Re: Preferred & Startup applications gone?

2011-02-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications > should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the > desktop providing a central config point. To the GNOME developers (Adam, I know you are just the messenger): This is very broke

Re: rawhide woes

2011-02-03 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 18:04 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > I tried to net (minimal) install 40 hours ago and got no initrd and thus no > boot. Culprit was less not installed. I made a working initrd via chroot and > yum install less. Still when done, ethX cannot be found, so I have no network > ex

Preferred & Startup applications gone?

2011-02-03 Thread Andre Robatino
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes: > it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications > should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the > desktop providing a central config point. Is there a replacement for "Automatically remember running applications

Re: Preferred & Startup applications gone?

2011-02-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 00:05 +, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > Using the current spin on rawhide but seem to have lost where I set the > startup applications and preferred apps up from. The used to be under > Preferences but seem to have vanished. > > Any idea what I need to re-install to ge

Preferred & Startup applications gone?

2011-02-03 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, Using the current spin on rawhide but seem to have lost where I set the startup applications and preferred apps up from. The used to be under Preferences but seem to have vanished. Any idea what I need to re-install to get it back. There is nothing under System Settings which lets me do this.

Problem building mono-2.10 under rawhide

2011-02-03 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, I'm currently packaging Mono-2.10 RC2 for rawhide but have hit a snag and I'm not sure if it's Fedora or mono, so I'm seeking advice. The error I'm getting is make[8]: Entering directory `/home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILD/mono-2.10/mcs/tools/gacutil' MCS [basic] gacutil.exe Inconsistency detecte

Re: Some thoughts on Audacious in Fedora

2011-02-03 Thread Chris Jones
So it seems that Audacious is not as flexible between its own different version releases? What is with that? Surely that much can't change between releases to make the plug-ins fail between versions? -- Chris Jones PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web C and L Jones - Proprietors ABN: 98

Re: rawhide woes

2011-02-03 Thread Felix Miata
On 2011/02/03 23:08 (GMT+0100) Christoph Frieben composed: > John Reiser wrote: >> Thinking it might be easier to install a new system, I first tried the >> latest nightly, desktop-x86_64-20110130.16.iso, .. > Recent install media can be found at: > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/

Re: rawhide woes

2011-02-03 Thread Christoph Frieben
2011/2/3 John Reiser: > Thinking it might be easier to install a new system, I first tried the latest > nightly, desktop-x86_64-20110130.16.iso, .. Recent install media can be found at: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Alpha.TC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/ in particular a working netinst.is

[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000004-2.fc15

2011-02-03 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.04-2.fc15' was created pointing to: 31fe10b... Initial import of perl-Module-Metadata-1.04-2 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.f

Re: rawhide woes

2011-02-03 Thread John Reiser
> Thinking it might be easier to install a new system, I first > tried the latest nightly, desktop-x86_64-20110130.16.iso, > but that has its own problem: > > "Install to harddrive" fails with "not a live image" > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/672265 I was able to compose a DVD of today's rawhid

Re: rawhide woes

2011-02-03 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:21:56PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > [0.737139] Kernel panic - not syncing: UFS: Unable to mount root fs on > unXno > wn-block(0,0) > [0.737820] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted > 2.6.38-0.rc3.git0.1.fc15.x86_64 > #1 > [0.738435] CaII Trace: > [0.738714

rawhide woes

2011-02-03 Thread Jim Meyering
TL;DR if you have a working rawhide system, you may want to refrain from updating it for a little while. I have been maintaining a headless rawhide system for more than two years, updating every 1-4 days. There have been a few hassles, but nothing terrible. Today however, after an update and a y

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora GNOME 3 Test Day #1 coming up tomorrow

2011-02-03 Thread John Reiser
On 02/03/2011 12:44 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote: >> Well, my Rawhide is still stuck with XFCE, because GNOME doesn't work. >> Creating a fresh user account and logging in starts lots of GNOME related >> processes, but ends with an empty screen with blue background and a >> movable mouse pointer. An

