Hi,
On 11/24/2010 12:45 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 10/5/10 3:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> Here is a list of the current known potentially bad builds and what
> action could be or has been taken:
>
> wildmidi - my rebuild can be tagged
> tecnoballz - my build can be tagged
These 2 are min
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 20:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Meanwhile, NetworkManager is doing absolutely nothing for me, and is taking
> up a USS of 65.3M. If we're gonna tilt at memory consumption windmills, how
> about we take a look at that one?
Are you sure that's right? According to htop, it
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> That way most distros would only have to install one getty implementation,
> and can use it for both serial consoles and VCs.
Yes please.
Bonus points for anaconda configuring a working agetty login if the install
console was serial. That is, run
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:39, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 11:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> They said that they install a Fedora for testing
>> purposes when it first comes out and enjoy the rapid pace of bugfixes as
>> they test the software in their environment. Then, the update pac
On 11/23/10 5:04 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> Please alphabetize such a list, always! _PLEASE_?
> An alphabetized list is several times more effective at communication
> because advanced readers can process it more quickly "by eye"
> than a list that is in random order. Most mail user agent (MUA) sof
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> The spec page says it'll be better, but is very vague as to why.
>
> Basically, I'm looking for a "Doing this will keep $X kilobytes
> permanently pinned in RAM (in the form of dentry and inode structs) and
> $Y bytes in RAM or swap (in the form of file
On 11/23/2010 07:36 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 19:13:09, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> Another related thing is that Berkeley DB which openldap uses is
>> notoriously picky about getting updated. I'm fairly certain openldap does
>> not update their bundled BDB version to preven
Jan Vcelak wrote:
> This is the problem: The database migration could take a really long time. I
> have testing data with 56 entries (nodes) - exporting (slapcat) is quite
> fast,
> but importing (slapadd) takes around 10 seconds.
Hmm. I've seen selinux-policy-targeted take longer than this on
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:54:47PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I think the fact that we get less disks accesses (just think noatime and
> stuff for the files dropped there) is more interesting than using the
> absolute minimal amount of memory.
Less disk access at startup, or in general som
Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said:
> > MP> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
> > MP> scripts?
> >
> > repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
>
> It seems to me that too little packages was returned
Add '/etc/rc.d/init.d/*' too; while they both resolve to
Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:05 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
>
> I'm not going to be able to make this,
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
> action should be coordinated.
>
> Comments, thoughts?
I would certainly welcome any work in this direction!
I think it would make sense to use Johan
On 11/23/2010 03:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Here is a list of the current known potentially bad builds and what
> action could be or has been taken:
Please alphabetize such a list, always! _PLEASE_?
An alphabetized list is several times more effective at communication
because advanced readers
On Tue, 23.11.10 18:44, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> W dniu 23 listopada 2010 18:35 użytkownik philippe makowski
> napisał:
> > 2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
> >> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> >> napisał:
> >>> We can create a list of all scr
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:05 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
I'm not going to be able to make this, I'll be on the road for
Thanksgiving.
- ajax
--
On 11/23/10 3:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:45:26PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> gcc - update in -candidate, ping jakub
>
> Just remove gcc from your list. gcc is bootstrapped, so
> the installed gcc only builds first stage, everything else
> is built by (one of the)
On 11/23/2010 03:02 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:48:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn
>> on
>> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
>> with the following accepted F15
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:45:26PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> gcc - update in -candidate, ping jakub
Just remove gcc from your list. gcc is bootstrapped, so
the installed gcc only builds first stage, everything else
is built by (one of the) newly built compiler(s).
So, gcc in f14 surely doesn'
On 10/5/10 3:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a
> gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and
> Fedora 15. Items built with this could have undefined behavior, which
> could lead to data corruption.
>
> Un
On 11/23/2010 02:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 23.11.10 13:41, Nicholas Miell (nmi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
>>> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on
On Tue, 23.11.10 23:02, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote:
> The release notes section contains this:
> | /var/run and /var/lock are now mounted from tmpfs, and hence emptied on
> | reboot. Applications must ensure to recreate their own files/dirs on
> | startup, and cannot rely that doing th
On Tue, 23.11.10 13:41, Nicholas Miell (nmi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Heya!
> >
> > I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> > /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> > with the
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AH" == Adam Hough writes:
>
> AH> Someone with that right permissions need to change who maintains the
> AH> openjpeg package in Fedora.
>
> It has two comaintainers, so I don't really see what the issue is.
