Re: rawhide report: 20110205 changes

2011-02-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 02/05/2011 05:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 01:28:03PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: >> frama-c-1.5-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(GEdit) = 0:19e02eb8d58960097f5 > [etc] > >> ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.2-2.fc15 >> --- >> * Fri Feb 04 2011 Richard W.

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2011-02-05 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 10:52:48AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On 02/04/2011 07:18 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > > A new section has been added to the Packaging Guidelines concerning the > > proper packaging of tmpfiles.d configurations and directories: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pac

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > There's going to be a mass rebuild shortly, so those packages should all > be rebuilt soon. But the way our mass rebuilds are done does not work for dependency chains where all involved packages have to be rebuilt in reverse dependency order to fix the broken dependency

Unavailable Maintainer: Peter Gordon

2011-02-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. It seems that Peter has been unavailable for Fedora packaging work for a while now. I have been maintaining two of his packages, (midori and webkitgtk) but there are a number of others which may need attention. In particular: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654807 Show

Orphanings/dead packaging libnc-dap; octave releases and octave-forge future

2011-02-05 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm planning on dropping libnc-dap. It is no longer supported and functionality has moved into the netcdf 4 library. The only package currently requiring libnc-dap is: octave-forge-0:20090607-17.fc14.i686 Also, apparently octave is planning a 3.4 release this weekend which I would like to see

Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-05 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, I'm having two problems on two different boxes, both running rawhide. Problem 1 (my main box) - whoever decided to remove the default applications thing from the menu, please put it back. I can understand the rational, but it currently means that on firing up my desktop, I don't have nautilus

Re: Orphaning pmd

2011-02-05 Thread Mat Booth
On 5 February 2011 16:23, Mat Booth wrote: > On 5 February 2011 03:23, Jerry James wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Jerry James wrote: >>> I haven't used pmd for almost 2 years now.  I think it is time to have >>> somebody who does use it take over maintainership.  There are no open >>

Re: Orphaning pmd

2011-02-05 Thread Mat Booth
On 5 February 2011 03:23, Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Jerry James wrote: >> I haven't used pmd for almost 2 years now.  I think it is time to have >> somebody who does use it take over maintainership.  There are no open >> bugs at this time. > > I'm afraid I have to forc

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:05:57 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: > > The packages that I tried built OK, so I'm calling this good enough, and > spinning an official build now. The list of ABI dependences is here. > These packages really really need to be rebuilt, otherwise they'll stop > working

Re: rawhide report: 20110205 changes

2011-02-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 01:28:03PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: > frama-c-1.5-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(GEdit) = 0:19e02eb8d58960097f5 [etc] > ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.2-2.fc15 > --- > * Fri Feb 04 2011 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.14.2-2 > - Rebuild for libpanel-applet sonam

busybox outdated

2011-02-05 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
hi, can anyone take care of busybox ? 1.15.1 release is rather old(1.5y), and the newer versions bring more features and fixes. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650442 -thanks- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-05 Thread Petr Machata
04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote: > I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make > sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a > non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today. The packages that I tried built OK, so I'm calling this good eno

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2011-02-05 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 02/04/2011 07:18 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > A new section has been added to the Packaging Guidelines concerning the > proper packaging of tmpfiles.d configurations and directories: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tmpfiles.d That page notes that tmpfiles.d is not supported in EL-