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora GNOME 3 Test Day #1 coming up tomorrow

2011-02-03 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, > Well, my Rawhide is still stuck with XFCE, because GNOME doesn't work. > Creating a fresh user account and logging in starts lots of GNOME related > processes, but ends with an empty screen with blue background and a > movable mouse pointer. Any ideas on that? Unfourtuanty I don't have a so

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote: > I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed > that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it > manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is > the

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora GNOME 3 Test Day #1 coming up tomorrow

2011-02-03 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:58:27 -0800, Adam wrote: > QA and Desktop teams are running three Test Days to test out GNOME 3 > ahead of F15 (and GNOME 3.0) releases, and the first is tomorrow! > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-03_GNOME3_Alpha > > Please come along and help test - the

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-03 Thread Braden McDaniel
On 2/1/11 6:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 02/01/2011 05:05 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: >> On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote: >>> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting >>> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine). >>> >>> I would assume its th

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-03 Thread Braden McDaniel
On 2/3/11 1:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: >> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed >> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it >> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configu

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-03 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: > I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed > that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it > manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is > there something

Re: [389-devel] is it correct: slapi_dn_normalize_ext removes space after escaped comma

2011-02-03 Thread Nathan Kinder
On 02/03/2011 08:19 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote: > On 02/03/2011 12:08 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: >> I have built the DS on Solaris 10 and I have updated the source to 1.2.7.5 >> (git). >> Can You give me the bugid, so that I can compare the source code related to >> this issue? > It was bug 641944.

Re: [389-devel] is it correct: slapi_dn_normalize_ext removes space after escaped comma

2011-02-03 Thread Nathan Kinder
On 02/03/2011 12:08 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: > I have built the DS on Solaris 10 and I have updated the source to 1.2.7.5 > (git). > Can You give me the bugid, so that I can compare the source code related to > this issue? It was bug 641944. It was fixed after 1.2.7.5 was released. > Thanks, >

Re: __perl_requires misbehaving in rawhide (rpm or grep broken??)

2011-02-03 Thread Paul Howarth
On 03/02/11 15:46, Tom Lane wrote: > Paul Howarth writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail >>> about >>> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc.pl) > >> RPM 4.9 has made changes in the provides/requires extraction code tha

Re: __perl_requires misbehaving in rawhide (rpm or grep broken??)

2011-02-03 Thread Tom Lane
Paul Howarth writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail >> about >> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc.pl) > RPM 4.9 has made changes in the provides/requires extraction code that > are not entirely backwards-compatible.

Re: PHP packaging question: pear or not pear ?

2011-02-03 Thread Patrick MONNERAT
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 19:20 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 02/02/2011 14:09, Patrick MONNERAT a écrit : > > > > There is a project I would like to package: this is > > http://php-yubico.googlecode.com/. This project is using PEAR support > > and assumes a PEAR installation (in the Auth subdirecto

Re: __perl_requires misbehaving in rawhide (rpm or grep broken??)

2011-02-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 02/03/2011 12:28 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 03/02/11 10:15, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> On 02/03/2011 09:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >>> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:59:07 -0500 >>> Tom Lanewrote: >>> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail about

autocc on review requests in bugzilla doesent work anymore.

2011-02-03 Thread Rudolf Kastl
Heyyas, Actually since my mailbox was filled recently and mail bounced for a short time period i do not get any review-request mails anymore from bugzilla. Can someone actually check the autocc on it? Other mails from bugzilla arrive (again). kind regards, Rudolf Kastl -- devel mailing list deve

Re: __perl_requires misbehaving in rawhide (rpm or grep broken??)

2011-02-03 Thread Paul Howarth
On 03/02/11 10:15, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 02/03/2011 09:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:59:07 -0500 >> Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail >>> about >>> >>> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc

Re: __perl_requires misbehaving in rawhide (rpm or grep broken??)

2011-02-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 02/03/2011 09:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:59:07 -0500 > Tom Lane wrote: > >> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail >> about >> >> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc.pl) >> >> The depchecker is correct about that: th