Rawhide Report wrote:
> gnome-chemistry-utils-0.12.6-2.fc15
> ---
> * Sat Feb 05 2011 Julian Sikorski - 0.12.6-2
> - Rebuilt for goffice-0.8.13 and gnumeric-1.10.13
> - Added -fpermissive to CXXFLAGS to fix building with gcc-4.6
Can't we fix this to build without t
On 2/6/2011 11:34 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 23:12:06 -0500,
> David wrote:
>> 5800 GTX card to work properly. The Linux drivers do not work as they
>> should. For me. And something about the version of Xorg and this, or a
>> combination of theses, makes major problems
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 23:12:06 -0500,
David wrote:
> 5800 GTX card to work properly. The Linux drivers do not work as they
> should. For me. And something about the version of Xorg and this, or a
> combination of theses, makes major problems for me. Broke my desktop and
> the general Gnome 'ex
...snip...
I would just like to note that this is pre ALPHA rawhide. There are
periods where rawhide is unstable when many new things are landing and
we are in one of them right now.
To try and extrapolate what would happen if F15 was released with the
current issues you have noted is foolish, s
On 2/6/2011 10:45 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 20:18:40 -0500,
> David wrote:
>>
>> My concern is for those that can not deal with this 'forced' change.
>> Your product is free. one can not sell a product that is broken. But you
>> also can not give a way something that p
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 20:18:40 -0500,
David wrote:
>
> My concern is for those that can not deal with this 'forced' change.
> Your product is free. one can not sell a product that is broken. But you
> also can not give a way something that people can not use.
The plan has always been that yo
On 2/6/2011 5:41 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 02/06/2011 01:38 PM, David wrote:
>
>
> Well... this is one of the things we want to get out of the GNOME 3
> test days. If you aren't getting either a shell or fallback mode, we
> need to know what hardware you're using so we can make sure it
On 02/04/2011 03:38 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> 04.02.2011 21:10, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
>> changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream?
>
> What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc or binuti
On 02/06/2011 01:38 PM, David wrote:
> On 2/6/2011 3:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 18:01:58 +,
>>"Paul F. Johnson" wrote:
>>>
>>> Any help on fixing these issues, please let me know - they're both
>>> driving me mad!!
>>
>> metacity and gnome-panel seem to be
On 2/6/2011 3:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 18:01:58 +,
> "Paul F. Johnson" wrote:
>>
>> Any help on fixing these issues, please let me know - they're both
>> driving me mad!!
>
> metacity and gnome-panel seem to be getting started as a fallnack when
> gnome-sh
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 16:36 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> [mbooth@mc ~]$ repoquery --alldeps --tree-whatrequires pmd
Just FYI, the --alldeps is not needed here as the current implementation
of --tree-* is recursive anyway.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 18:01:58 +,
"Paul F. Johnson" wrote:
>
> Any help on fixing these issues, please let me know - they're both
> driving me mad!!
metacity and gnome-panel seem to be getting started as a fallnack when
gnome-shell isn't installed now. So refreshing from an up to dat
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for gcc-4.6, xz compression changes, and to a lesser extent we will be doing a
> mass rebuild starting monday. it will be done in a side tag with a lower than
> normal priority so that you can still submit builds and not have to w
On 02/04/2011 10:00 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for gcc-4.6, xz compression changes, and to a lesser extent we will be doing a
> mass rebuild starting monday. it will be done in a side tag with a lower than
> normal priority so that you can still submit builds and not have to wait for
>
06.02.2011 15:44, Thomas Spura wrote:
> I just rebuild my package and tried a random other one: xsd and it
> failed:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2764873
From the looks of it, this is the case of boost::filesystem v2 vs. v3.
This will get rid of it:
diff --git a/xsd.sp
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:05:57 +0100
Petr Machata wrote:
> 04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote:
> > I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
> > sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a
> > non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today.
[
All the OCaml messages should be cleared up in tomorrow's report
[http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-February/148398.html]
except for ocaml-camlimages which has been through the EOL procedure
and I'm waiting for rel-eng to drop the package
[https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:15:23AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/06/2011 09:54 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 02/05/2011 05:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 01:28:03PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> >>> frama-c-1.5-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(GEdit) = 0:19
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:54:24AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/05/2011 05:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 01:28:03PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> >>frama-c-1.5-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(GEdit) = 0:19e02eb8d58960097f5
> >[etc]
> >
> >>ocaml-lablgtk-2.14
On 02/06/2011 09:54 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/05/2011 05:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 01:28:03PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>>> frama-c-1.5-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(GEdit) = 0:19e02eb8d58960097f5
>> [etc]
>>
>>> ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.2-2.fc15
>>> -
20 matches
Mail list logo
