On 12/10/2010 07:03 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
>>
>>> The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
>>> have executable permissions.
>>
>> Why? If they (example scripts
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
>> The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
>> have executable permissions.
>
> Why? If they (example scripts etc) don't add any dependencies that aren't
> already
On 12/09/2010 07:43 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
>> The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
>> have executable permissions.
>
> Why?
The issue Spot tries to address with this change, is to prevent rpm's
dependency trac
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
>> The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
>> have executable permissions.
>
> Why? If they (example scripts etc) don't add any dependencies that aren't
> already in the package's dependency
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:39:24 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 07:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > I have trouble following what you're saying here. At what point does
> > one need to "read the whole debuginfo file"?
>
> I'm referring to this:
> https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/crash-
Yesterday Miloslav Trma said:
Curtis Doty píÿÿe v St 08. 12. 2010 v 01:02 -0800:
Monday Miloslav Trma said:
Just disable the firewall and you'll get pretty much equivalent
functionality.
How? Now that the filter table and stateful connection tracking, aren't
modules anymore. They now appear
This plugin did not work as I had hoped it would, and I have no use for
it anymore.
pghmcfc was a co-maintainer, and is welcome to take it over, more
co-maintainers welcome as well.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
--
devel mailing list
deve
Am Dienstag, den 07.12.2010, 13:29 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Pdfmerge: Command line utility program for merging PDF files
Took the ownership for that one. Co-Maintainers welcome. :)
Regards,
Dominic
--
Dominic Hopf
http://dominichopf.de/
Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 A
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654773
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
biosdevname, now version 0.3.3.
I re-added the PCI IRQ Routing Table lookup code. This is used as a
fallback, in the event system BIOS doesn't provide index and label
information in a way we can get at via sysfs, or via reading SMBIOS
directly. This is necessary as quite a few systems I want to
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 14:53 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we ca
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:53:20 -0500
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we
On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
>>> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened
It's that time of year again. I'm heading off to Antarctica again,
which means I'll effectively be unavailable to do any meaningful
Fedora related work.
Since I went through this last year, most if not all of my packages
should have coverage with existing co-maintainers. I'll be checking in
which
On 12/09/2010 07:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
>>> 2) I really dislike that "local trace generation" and "retrace server"
>>> are discussed as though they're the only options. If nothing else, for
>>> many non-trivial apps where abrt is pot
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:39:50PM -0600, BJ Dierkes wrote:
>
> > All three pieces follow each release meaning, when 0.8.12 (current stable)
> > was released... new tarbals were released for all three. The reason for
> > separate tarb
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> > 2) I really dislike that "local trace generation" and "retrace server"
> > are discussed as though they're the only options. If nothing else, for
> > many non-trivial apps where abrt is potentially of the most use the core
> > you're up
On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
> The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
> have executable permissions.
Why? If they (example scripts etc) don't add any dependencies that aren't
already in the package's dependency chain, what is the problem solve
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:24 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >
> >> so, can we call the RFE: "attach backtrace even when dupe is found" ?
> >
> > or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe
I'm building Audacious 2.4.2 in Rawhide, and once available in the koji build
root, this will require rebuilds of the separate _plugin_ packages.
The tools/apps linked with Audacious' core libraries are not affected:
audtty
conky
2.4.2 is the first maintenance release in the [supposed to be s
On 12/09/2010 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
>>> 4) Reporting to bugzilla without being able to scrape the bz username
>>> and password out of the firefox credential store is just cruel.
>
>> - added as: "share bz credential with other
On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
>> so, can we call the RFE: "attach backtrace even when dupe is found" ?
>
> or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if current
> backtrace is better than any already attached
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Could we turn this into 'use the same reporting system as selinux'? It's
> absurd that they use different ones, you should merge them.
Something like: *cough* Event Log *cough* ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> 18:53:17 i've heard a modest amount of complaints that abrt is doing
>> more harm than good
>> 18:53:53 along multiple axes, but in particular it's simply too much
>> data for apps like firefox and evo for maintainers to respond to
>> 18:54
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660836
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> so, can we call the RFE: "attach backtrace even when dupe is found" ?
or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if current
backtrace is better than any already attached to the bug*'.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Mo
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> > 4) Reporting to bugzilla without being able to scrape the bz username
> > and password out of the firefox credential store is just cruel.
> - added as: "share bz credential with other apps"
> - not sure if we can share the credentials w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660832
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> > Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
> > ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
> > (or some other threshold):)
>
commit 03490fd04bffce74665296071d8f1570f78939fa
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Dec 9 18:03:42 2010 +0100
update to 2.06
- fixes FTBFS RHBZ#660836
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
.gitignore|1 +
perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP.spec |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP:
5bbb34dd9525e2c5a93d0199338ded91 POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-2.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660763
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
commit f33c61364c51efc5de6e261f33aa52a2ea2d6a93
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Dec 9 17:55:48 2010 +0100
update to 1.1006
- fixes FTBFS RHBZ#660832
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Component-SNMP.spec | 17 +++--
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-SNMP:
9a2ef36ca0c40e030f0af35174a67172 POE-Component-SNMP-1.1006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
commit c6ad27627536ec9617cb741fa41082dd45b3d878
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Dec 9 17:48:58 2010 +0100
update to latest upstream version
- fixes FTBFS RHBZ#660763
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC.spec
* Jiri Moskovcak [09/12/2010 17:42] :
>
> so, can we call the RFE: "attach backtrace even when dupe is found" ?
