On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 13:02 +0200, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > I see [1] the libical is not orphaned yet, neither in devel, nor in F14,
> > as I "only" can add myself to the package, but not take ownership as
> > with other orphaned packages.
>
> I think what happens is when the owner orphans a packag
Hi,
W dniu 3 grudnia 2010 09:14 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
[..]
> What services are installed by default when installong form Live
> GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD?
Ok, let's ask the question differently - what services should be run
by default to provide working system for desktop user?
IMO
8:08pm Ricky Zhou said:
> On 2010-12-05 04:56:36 PM, Curtis Doty wrote:
>> But the equivalent 'git pull' doesn't work as I'd expect. It appears the
>> clone -B option above sets the wrong non-anonymous url inside each branch.
>> Am I missing something?
> Nope, looks like you found a bug. Here's a
On 2010-12-05 04:56:36 PM, Curtis Doty wrote:
> But the equivalent 'git pull' doesn't work as I'd expect. It appears the
> clone -B option above sets the wrong non-anonymous url inside each branch.
> Am I missing something?
Nope, looks like you found a bug. Here's a patch that should fix it.
ht
Catching up on the new paradigm...after a bit of tinkering, I've finally
found the new git'fied:
fedpkg clone -a -B foo
equivalent to the old:
cvs -qd:pserver:anonym...@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs co foo
But alas, after I have my anonymous clone, I cannot update it with the
Hi there,
I have packaged Xfce 4-8 pre 2 for Fedora 14 and Rawhide. You can find
the packages at
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8/
The repo is far from complete. ATM it is still rsyncing and Fedora 13 is
still building. Also a couple of applications that need a rebuild (e.g.
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:28:20PM +0200, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> The Go frontend has been committed to GCC trunk:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-12/msg00117.html
>
> I checked the wiki, but there doesn't seem to be any mention of GCC
> 4.6 on the F15 feature list:
>
> http://fedoraproject
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:44 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501227
>
> I'm writing to devel list just if anybody can say will there be any
> chance to get nautilus and tracker integration working? Is this on
> anybody's radar?
>
> Thanks,
> Valen
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:48:13 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I think it'd probably fit better in the preamble before step 1. Perhaps
> after the paragraph 'As a Contributor, you should...' we add a paragraph
> explaining that as a packager you will automatically be given
> proventester pr
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> To prevent overzealous maintainers, who believe to understand what they
>> are doing but actually don't, from doing harm to packages.
>
> Trust me, after I'm done yelling at them, they won't do that ever again. ;-)
En
Compose started at Sun Dec 5 08:15:15 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
balsa-2.4.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libesmtp.so.5()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
>
>
> So what exactly is the process for getting a new group into comps? The
> wiki[1] indicates that one just needs to consult the devel list for
> approval. Over on the Robotics SIG list, we are throwing around the idea of
> adding a Robotic
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 19:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
> > OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
> > (read: a >100MB download
13 matches
Mail list logo
