Dne 19.1.2011 07:53, Haïkel Guémar napsal(a):
> Morale: that's just *PLAIN USELESS* to only remove the -fexceptions from
> flags, anyway, it's already there. And sleeping might be a good thing.
+1 for a good example of disaster which IMHO happens see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51
hi,
after a good night of sleep, i just noticed that *just* removing the
-fexceptions flag won't change anything.
-fexceptions is for C code linking to C++ code, but it's already default
when compiling C++, then you have to use the -fno-exceptions flag
instead if you really want to disable that fe
I am taking ghc-ansi-terminal
Here is mine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-process-leksah
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine:
>
> * freeDiameter: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877
>
> * CU
Hi,
I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine:
* freeDiameter: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877
* CUnit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244
* ghc-ansi-terminal: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670701
Regards,
SK
--
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.sh
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 17:49 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've
> decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait
> to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to
> pull in 13 new pa
I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've
decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait
to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to
pull in 13 new packages - that's 13 too many, especially when one of
them (metacity)
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 00:34 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> > Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
> > Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
> > modifying lxsession to use comp
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
> Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
> modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me
> without window decorations an
so, -fexception is mandatory for building C++ libraries @ Fedora?
--
w
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me
without window decorations and a usable mouse
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 06:08:37PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> -fexception allows a C library to participate in C++ exception
> handling. It does not cost anything except extra data tables in the
> ELF file. Its presence matters in cases where a C library is used by
> a C++ program, for exam
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:56:22PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:07 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > and that explains how we missed the bnx2 firmware changes. Does this
> > mean you will not be merging from Linus going forward?
>
> We'll be *removing* the legacy firm
Pierre-Yves writes:
> [...]
> I have been looking into the review #668863 in which the packager for
> this library (who also happens to be upstream) is actually removing the
> flag "-fexceptions" from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the %build.
> [...]
> - Upstream does not want to have this flag on, saying t
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:07 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> and that explains how we missed the bnx2 firmware changes. Does this
> mean you will not be merging from Linus going forward?
We'll be *removing* the legacy firmware/ directory from Linus' tree.
I didn't intend to merge from there at a
Hi,
I have been looking into the review #668863 in which the packager for
this library (who also happens to be upstream) is actually removing the
flag "-fexceptions" from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the %build.
Asking this question on irc (on fedora-devel) as lead to a small
discussion without clear agreem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667873
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667873
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18
16:29:26 EST ---
perl-Test-SharedFork-0.15-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649761
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649761
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18
16:29:14 EST ---
perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.52-1.fc14 has been pushed to the
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:02, Dan Williams wrote:
> dependencies don't randomly change your networking setup. NM should
> only be started when explicitly enabled, which we do in the installer
> and the LiveCD explicitly when your system is initially installed.
> systemd didn't originally handle
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:21:38PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This is gnome-terminal you are talking about? Or Xfce Terminal?
gnome-terminal.
--
Matthew Miller
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
--
devel ma
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:00:57PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:04 +, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> >
> > It looks like that firmware is in Linus' tree, but somehow it is not in
> > Woodhouse's linux-firmware tree. That seems odd.
>
> Yeah, that's just broken. If the
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #516 Updates policy adjustments/change
Greeting,
I am seeking sponsorship on Package Submission
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667155, however I have not
received any feedback on this bug.
I've been going through the recommendations listed on the Fedora Wiki
for gaining sponsorship,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188380
--- Comment #4 from Steven Pritchard 2011-01-18 14:53:31 EST
---
I had my packages mass-branched for EPEL when it started. I t
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:53 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Ah, I've just pushed this build which simply disables the Python 3
> subpackage:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2728751
>
> It's a very minimal change to the spec file:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb
Frank Ch. Eigler píše v Út 18. 01. 2011 v 12:22 -0500:
> Hi -
>
> FYI, rawhide received a new build of systemtap-1.4 yesterday. (f13
> and f14 may get it too, subject to update policy & interest). Beyond
> its direct users, it affects those packages that build with the
> markers. A subsequent
Hi -
FYI, rawhide received a new build of systemtap-1.4 yesterday. (f13
and f14 may get it too, subject to update policy & interest). Beyond
its direct users, it affects those packages that build with the
markers. A subsequent rebuild of these will switch to the
new implementation. It should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474097&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 22:07 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 22:01, Jason D. Clinton
> wrote:
> This interesting though:
> $ ls
> -l /etc/systemd/system/dbus-org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.service
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 42 Oct 22
>
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:53 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:50:17PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > I am available and on it. Didn't realize that it was affecting the
> > buildroot. Will get it fixed ASAP.