>
> I went ahead a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656515
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=462466&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:48:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn
> on
> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> with the following accepted F15 feature:
>░
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fe
On Tue, 23.11.10 22:44, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:32:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > Also note that by now it's somewhat standard that code that needs to be
> > run as part of early boot creates a subdir in /dev, such as /dev/.udev
> > or /de
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:32:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Also note that by now it's somewhat standard that code that needs to be
> run as part of early boot creates a subdir in /dev, such as /dev/.udev
> or /dev/.systemd. Not super-pretty, but I guess it's too late to
> complain about
On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> with the following accepted F15 feature:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/var
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2010 04:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 23.11.10 21:19, Paul Howarth (p...@city-fan.org) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:30 +0100
>> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> - In some cases daemons might want to create more than one
On Tue, 23.11.10 16:12, Doug Ledford (dledf...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 03:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Heya!
> >
> > I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> > /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> > with the f
On Tue, 23.11.10 21:19, Paul Howarth (p...@city-fan.org) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:30 +0100
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > - In some cases daemons might want to create more than one file/dir
> > below /var/run which are supposed to be labelled differently. In
> > this case the daem
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:30 +0100
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> - In some cases daemons might want to create more than one file/dir
> below /var/run which are supposed to be labelled differently. In
> this case the daemon can either be modified to fix its labels up
> itself, or a drop-in file in
On 11/23/2010 03:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> with the following accepted F15 feature:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/var
On 11/23/10 12:16 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:39:02AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/22/2010 11:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> They said that they install a Fedora for testing
>>> purposes when it first comes out and enjoy the rapid pace of bugfixes as
>>> they
Heya!
I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
/var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
with the following accepted F15 feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/var-run-tmpfs
My current tests indicate that we will not run into
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Huh? KDE trunk (4.6) already uses XRandR backlight setting in PowerDevil:
>>
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/xrandrbrightness.cpp?revision=1194096&view=
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:39:02AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 11:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > They said that they install a Fedora for testing
> > purposes when it first comes out and enjoy the rapid pace of bugfixes as
> > they test the software in their environment. Then, t
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic Updates policy
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
#
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Huh? KDE trunk (4.6) already uses XRandR backlight setting in PowerDevil:
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/xrandrbrightness.cpp?revision=1194096&view=markup
> and it appears to work
commit 9ca9b1658ed1c65de7c6297a24e1a17132aec3e3
Author: remi
Date: Tue Nov 23 20:02:27 2010 +0100
update to 1.09
.gitignore |3 ++-
perl-Apache-DBI.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> It might not to work for proprietary drivers, but that's those drivers'
>> problem. KDE basically requires XRandR since at least 4.0.
>>
>
> this is a fairly new thing, AIUI:
>
> http://mjg59.livejournal.com/1271
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:51 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Just submitted to updates-testing. Please, test.
>
> 656257 - Upgrade from 2.4.22-7 to 2.4.23-3 breaks slapd
> 655899 - outdated list of overlays in slapd.conf
> 652822 - ldapsearch -Z hangs server if starttls fails
>
> Jan
Many thanks Jan,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 19:13:09, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> Another related thing is that Berkeley DB which openldap uses is
>> notoriously picky about getting updated. I'm fairly certain openldap does
>> not update their bundled BDB version to prevent
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> On 10:05:21 am Sunday, November 21, 2010 Marius Andreiana wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After getting latest updates (glibc and eclise), I started getting
> > reproducible Eclipse out of memory errors (happens during AppEngine
> > deploys). Ha
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> We don't control RH bugzilla so changing bugzilla to be able to use fas to
> login would be problematic.
The right solution would really be to have a separate Fedora Bugzilla tied
in to Fedora infrastructure, with bug states which make sense for Fedora,
not RHEL etc.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:06:33PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > Afaik there is no need for a maintainer to set different acceptance
> > thresholds for his updates. At least nobody ever explained to me why
> > this would be helpful.
>
> * Upgrade paths! I DON'T want my foo-1.2.
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> -Installs PackageKit plugin to give karma through the gnome-packagekit
> GUI. (Nothing exists yet, but I'm gonna get started on one soon)
What about KPackageKit?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 05:30 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/23/10 5:55 AM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Currently, the upgrade process in openldap looks like this:
>>> * during db4 package upgrade run db_upgrade (%triggerin and %triggerun)
>>> * if minor
Tom Lane wrote:
> (And yeah, if we allow +1 autopush, we should definitely expect -1 is
> sufficient to unpush. Maybe bodhi should restrict the combination of
> those two settings, rather than either one alone?)
Well, we've started to use +1/-999 for some KDE updates. :-)
Kevin Kofler
-
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I believe Kevin would say his position is that the update is better than
> what's there already *sufficiently often* that allowing unrestricted
> updates is a net benefit (the question is whether an occasional bad
> update is a worse problem than some updates being delayed
Till Maas wrote:
> Afaik there is no need for a maintainer to set different acceptance
> thresholds for his updates. At least nobody ever explained to me why
> this would be helpful.
