On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 18:29 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:19 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:56 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ah, printing.
> > >
> > > Is there anything that's not last century?
> > >
> >
> > So you are trying to def
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:19 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:56 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>
> >
> > ah, printing.
> >
> > Is there anything that's not last century?
> >
>
> So you are trying to defend the last-century firewall technology by
> calling everything that wan
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:56 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>
> ah, printing.
>
> Is there anything that's not last century?
>
So you are trying to defend the last-century firewall technology by
calling everything that wants to share data last century ?
That seems not the most constructive attitud
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 17:04 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:44 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501227
> >
> > I'm writing to devel list just if anybody can say will there be any
> > chance to get nautilus an
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:29:44PM +, mike cloaked wrote:
>> I was recently testing an f14 install on an old laptop without wifi
>> hardware - so I bought a small usb wifi adapter (MicroNext MN-WD550M
>> Wireless USB 2.0 Adaptor) and this is re
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:58:19 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> 2011/1/6 Michał Piotrowski :
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a bug
> > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53632
> > which can be a PITA on 32-bit systems.
> >
> > Fix is in php svn repo - commit r307168
>
> Stop using 32bit in 2011 ;)
>
> OK jokes aside y
2011/1/6 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> There is a bug
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53632
> which can be a PITA on 32-bit systems.
>
> Fix is in php svn repo - commit r307168
Stop using 32bit in 2011 ;)
OK jokes aside you should file a bug if there is one open instead of
posting it here.
--
d
Hi,
There is a bug
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53632
which can be a PITA on 32-bit systems.
Fix is in php svn repo - commit r307168
--
Best regards,
Michal
Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:36:06PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:31:59 +0100
> Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> > No, I anyone pres the 'add to group' buttoun the mail will be
> > sent to all sponsors. Such behaviour is called spaming, because
> > I'm really not interessting which p
Thanks for the details. I will work with my sponsor (Richard Jones) to
get the formal review completed.
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 13:30 -0600, BJ Dierkes wrote:
> Adam,
>
> First, thank you for joining as a Fedora contributor. You need to complete
> the following before submitting for SCM module:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659131
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472121&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:31:59 +0100
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> No, I anyone pres the 'add to group' buttoun the mail will be
> sent to all sponsors. Such behaviour is called spaming, because
> I'm really not interessting which people are sponsors by other
> sponsors.
Well, in the past that would be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649761
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 19:19, Adam Litke wrote:
> Hello all. I am a new Fedora packager and am following the process to
> create a new package. The associated bugzilla is 638647 [1]. At this
> point I am trying to request a new SCM module for my package and have
> followed the documented steps
Adam,
First, thank you for joining as a Fedora contributor. You need to complete the
following before submitting for SCM module:
Find a sponsor. As this is your first package, you must have a 'proven
packager' sponsor you. See [1]
The sponsor must complete a formal review of your package. A
Well, you missed yesterday morning's run and I skipped over that package
in this morning's run because the ticket isn't assigned to anyone. I
intend to go back over the tickets I skipped, figure out what's gone
wrong with them and add comments but I have not yet found the time to do
that today.
A
Hello all. I am a new Fedora packager and am following the process to
create a new package. The associated bugzilla is 638647 [1]. At this
point I am trying to request a new SCM module for my package and have
followed the documented steps [2] but nothing has happened in 24 hours.
Is this an aut
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Jon Ciesla writes:
>>
>>
>>> So should simply patching to call mysql_thread_end instead should do the
>>> trick?
>>>
>>>
>> Right.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
> I'll give that a whirl, thanks!
> J
>
>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:02:20PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> John Reiser wrote:
>
> >> Over the past few months, the Fedora Board has focused on coming up
> >> with two or three overarching goals that can be accomplished over the
> >> next few release cycles. We've got a fairly healthy list of g
John Reiser wrote:
>> Over the past few months, the Fedora Board has focused on coming up
>> with two or three overarching goals that can be accomplished over the
>> next few release cycles. We've got a fairly healthy list of goals at
>> this point, ...
