Hi,
i took ice since it is business critical, co-maintainers are *very* welcome.
best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
Thanks and congrats!
> list of all things not built yet at
> http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html
> there is ~400 packages that rpm-4.9.0 failed to parse the spec files.
Are there any more details about the errors?
Jens
--
devel
> ... so, given that I've used "fedpkg co -B" to create a working tree
> with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/
> subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's a better answer than
> "rm -rf and re-clone".
This is what I am doing:
for i in *; do
if [ -d $i -a -d
Dennis Gilmore writes:
> We have also mass branched everything.
... so, given that I've used "fedpkg co -B" to create a working tree
with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/
subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's a better answer than
"rm -rf and re-clone".
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:34:02 -0700
Kurt Seifried wrote:
> Hey just pinging you, do I need to do anything to get added to the
> packages still?
Hum. You are not currently a packager?
(or if so, I can't find your account in that group).
If you aren't, we will need to get you sponsored before yo
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:28 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0.
> We could think about updating the gtk3 package in F14 to 3.0.0 if that
> is useful for people. We had essentially abandoned this and a few other
> packages in F14 a
The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the
list of all things not built yet at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html
there is ~400 packages that rpm-4.9.0 failed to parse the spec files.
the couple i
I will be working on archiving fedora release 12 from
/pub/fedora/linux to /pub/archive/fedora/linux. The data should be
mostly across already, but I want to let people know that the changes
are occuring and that we will be making changes to Mirror manager
point from one to the other.
--
Stephen
Hey just pinging you, do I need to do anything to get added to the
packages still?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>> I'll approve it as a fesco member. ;) Just ping me in 3 days and we can
>> add you to the package.
>
> Sorry got caught up with some other stuff, pinging you
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to allow porting applications to GTK+ 3 and testing them with a current GTK+
> 3 on Fedora 14 (the stock 2.90.5 is quite old, from before the theming
> changes, among other things), I have prepared packages of the latest gtk3
> (2
Karl Vogel has an interesting discussion relevant to the bugzilla growth
and management issues from the 'abrt' debate. The blog is titled "Bug
Growth is Proportional to User Growth, and Bugs are not Technical Debt":
http://www.rants.org/2010/01/10/bugs-users-and-tech-debt/
He makes a point that
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el5' was created pointing to:
8827c41... Initial EPEL 4/5 release, based on F-14 version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el4' was created pointing to:
8827c41... Initial EPEL 4/5 release, based on F-14 version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
# F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-02-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1]
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora
15. We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the
Alpha r
Hi,
to allow porting applications to GTK+ 3 and testing them with a current GTK+
3 on Fedora 14 (the stock 2.90.5 is quite old, from before the theming
changes, among other things), I have prepared packages of the latest gtk3
(2.99.3) for Fedora 14:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/kkofler/g
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >>> Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
>> On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>>> Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of
>>> LDAP-base
On 02/08/2011 02:22 AM, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> hi guys, i made some changes to md raid1 software, could fedora test
> it? for me it work very nice =)
> the raid1 new code is based in kernel 2.6.37
> here is the new and old code:
> www.spadim.com.br/raid1
>
> just read_balance changed (4 modes: ne
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 18:31:21, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Is ldapsearch on your rawhide machine working?
>
> It is. What's not working is logging in as a user other than root. I
> can't even su to a user other than root.
>
> I am using Kerberos for user authentication; however, "kinit
Hi Hans.
I'll get this one done for you, can you do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926
Peter
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in
> return:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
Hi,
I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in return:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671883
Bug 671883 - Review Request: v4l-utils - Utilities for video4linux and DVB
devices
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > The problem is it would require making screen setuid root which I do not
> > think it is too good idea.
>
> Well, I think the fear of making something SUID root is not reason
> enough not to make things technically correct.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan TeXmacs
Grabbed.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá,
kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl.
23 matches
Mail list logo