* Upgrade paths! I DON'T want my foo-1.2.3-4.fc13 update to go out before my
foo-1.2.3-4.fc14 update, even if it h
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> (And yeah, if we allow +1 autopush, we should definitely expect -1 is
> sufficient to unpush. Maybe bodhi should restrict the combination of
> those two settings, rather than either one alone?)
Not as long people give -1 for random crap "oh thi
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The bodhi 2.0 solution is to decouple autopush and acceptance: they
> really shouldn't be paired, I think it's just an unintended consequence
> of the current code. You should be able to set +1 threshold for
> acceptance allowing the maintainer to then push manually, and +3
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Install package from updates-testing, then +1 to karma after it works
> for you with your tests and normal workload.
The average user won't even KNOW there's an update available in updates-
testing before it's too late (i.e. all his/her data is gone, (s)he asks on
forums or IR
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> So you'll double, triple, ultra swear that this[1] will never happen
> again?
>
> [1]
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2008-December/002572.html
That wasn't a data corruption issue in the first place. It was a low-severity
security fix, and the fix
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 16:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Right, and the big point there should be that a bug which can corrupt
>> mail folders should be fixed IMMEDIATELY, i.e. with a direct stable push!
>> ANY testing requirement there is a failure.
>
> How about tes
Summary of changes:
00a0544... forgot to add -DUSE_SSL -DPRLDAP for the openldap case (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.
commit 00a0544321e44ecc180451ab680e896bd6550231
Author: Rich Megginson
Date: Tue Nov 23 10:47:50 2010 -0700
forgot to add -DUSE_SSL -DPRLDAP for the openldap case
Makefile.PL.rpm|2 +-
perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec |5 -
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
di
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> So feel free to push directly to stable as often as you want, but once
> you introduce one regression, you have to satisfy 10 karma on every
> package you update. The second time, you have to satisfy 20 karma on
> every package you update and so on.
At that point you can just
W dniu 23 listopada 2010 18:35 użytkownik philippe makowski
napisał:
> 2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
>> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>>> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
>>> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:32 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Note that Fedora #-2 does not fit into this view for things at all,
> >> Fedora #-2 is meant to allow people to skip a Fedora release. But in
> >> practice I think this works out badly, because a relatively new Fedora
> >> release like Fe
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 01:29:45PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Here's the latest list of ideas culled from this thread.
>
> Note: these are NOT my ideas, I am just gathering them up so fesco can
> discuss them.
>
> Feel free to add more concrete ideas, or let me know if I missed one
> you had p
Till Maas wrote:
> It is totally annoying and time consuming to hit fixed bugs again, just
> because the update has not been pushed from testing to stable. I cannot
> really imagine that I am the only one experiencing this ever and ever
> again. E.g. just today when I wanted to debug f-e-k on the F
2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
>> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
>> convert scripts themselves.
I'll try to do it for Firebird package
ca
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:21 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> So taking for example the much much discussed KDE rebases. I think that
>> doing a KDE rebase for Fedora #+1 is a no brainer, for Fedora # is fine
>> as long as it is properly tested and for Fedora #-1 KDE should N
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:44 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> > * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
> >> >
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:21 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Why was this update made on F14 in the first place?
> >
> IMO, this is the wrong question.
>
> The better questions would be - How could it happen, this package made
> it into updates, dispite all this QA bureaucracy is in place?
Reme
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:44 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> > * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
>> > any luck).
>>
>> Not without a pile of X changes, which themselves
On 11/23/2010 05:30 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/23/10 5:55 AM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Currently, the upgrade process in openldap looks like this:
>> * during db4 package upgrade run db_upgrade (%triggerin and %triggerun)
>> * if minor version of openldap changes (e.g. 2.3 -> 2.4), exp
2010/11/23 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 11/20/2010 11:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
>> action should be coordinated.
>>
>> Comments, thoughts?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Michal
>
> I created this a while back so just take
2010/11/23 Jason L Tibbitts III :
>> "MP" == Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
> MP> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
> MP> scripts?
>
> repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
It seems to me that too little packages was returned
>
> - J<
> --
> devel mailing list
On 11/20/2010 11:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
> action should be coordinated.
>
> Comments, thoughts?
>
> Kind regards,
> Michal
I created this a while back so just take your pick from there fill it
with a link to the n
Once upon a time, Jan Vcelak said:
> Am I allowed to write some additional output in %pre/%post scriptlets? And
> shall I use stdout or stderr? I haven't found it in guidelines.
No, because there's no telling where it will go.
