Orphaning a bunch of rubygem packages

After some ideological changes at work with rubygems and some changes in my personal life I don't have much motivation to maintain these. I'd imagine a decent number of these could disappear without any complaints. Tossing them up for grabs. rubygem-ParseTree rubygem-RubyInline rubygem-ZenTest

Re: Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 20:12 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 17:34 -0500, Andy Lawrence wrote: > > > Is there a package we can down-grade to get back up and running? Or > > an update via Koji? > > With the gnome-shell, gjs and gobject-introspection builds that are in > koji

Re: Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 17:34 -0500, Andy Lawrence wrote: > Is there a package we can down-grade to get back up and running? Or > an update via Koji? With the gnome-shell, gjs and gobject-introspection builds that are in koji now, things should be much better. At least on my system, things work fi

Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:04 +, Adam Williamson wrote: >* On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:28 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:*>* > After "yum >erase"ing rhythmbox (it did hold back some hundreds of updates),*>* > and >rebooting into my Gnome/Openbox session (and leaving, the screensaver*>* > >kicked

Re: selinux: rhel5 x fedora 14

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/12/2011 04:03 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:02:21 -0500 > Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 01/12/2011 06:29 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have two HDs on my computer: one with rhel5 5.5 and the other with >>> fedora

Re: selinux: rhel5 x fedora 14

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:02:21 -0500 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 01/12/2011 06:29 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have two HDs on my computer: one with rhel5 5.5 and the other with > > fedora 14. > > Both systems share some directories located in a common /home, > > mainly used by the

Re: AF_INET6 sockets and IPv4 connections, etc.

On 1/11/11 8:25 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Philip Prindeville > > wrote: > > so how can I tell in a couple of lines of code if the connection will > result in IPv4? > > > I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2011-01-11)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-01-12) === Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:33 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-01-12/fesco.2011-01-12-17.30.log.html Meeting summary -

[Bug 668935] Patch for TIAA-CREF price quote updates

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668935 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-12 13:35:26 EST --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.17-5.fc14 has been submitted as an up

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-01-11)

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:33:06 +0100 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 09:40:02 am Jóhann B. Guðmundsson > wrote: > > On 01/11/2011 08:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > #topic #515 Investigate a "features" repo for stable releases > > > .fesco 515 > > > > I think this is a good

Re: selinux: rhel5 x fedora 14

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/12/2011 06:29 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > Hi, > > I have two HDs on my computer: one with rhel5 5.5 and the other with > fedora 14. > Both systems share some directories located in a common /home, mainly > used by the httpd process. > > The p

Re: Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:04 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:28 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > After "yum erase"ing rhythmbox (it did hold back some hundreds of updates), > > and rebooting into my Gnome/Openbox session (and leaving, the screensaver > > kicked in) I fou

Re: selinux: rhel5 x fedora 14

On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 09:29 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > Hi, > > I have two HDs on my computer: one with rhel5 5.5 and the other with > fedora 14. > Both systems share some directories located in a common /home, mainly > used by the httpd process. > > The problem is that selinux in fedora 14

Re: Review swap (help gPodder packaging)

2011/1/12 Ville-Pekka Vainio : > Hi all, > > I'd like to swap reviews, my package: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643199 > python-pymtp - A Pythonic wrapper around libmtp I'll take it. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Review swap (help gPodder packaging)

Hi all, I'd like to swap reviews, my package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643199 python-pymtp - A Pythonic wrapper around libmtp A bit of background for this one: I'm a co-maintainer of the gpodder package, though I've been doing most of the work for that package lately. A couple

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-01-11)

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:59:08PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. Note that we may not have quorum, so may adjourn > early. > I'm going to be la

selinux: rhel5 x fedora 14

Hi, I have two HDs on my computer: one with rhel5 5.5 and the other with fedora 14. Both systems share some directories located in a common /home, mainly used by the httpd process. The problem is that selinux in fedora 14 uses "unrestricted_u" by default for all users, which rel5 does not underst

Orphaning tigase ... fast XMPP/Jabber server written in pure Java

Hi, I have not enough energy and knowledge to maintain a large Java server in Fedora, so I am orphaning tigase (that's tigase-xmltools, tigase-utils, and tigase-server). I have released ownership of all three packages in Fedora Pkg Database. AFAIK, I believe that all three packages are properly p

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-01-11)

On 01/11/2011 08:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > #topic #515 Investigate a "features" repo for stable releases > .fesco 515 I think this is a good direction to take for those that want more *Bleeding edge/Next release* stuff on a stable release as in having technology preview/feature repos. What I