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
> hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
>
> Currently I have quite a lot of work, but I make a
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> So what are your thoughts? Thanks,
Will there be any performance penalties making this move?
I ran it on my workstation when F13 came out with updates+snapshots and while
updating my desktop responsiveness was well not so good.
Novice en
Josef Bacik writes:
2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use
BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default.
Just to clarify -- F16 will still have LVM, but not used by default.
I believe that there's a huge number of existing systems that are
part
[...btrfs and read-only root,/etc...]
Music to my ears.
Glad you're working on this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:38:24 +0100
Jim Meyering wrote:
> With some effort, and help from the guys on #anaconda@freenode
> (thanks!), today I finally installed a bare-metal F15 system (part of
> the complication was my existing partitions).
>
> Then I updated it to rawhide. However, the whole poi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.64-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by
signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679589
Summary: [abrt] perl-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679589
--- Comment #1 from Simon Lachance 2011-02-22 17:20:27 EST
---
Created attachment 480282
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/atta
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:40 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
> hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
I'm planning on review
On Tue, 22.02.11 14:51, Josef Bacik (jo...@toxicpanda.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
> take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
> Coming up in F15 we're going to have the first release of Fedora where
> we don'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679313
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hi,
With some effort, and help from the guys on #anaconda@freenode (thanks!),
today I finally installed a bare-metal F15 system (part of the complication
was my existing partitions).
Then I updated it to rawhide. However, the whole point of this was to
be able to compile and test some things, ye
On 02/22/2011 02:51 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
> take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
> Coming up in F15 we're going to have the first release of Fedora where
...
>
> So what are your thou
> > 1) GRUB support. Edward Shishkin did GRUB1 patches for BTRFS a while
> > ago, but they were obviously never merged upstream and were also not
> > included into fedora. These would either need to be cleaned up and
> > put into our grub package, or we'd need to put /boot on a different
> > file
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:51:50 -0500
> Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
>> take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
> ...snip...
>
>> 1) GRUB suppor
> 1) Fedora 16 ships with BTRFS as the default root filesystem.
> 2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use
> BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default.
>
> 2) Anaconda support. I've already talked with Will Woods about this
> some. Really anaconda
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:55:26 +0100
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
...snip...
> >
> > #544 List of services that may start by default
> > .fesco 544
>
> Please post a log after the meeting
I always do. ;)
Note that I wasn't sure if we are even going to discuss that this week,
as it's still s
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:51:50 -0500
Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
> take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
...snip...
> 1) GRUB support. Edward Shishkin did GRUB1 patches for BTRFS a while
> ago, bu
Hi,
2011/2/22 Kevin Fenzi :
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> Links to all tickets below can be found at:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
>
> = Followups =
>
> #
Hello,
So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
Coming up in F15 we're going to have the first release of Fedora where
we don't need the special boot option to have the ability to format
you filesystem as
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #516 Updates policy adjustments/change
Hi,
I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
Currently I have quite a lot of work, but I make a systemd services
pledge - I'll write three
On Tue, 22.02.11 12:55, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > the same time. That should give you a minimal idea on what is going
> > on. However no progress bar. In the syslog output the progress bar would
> > not ma
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 08/2011
Time: 2011-02-22 15:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.o
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> the same time. That should give you a minimal idea on what is going
> on. However no progress bar. In the syslog output the progress bar would
> not make much sense probably. fsck (at least in the ext234
> implementation) support
On 02/22/2011 10:45 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:57:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On a more abstract level one may consider perl's META.yml-machinery to
>> be a package dependency tracking machinery of its own, in parallel to
>> rpm's dependency tracking machinery, with
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Fedora 15 Alpha RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
> pages for download links and testing instructions.
>
> Installation:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
>
> Desktop:
>
> https:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:05:07PM +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Most of the people in the maintainers list are members of the desktop
> team at Red Hat, the group which owned the package when it was migrated
> from Fedora Core to Fedora. I doubt any of them are interested in
> maintaining it.