> This is the problem: The database migration could take a really lo
On 11/23/10 5:55 AM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently, the upgrade process in openldap looks like this:
> * during db4 package upgrade run db_upgrade (%triggerin and %triggerun)
> * if minor version of openldap changes (e.g. 2.3 -> 2.4), export the database,
> delete it and import it back (
commit 59f06963e29f1e90761e07ee1a9925673091ab74
Merge: 37bf1d5 a8068ee
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Nov 23 17:26:06 2010 +0100
Merge branch 'master' into el6
.gitignore|1 +
perlbrew.spec | 15 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deleti
Summary of changes:
89ff2c1... initial import (*)
8d97dfc... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
528eadb... dist-git conversion (*)
a8068ee... update to 0.13 (*)
59f0696... Merge branch 'master' into el6
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 17:18:44 +0100,
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
> > We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
> > maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
> > convert scripts themselves.
>
On 11/22/10 11:32 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:33:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> It was my understanding o
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:18:44 +0100 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
> scripts?
>
> When I do
> rpm -qf /etc/init.d/*
> I get only information about already installed packages. Any magic
> switch to get informations about all packages from r
2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski :
> W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
>> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
>> convert scripts themselves.
>
> How can I get information about all p
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:09 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Am I allowed to write some additional output in %pre/%post scriptlets? And
> shall I use stdout or stderr? I haven't found it in guidelines.
I was always told "no output allowed", which is sad. Sure, it might not
be seen in all cases. What w
> "MP" == Michał Piotrowski writes:
MP> How can I get information about all packages that provides init
MP> scripts?
repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> "AH" == Adam Hough writes:
AH> Someone with that right permissions need to change who maintains the
AH> openjpeg package in Fedora.
It has two comaintainers, so I don't really see what the issue is.
I went ahead and gave those comaintainers approveacls permission on the
Fedora branches so
Il giorno mar, 23/11/2010 alle 15.55 +0100, Henrik Nordström ha scritto:
>
> Fedora do not normally include staging kernel drivers, but you can
> find them on rpmfusion.
>
> I have not looked into if the specific drivers you are looking for is
> there however.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
Thanks Henr
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
> maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
> convert scripts themselves.
How can I get information about all packages that provides init scripts?
When
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:09 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> This is the problem: The database migration could take a really long time. I
> have testing data with 56 entries (nodes) - exporting (slapcat) is quite
> fast,
> but importing (slapadd) takes around 10 seconds.
>
> Imagine you have a large
Someone with that right permissions need to change who maintains the
openjpeg package in Fedora. Callum Lerwick has been AWOL for a long time
now and has even said that he is not interested in long term maintenance of
packages in a post over a year ago.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dev
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 22:45 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:41:47AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > The thing is, we really need to be able to boot a kernel in qemu as
> > > non-root, and carrying around a separately compiled or packaged kerne
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:55 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> Patric, thank you for reporting this. And sorry for the difficulties.
You're welcome. And never mind for the difficulties: I understand your
trouble and I wouldn't be in such a sh... myself !
I succeeded in restoring the LDAP usability by do
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Paul F. Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you may be aware, Novell recently sold itself/merged/whatever to
> another company with the transfer of 882 patents to MS. No idea what
> this will mean with the SCO legal case, but hey.
>
> My question regards Mono now. With the
Hi,
As you may be aware, Novell recently sold itself/merged/whatever to
another company with the transfer of 882 patents to MS. No idea what
this will mean with the SCO legal case, but hey.
My question regards Mono now. With the sale of Novell and MS gaining a
pile of patents, will this affect th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317
Summary: libwx_gtk2u_stc-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
mån 2010-11-22 klockan 18:51 +0100 skrev Björn Persson:
> Henrik Nordström wrote:
> > * Slight adjustment of karma to provide choices "Works for me", "Problem
> > still present" and "New problems seen"
> >
> > * "Works for me" is a +1, and also adds the refereced bug as fixed by
> > the update if
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
>> On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
>>> While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
>>> following error occurred:
>>>
>>> Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
>>> Checking configurati
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
>> While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
>> following error occurred:
>>
>> Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
>> Checking configuration files for slapd: [FAILED]
>> bdb(dc=linuxdev,dc=dat
On 23/11/10 10:11, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
> While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server, the
> following error occurred:
>
> Stopping slapd: [ OK ]
> Checking configuration files for slapd: [FAILED]
> bdb(dc=linuxdev,dc=datasphere,dc=ch): Build signature doesn't match
> en
Compose started at Tue Nov 23 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
bognor-regis-0.6.11-1
hi, I want share a usb key via IP and I have found this project:
http://usbip.sourceforge.net/
Someone can help me to find the usbip_common_mod.ko, vhci-hcd.ko and
usbip.ko module for fedora 14?
Into Readme file of project, for build the driver i see this:
"For newer kernels ( >=2.6.28
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 11:23 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:11:13 +0100 Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
> > While applying today's updates on a machine running a slapd server,
> > the following error occurred: [...]
>
> Have you reported it as a bug against the openldap package?
Not
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