- "Always attach backtrace"
- "Do not do so in Bugzilla"
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 12/09/2010 05:31 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Jeu 9 décembre 2010 15:52, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
>
>> It has never done so for me (on fedora 13 + fedora 14). ABRT always
>> instructs me to run debuginfo-install, which will fail for obvious
>> reasons in a normal user environment and thus r
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC:
661bc794859c8f8c432e80b1904aad10 HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.08002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
Le Jeu 9 décembre 2010 15:52, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
> It has never done so for me (on fedora 13 + fedora 14). ABRT always
> instructs me to run debuginfo-install, which will fail for obvious
> reasons in a normal user environment and thus requires me to become root
> (On "real ordinary user" s
Gathering the RFEs at: https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/wiki/Wishlist
On 12/09/2010 04:51 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
> but please keep the gratuitous "me too"ing to a minimum.
>
> 1) The generated reports contain far too little i
commit 025e40e0fd505d71a4c3cececa57d510818ec4dc
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Dec 9 17:18:03 2010 +0100
update to 0.09
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Math-Base36.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Base36:
3af1a961e45c0e367e78685a518f5dde Math-Base36-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660952
--- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová 2010-12-09 11:09:06
EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> There is some race as it sometimes
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
> but please keep the gratuitous "me too"ing to a minimum.
>
> 1) The generated reports contain far too little information for library
> owners. Consider this report:
On 12/09/2010 03:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 02:59 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> On 12/09/2010 02:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak w
Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
but please keep the gratuitous "me too"ing to a minimum.
1) The generated reports contain far too little information for library
owners. Consider this report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658013
I get the EV
On 12/09/2010 08:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
> - debuginfo-install is just a fallback if ABRT fails to retrieve the
> debuginfo itself (and ABRT doesn't need the root privs, as is *does not*
> install the packages, it just unpacks them)
>
> Jirka
Currently, abrt says the debuginfo packages ar
Here are the latest set of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
---
A new page has been added which describes how to deal with bundled
libraries when you find them in your package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries
---
Some clarification has been add
On 12/09/2010 02:59 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 02:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>> On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupe
> "PR" == Peter Robinson writes:
PR> My understanding was that if it was blocked it had to go through
PR> review again.
Depends on how long:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
"
Re-review required for older packages
If a package was last updated more
On 12/09/2010 02:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
ABRT to allow rep
On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
>>> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then o
On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
>> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
>> (or some other threshold):)
>
> Dont we loos
On 02:18:47 pm Thursday, December 09, 2010 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> > Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
> > ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
> > (or some other threshold
Compose started at Thu Dec 9 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
cpm-0.23-0.3.beta.fc1
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
> (or some other threshold):)
Dont we loose hard to catch odd ball bugs if that's implemented?
JBG
--
d
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:18 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Is there a compelling reason for this not to be:
>
> - cups snmp backend says to "the firewall", "hey, please allow
> responses on this port I've got"
> - cups snmp backend listens for responses until timeout
> - cups snmp backend says t
On 12/09/2010 10:55 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 10:38 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>>> 18:53:17 i've heard a modest amount of complaints that abrt is
>>> doing more harm than good
>>> 18:53:53 along multiple axes, but in particular it's simply too
>>> much data for apps like firefox an
On 12/09/2010 10:38 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> 18:53:17 i've heard a modest amount of complaints that abrt is doing
>> more harm than good
>> 18:53:53 along multiple axes, but in particular it's simply too much
>> data for apps like firefox and evo for maintainers to respond to
>> 18:54:22 i don
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661472
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
> 18:53:17 i've heard a modest amount of complaints that abrt is doing
> more harm than good
> 18:53:53 along multiple axes, but in particular it's simply too much
> data for apps like firefox and evo for maintainers to respond to
> 18:54:22 i don't have any particular suggestions for this (we
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:48:26AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > so are all these bugs, for that matter: they're actual bugs encountered
>> > by Matt. The package failing to bui
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 09:45 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
>> One use of features (and I don't want to say the only one!!!) is for
>> marketing
>> purposes. And actually - it works! I read several Fedora reviews, people
>> talking
>> abou
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 09:45 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> One use of features (and I don't want to say the only one!!!) is for
> marketing
> purposes. And actually - it works! I read several Fedora reviews, people
> talking
> about nice new features in Fedora they installed - but that featur
I didn't mean to say that using a VM was a bad thing. It's an obvious
improvement over mock. Attacks that elevate to root in the host are
in the realm of highly theoretical at the moment.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: F
65 matches
Mail list logo