I'
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Lun 21 février 2011 22:27, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
>> Thanks for the answer. I also thought that it is reasonable, but wanted
>> to make sure before calling others for it. I just wonder if it is
>> possible to have group dependencies in comps.xml or by packages! Wha
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 13:52 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> On 22.02.2011 05:00, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 00:57 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> >> Is David still around?
> >
> > Yes, and hacking on GNOME 3.
>
> And no five minutes to care about older duties or at least reply?
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 13:40 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Or maybe the whole problem set goes away by doing nothing since btrfs
> has no fsck? ;-)
>
When I spoke with Josef a couple of weeks ago he said btrfs would be
getting a fsck very soon.
borne out by this comment from Chris:
http://w
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 09:29 -0300, Domingo Becker wrote:
> 2011/2/19 Dominic Hopf :
> >>
> >> I think that a just installed Fedora box should have the ability to
> >> install software from an usb stick without the need of an internet
> >> connection.
> >>
> >> Think about a computer with F14 for ma
Dne 22.2.2011 09:47, Michal Nowak napsal(a):
> - Original Message -
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm new in rpm building and want to prepare a package for webapp
>> Habari
>> (review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673630)
>> but.. I
>> have a problem with locale files, which are
On 22.02.2011 05:00, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 00:57 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote:
>> Is David still around?
>
> Yes, and hacking on GNOME 3.
And no five minutes to care about older duties or at least reply? Too bad.
>> resolve the issues surrounding Festival?
>
> I've asked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Coro-5.371 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679380
Summary: perl-Coro-5.371 is available
Product: Fedora
Vers
On Mon, 21.02.11 22:45, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:54:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > Updated to this morning's rawhide. Rebooted. Now, I get to mounting my
> > > filesystems, which works succesfully, and then it just sits there.
> > I nee
2011/2/19 Dominic Hopf :
>>
>> I think that a just installed Fedora box should have the ability to
>> install software from an usb stick without the need of an internet
>> connection.
>>
>> Think about a computer with F14 for managing something in a place
>> without internet connection (I have seve
commit 157efecf23344ac0b6c3c47b8bef47a90392e208
Author: Yanko Kaneti
Date: Tue Feb 22 12:55:14 2011 +0200
Update to latest upstream 1.11
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec | 10 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
ac3ba29a1f4d0d2f837668dd3bbb83ec Mojolicious-1.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:57:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On a more abstract level one may consider perl's META.yml-machinery to
> be a package dependency tracking machinery of its own, in parallel to
> rpm's dependency tracking machinery, with the essentially the same
> issues, problems and i
Le Lun 21 février 2011 22:27, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
>
>
>
> On ۱۱/۰۲/۲۲ 12:30, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le lundi 21 février 2011 à 21:42 +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
>>
>>> Now, as is being discussed in [1], which fonts should be pulled by a
>>> desktop environment as its dependenci
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679313
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-22
04:21:16 EST ---
perl-SDL-2.2.6-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679313
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Summary of changes:
b0a8882... - Rebase to 2.2.6 upstream release (#679313) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
commit b0a8882f1eb8a47fc631c5b0d44c23e05d4d31f7
Author: Hans de Goede
Date: Tue Feb 22 09:58:58 2011 +0100
- Rebase to 2.2.6 upstream release (#679313)
.gitignore |1 +
filter-provides.sh |2 +-
perl-SDL-gfxPie.patch | 34 -
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SDL:
445950ca7b9991f34ec792bbac8386b6 SDL_Perl-v2.2.6.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
- Original Message -
> Hi list,
>
> I'm new in rpm building and want to prepare a package for webapp
> Habari
> (review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673630)
> but.. I
> have a problem with locale files, which are situated in
> %{_datadir}/habari/system/locale. When
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-SDL is out of date 2.1.3-13 (~2007)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679313
Summary: perl-SDL is out of date 2.1.3-13 (~2007)
Product
55 matches
Mail list logo