>
> Ah, I've just pushed this build which simply disables
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:50:17PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:10 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > DEBUG util.py:247: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
> > > DEBUG util.py:247: librpm.so.1()(64bit) is needed
The lightweight tag 'perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el5' was created pointing to:
111f5f2... Merge branch 'master' into el6
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:10 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > DEBUG util.py:247: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
> > DEBUG util.py:247: librpm.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
> > deltarpm-3.6-0.4.20100708git.fc15.x86_64
> > DEBUG util.py:247:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:10:01PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Deltarpm FTBS at the moment due to Python 3 changes. I dunno if Jonathan
> is available to handle it but a provenpackager can fix it up easily by
> temporarily disabling the python3 package (which is broken at anyway, see
> http:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el6' was created pointing to:
111f5f2... Merge branch 'master' into el6
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
The lightweight tag 'perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el4' was created pointing to:
111f5f2... Merge branch 'master' into el6
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
Summary of changes:
e8de728... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Authen-DigestMD5 (*)
026df83... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
0223d06... dist-git conversion (*)
ddacc76... Tidy up changelog entry (*)
111f5f2... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*)
(*) This
Quick note for Rawhide users: I am in the process of landing Compiz 0.9
now. Adel and I have been testing the 0.9 migration in a side repo -
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/Compiz09/compiz09/ - for a while
now, and we're happy it's working pretty well. Note that we're using the
upstream 'compiz
Summary of changes:
e8de728... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Authen-DigestMD5 (*)
026df83... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
0223d06... dist-git conversion (*)
ddacc76... Tidy up changelog entry (*)
111f5f2... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*)
(*) This
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> DEBUG util.py:247: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
> DEBUG util.py:247: librpm.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
> deltarpm-3.6-0.4.20100708git.fc15.x86_64
> DEBUG util.py:247: librpmio.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
> deltarpm-3.6-0.4.20100708g
Summary of changes:
554a816... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
1ec910b... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
737fc90... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
b6b16fc... Minor clean-ups (*)
c4ee510... dist-git conversion (*)
d6a2e56... - 661697 rebuild for f
commit 111f5f2f717606fde4faa2ccd11a1a68fe924258
Merge: 0223d06 ddacc76
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Jan 18 14:06:12 2011 +
Merge branch 'master' into el6
perl-Authen-DigestMD5.spec | 25 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
--
Fedora Extr
commit ddacc76251b3caf7084cd50f4c36aeb031900081
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Jan 18 14:05:15 2011 +
Tidy up changelog entry
perl-Authen-DigestMD5.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Authen-DigestMD5.spec b/perl-Authen-DigestMD5.spec
Summary of changes:
e8de728... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Authen-DigestMD5 (*)
026df83... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
0223d06... dist-git conversion (*)
ddacc76... Tidy up changelog entry
111f5f2... Merge branch 'master' into el6
(*) This commit
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:53:01PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> DEBUG util.py:247: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
> DEBUG util.py:247: librpm.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
> deltarpm-3.6-0.4.20100708git.fc15.x86_64
> DEBUG util.py:247: librpmio.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
> delta
DEBUG util.py:247: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
DEBUG util.py:247: librpm.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
deltarpm-3.6-0.4.20100708git.fc15.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:247: librpmio.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
deltarpm-3.6-0.4.20100708git.fc15.x86_64
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Re
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:04 +, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>
> It looks like that firmware is in Linus' tree, but somehow it is not in
> Woodhouse's linux-firmware tree. That seems odd.
Yeah, that's just broken. If the driver/firmware ABI changes
incompatibly and the kernel gets updated so that
Greetings!
Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
organizing the events.
Please review it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/t
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Andy Gospodarek
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:35 PM
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Cc: Iyer, Shyam; david.woodho...@intel.com; Rose, C
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 12:22 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>>> I now seem to be running into some problems building deltarpm for
>>> Rawhide and it seems to be tied into this. See
>>> h
51 matches
Mail list logo
