Re: incompatible screen update

2011-02-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi, > > just a heads up, the screen package in rawhide was updated to a pre > 4.1.0 git snapshot and after the update you won't be able to reattach > to your old screen session. > > There are actually three incompatible chan

libedit update

2011-02-07 Thread Jerry James
I need a libedit update to attempt to resolve bug #511303. In particular, the latest version includes wide character (Unicode) support. I've just done the rebuild. This should not effect other programs that use libedit, but just in case, check your programs for any weirdness. If I've broken som

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan bigloo >comaintained by: salimma > > Orphan ffcall >comaintained by: salimma > I need these two to work, so I can either maintain or comaintain if the existing comaintainer would like me to. -- Jerry James http://

new raid1 read balance working, please test it! kernel 2.6.37 based

2011-02-07 Thread Roberto Spadim
hi guys, i made some changes to md raid1 software, could fedora test it? for me it work very nice =) the raid1 new code is based in kernel 2.6.37 here is the new and old code: www.spadim.com.br/raid1 just read_balance changed (4 modes: near_head(today) round_robin(counter per mirror) stripe (like

[389-devel] Please Review: (668950) Add posixGroup support to Console

2011-02-07 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668950 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477527&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477528&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477529&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477

Check your KDE application's license

2011-02-07 Thread Julian Aloofi
Hi everybody, if you're maintaining a KDE application in Fedora, there might be a chance that it is using a modified GPL license header (see this thread on the legal list http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-February/001537.html ). I only know of this being the case with Yakuake and

Re: perl @INC (paths) again

2011-02-07 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/07/2011 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] : >> >> I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to >> achieve much in practice. > > I have to admit this is my conclusion as well. > >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> >

Re: Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package. . .

2011-02-07 Thread B.
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 16:01 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:23:11 + > Jóhann "B." Guðmundsson wrote: > > > I've been experiencing some mutter crashes when trying to report it > > via abrt, abrt informed me that reporting was disabled because the > > backtrace is unusable an

Re: Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package. . .

2011-02-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:23:11 + Jóhann "B." Guðmundsson wrote: > I've been experiencing some mutter crashes when trying to report it > via abrt, abrt informed me that reporting was disabled because the > backtrace is unusable and suggested I installed debuginfo-install > mutter then refresh an

Re: perl @INC (paths) again

2011-02-07 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] : > > I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to > achieve much in practice. I have to admit this is my conclusion as well. > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > So overall I'm in favour of using the F-15 set of paths

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan ocaml-lablgl > comaintained by: rjones > Orphan: gtkglarea2 I took these two. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. C

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

2011-02-07 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora 14 is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

[pkgdb] ocaml-lablgl ownership changed

2011-02-07 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package ocaml-lablgl in Fedora devel is now owned by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-lablgl ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package. . .

2011-02-07 Thread B.
I've been experiencing some mutter crashes when trying to report it via abrt, abrt informed me that reporting was disabled because the backtrace is unusable and suggested I installed debuginfo-install mutter then refresh and try again which revealed. .. Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Dominic Hopf
Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 15:59 -0500 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orpha

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. As > you can see, t

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
Le lundi 07 février 2011 à 15:59 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orp

[ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Bill Nottingham
Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. As you can see, there are a lot of dependencies on

Re: changes to base-x comps group

2011-02-07 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: > (Attempting to CC relevant spins/groups maintainers) > > I'm looking to do some rework of the base-x comps group. Right now, its > main purpose in life is to provide the X server that is used by the > various desktops (and the window-managers group, I

Re: [rhythmbox] Don't forget the changelog

2011-02-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:27:12 + (UTC), Cosimo wrote: > %changelog > +* Mon Feb 7 2011 Cosimo Cecchi cosimoc redhat com - 2.91.0-1.git20110207 > +- Update to a 2.91.0 git snapshot > +- Disable DAAP sharing plugin, as it requires a newer libdmapsharing > +- Depend on gtk3 > + A newer libdmap

[389-devel] Please Review: (583652) Console caches magic numbers instead of DNA-generated values

2011-02-07 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583652 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477488&action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: [Bug 675265] preventryusn gets added to entries on a failed delete

2011-02-07 Thread Noriko Hosoi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675265 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477486&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477486&action=edit Description: When an entry is deleted with Entry USN plugin enabled, an operational attribute preventryusn is added

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-07 Thread Zach Carter
On Friday, February 04, 2011 05:33:24 am Petr Machata wrote: > Hi, > > beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's > now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation > for final release that should be out on 7th, just before the feature > freeze

rails 3 is in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Mohammed Morsi
I am pleased to announce that the last packages required for Rails 3 support in Fedora have been pushed to rawhide and successfully built in anticipation of the Fedora 15 release. Rails 3.0.3 is a major upgrade from 2.3.8 which brings some API incompatibilities as a trade off for many new fea

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread Adam Jackson
David Boles wrote: > For some reason Fedora has serious problems with my old CRT monitor > is connected to my test machine. Fedora see 'nothing' while another > distro that shall be nameless sees 1600x00 but not the maker. Since > Fedora removed system-config-display I can no longer get a good 2D

Re: Preferred & Startup applications gone?

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications > > should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the > > desktop providing a central config point. > > To the GNOME develo

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora GNOME 3 Test Day #1 coming up tomorrow

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:09:41 +0100, Christoph wrote: > > > > * At the graphical login screen, I cannot log in. I did the useradd > > > manually, and it appears as an empty entry to click on. Authentication > > > fails. Cursor doesn't show

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 18:01 +, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having two problems on two different boxes, both running rawhide. > > Problem 1 (my main box) - whoever decided to remove the default > applications thing from the menu, please put it back. I can understand > the rational, bu

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 02/07/2011 12:29 PM, David wrote: > "steam powered technology". This is pretty much what I was talking about > here. My 'real' machine, the one that I use for work, is modern within > 12 months. My 'made from taken out parts' machine is not. As I said I > can deal with that. > > But there are ot

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread David
On 2/7/2011 4:07 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 02/07/2011 01:18 AM, David wrote: >> On 2/6/2011 5:41 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote: >>> On 02/06/2011 01:38 PM, David wrote: >>> >>> >>> Well... this is one of the things we want to get out of the GNOME 3 >>> test days. If you aren't gettin

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread David
On 2/6/2011 11:34 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 23:12:06 -0500, > David wrote: >> 5800 GTX card to work properly. The Linux drivers do not work as they >> should. For me. And something about the version of Xorg and this, or a >> combination of theses, makes major problems

Re: Unavailable Maintainer: Peter Gordon

2011-02-07 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
Le samedi 05 février 2011 à 16:31 -0700, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > Greetings. > > It seems that Peter has been unavailable for Fedora packaging work for > a while now. I have been maintaining two of his packages, (midori and > webkitgtk) but there are a number of others which may need attention.

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 02/07/2011 01:18 AM, David wrote: > On 2/6/2011 5:41 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote: >> On 02/06/2011 01:38 PM, David wrote: >> >> >> Well... this is one of the things we want to get out of the GNOME 3 >> test days. If you aren't getting either a shell or fallback mode, we >> need to know what h