It seems that the "core" yum group pulls in X11 libraries, at the very
least on x86_64, via the following dependency chain:
policycoreutils
dbus-glib
gobject-introspection
cairo
libX11
Does that much seriously need to be in what we consider a bare minimum
Fedora install?
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:20:00PM +0100, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
> Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 à 22:10 +0100, Haïkel Guémar a écrit :
> > Le 21/01/2011 21:45, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > > I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
> > > LDC2 need source file from the garbage c
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:45:33PM +0100, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
> Hi,
> I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
> LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
> and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC2
> so how i could package this ?
>
> can i add druntime in
Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 à 22:10 +0100, Haïkel Guémar a écrit :
> Le 21/01/2011 21:45, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
> > LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
> > and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC
Le 21/01/2011 21:45, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
> Hi,
> I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
> LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
> and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC2
> so how i could package this ?
>
> can i add druntime in same package as L
Hi,
I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC2
so how i could package this ?
can i add druntime in same package as LDC2 ?
--
jonathan MERCIER
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252249
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474667&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:57:09 -0800, Brad wrote:
>
>> I am using the compile directive
>> -I%{buildroot}%{_includedir}
>> during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed
>> copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-21
13:22:56 EST ---
perl-CGI-Simple-1.113-1.el6 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-21
13:23:09 EST ---
perl-CGI-Simple-1.113-1.fc13 has been submitted as an upda
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-21
13:23:22 EST ---
perl-CGI-Simple-1.113-1.el5 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-21
13:23:35 EST ---
perl-CGI-Simple-1.113-1.fc14 has been submitted as an upda
2011/1/18 Toshio Kuratomi :
> +1 to FPC blessing. Like I said, we can probably carve up something that
> explains both the waf POV and configure scripts here... but it'll need
> someone who knows waf to be able to explain, for instance, how waf differs
> from autoconf which has both a non-bundled
On Fri, 21.01.11 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > If /tmp is not supposed to be used for data that is inconvenient to
> > store in memory for whatever reason, and that should be automatically
> > removed when it is not used, what _is_ it supposed to be used for?
>
> The FH
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:37:21AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Nathanael D. Noblet píše v Čt 20. 01. 2011 v 00:33 -0700:
> > On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > >> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing t
Hello,
[It looks like my earlier post did not hit the list, so making this post again]
We are conducting a Fedora Rawhide Test Day on "Network Device Naming" on
Thursday, January 27th 2011.
The objective is to test the new naming scheme for onboard and PCI add-in
network interfaces as suggeste
16 matches
Mail list logo