>
> Please post a link to the current list
> Over the past few months, the Fedora Board has focused on coming up
> with two or three overarching goals that can be accomplished over the
> next few release cycles. We've got a fairly healthy list of goals at
> this point, ...
Please post a link to the current list of goals. Thank you.
--
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jon Ciesla writes:
>
>> So should simply patching to call mysql_thread_end instead should do the
>> trick?
>>
>
> Right.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
I'll give that a whirl, thanks!
J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d
Summary of changes:
d464fc1... initial import (*)
031ffc1... initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
Summary of changes:
97ab63a... update to 1.001 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Summary of changes:
22f3cc4... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
9ffee30... - update to latest upstream (*)
e04a1a6... dist-git conversion (*)
0eb94ef... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*)
ed661fc... update to 1.04 (*)
02501dd... initial psuedo merge for dist
commit 97ab63ad6cc6c56eeb29bc68e237b4471c17ff5b
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Jan 6 16:53:14 2011 +0100
update to 1.001
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Perl-PrereqScanner.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(
Summary of changes:
372beb2... Initialize branch F-13 for perl-HTML-Defang (*)
b46520b... - update to latest upstream (*)
c801b19... dist-git conversion (*)
0eb94ef... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*)
ed661fc... update to 1.04 (*)
02501dd... initial psuedo me
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-PrereqScanner:
94c5670fa5fa081c8eace53bc4ce0cda Perl-PrereqScanner-1.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
commit 02501ddf3dc848a4877a988f3bb90c13fd520fa9
Merge: ed661fc c801b19
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Jan 6 16:48:24 2011 +0100
initial psuedo merge for dist-git setup
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.f
commit ed661fcecc8d4739219daa4d5af51351527017cc
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Jan 6 16:47:53 2011 +0100
update to 1.04
.gitignore|1 +
perl-HTML-Defang.spec | 14 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --
Summary of changes:
372beb2... Initialize branch F-13 for perl-HTML-Defang (*)
b46520b... - update to latest upstream (*)
c801b19... dist-git conversion (*)
ed661fc... update to 1.04
02501dd... initial psuedo merge for dist-git setup
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no
The lightweight tag 'perl-Dist-CheckConflicts-0.02-2.fc15' was created pointing
to:
fa57707... Initial import of perl-Dist-CheckConflicts-0.02-2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Hello,
There is an ABI breakage with OpenCV 2.2 update.
Actually it is more a rename (1) , so as soon as your package rely on
pkgconfig or opencv.cmake, thats should be silent.
Here is a koji --scratch build for dist-rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2704279
The packages
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Defang:
c26fb25f458a913447e584e8fe97af9c HTML-Defang-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Summary of changes:
d464fc1... initial import (*)
031ffc1... initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
commit 031ffc148b21f2b825e5b4b9733e536568aa8c5f
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Jan 6 16:42:27 2011 +0100
initial import
perl-Package-Pkg.spec | 51 +
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Package-Pkg.spec b
commit d464fc10e533ec931cc1ca697571c8fc7c93b741
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Jan 6 16:40:32 2011 +0100
initial import
.gitignore |1 +
sources|1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..c980ca2 100644
--- a/.g
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Pkg:
6cc3c3afae2f863ccf92d61f945d2d8d Package-Pkg-0.0019.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:33:46 -0600, you wrote:
>Well, nobody can apply to the packager group; it is invite-only. There
>may be a few people in the sponsorship queue from before the invite-only
>functionality was implemented.
Yes, when I logon on FAS
Summary of changes:
36de3cd... Update to 0.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Over the past few months, the Fedora Board has focused on coming up
with two or three overarching goals that can be accomplished over the
next few release cycles. We've got a fairly healthy list of goals at
this point, and welcome your input in helping us decide which two or
three goals are most i
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:29:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > -p 0x8035 -j I-vnet0-rarp
>
> Who still uses RARP?
libvirt doesn't really care what protocols guest VMs use
on their network. We're simply providing a mec
42 matches
Mail list logo
