On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 07:19 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:14:22PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 19:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > "RWMJ" == Richar
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:14:22PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 19:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
> > >
> > > RWMJ> I will take ocaml* and unison
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 08:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * F12 critical path/update testing issues. (does it matter this close to
> > EOL?)
>
> Now Fedora n-1 is F13 and we're already seeing the same sort of issues there
> (e.g. the KDE 4.5.3 (non-critpath) bugfix update ha
Hello,
filed month+ ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643296
Simple fix of memory corruption affecting various applications incl. Firefox.
Completed "Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers" there, got an
off-list reply but still no fix commit or commit rights approva
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 19:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
> >
> > RWMJ> I will take ocaml* and unison*.
> >
> > I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership.
>
> Done, t
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:22 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:46:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester
> > > manpower to make the current policy w
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 10:23 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> libconcord-0:0.21-10.fc14.i686
> libconcord-0:0.21-10.fc14.x86_64
This one's a bit tricky, as it does something unique that you can't do
any other way (it lets you program Logitech Harmony remote controls -
Logitech only provide a too
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 14:15 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I realize that most people on this mailing list are focused on
> infrastructure and server/desktop usage.
>
> But some of us are looking forward to using future Fedora releases on
> tablets in vehicular infotainment systems.
>
> To this en
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:35:03PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Firefox's spell checker just complained at me about "theater". It
> wants me to spell it as "theatre", instead.
There's an open bug about this since Fedora 9:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439598
Unfortunately, it h
Firefox's spell checker just complained at me about "theater". It wants me
to spell it as "theatre", instead.
Running aspell from the command line confirmed that it had to problems with
the Yankee spelling, so Firefox must be using its own dictionary, instead of
aspell. I distinctly remember a
> Good grief man, that's almost everybody who watches the BBC on their
> computer!
>
Yeah - flash is a necessary evil which I'd rather do without but cannot
(Australian ABC iView in my case!).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/d
I have two btrfs usb disks. If I attach them both at roughly the same
time to my computer, and Gnome is running, the computer freezes permanently.
If Gnome is not running, it doesn't crash.
Can anyone else reproduce this?
I haven't tested with any other filesystem yet.
Thanks.
--
devel maili
Hi John,
On 15 November 2010 23:44, John Poelstra wrote:
> Jared Smith made an announcement in his blog [1] about some upcoming
> personnel changes in Fedora. I wanted to make a specific announcement
> to the Fedora lists as well.
>
> Through the end of 2010 and a little bit beyond, I will be wo
> Isn't there any way we can update the icon cache spec to add a checksum
> or something? Or is the corruption just wrong data, not bad data? I
> periodically get nm-applet crashes due to a bad icon cache that I'd
> rather not have to care about...
>
As an aside, I have noticed nm-applet crashes
Kyle,
>From latest Rawhide kernel.rpm:
* Wed Nov 17 2010 Kyle McMartin
- Make vmlinuz/System.map root read-write only by default. You can
just chmod 644 them later if you (unlikely) need them without root.
This completely breaks libguestfs. We need to be able to read the
kernel image in orde
Dne 19.11.2010 15:40, Przemek Klosowski napsal(a):
> - freeze glibc to avoid this bug ever (OK, maybe this one isn't serious)
> - fix glibc or the flash wrapper to accommodate the buggy clients
> - bug Adobe to fix the bug ASAP, do nothing in Fedora
> - refuse to use flash and work towards replacin
The Fedora Board Town Hall happened today at 15:00 UTC. The transcript of
the townhall is at the following URL:
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-townhall/2010-11-19/board-townhall.2010-11-19-14.59.log.html
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-townhall/2010-11-19/board-town
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Isn't there any way we can update the icon cache spec to add a checksum
> or something? Or is the corruption just wrong data, not bad data?
Likely a lot of these are simply data corruption on power loss (Unix
default). We can try to avoid
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:46 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:23:26PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
> > >
> > > gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
> >
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:23:26PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
> >
> > gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
>
> > gdm[1622]: #9 0x0032031195aa in gtk_icon_theme_lookup_ic
Just to be clear this is F14 updates testing you are referring to?
-jef
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
>
> gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Hi.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:15:01 -0500, Dave Jones wrote
> Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
>
> gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
While this is certainly unfortunate, isn't that what u-t
is for?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
>
> gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
> gdm[1622]: #9 0x0032031195aa in gtk_icon_theme_lookup_icon () from
> /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> gdm[1622]: #10 0x00320311a08c in
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:15:01 -0500
Dave Jones wrote:
> Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
>
> gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
I'm not seeing this here. ;(
Not sure whats going on. Try reverting glibc update I guess?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
dev
On 11/19/2010 06:15 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:16:14PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Java Packaging Guidelines have been revised:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java
>>> Diff:
>>>
On 07:33:18 pm Friday, November 19, 2010 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:16:14PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
> >
> > wrote:
> > > The Java Packaging Guidelines have been revised:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packa
On 11/19/10 2:38 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> C, Java and Python are not the only programming languages in the world.
In case you missed it, I was poking fun at C as well.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:16:14PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
> wrote:
> >
> > The Java Packaging Guidelines have been revised:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java
> > Diff:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packagi
Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
NetworkManager[1059]: [1290185488.399900] [nm-manager.c:1332]
user_proxy_init(): could not init user settings proxy: (3) Could not get owner
of name 'org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings': no such nam
> "VS" == Ville Skyttä writes:
VS> It seems that the %jpackage_script tip/guideline did not make it
VS> into this revision, was there a reason for that or did it just fall
VS> through the cracks?
That was not part of the draft which we considered. Currently there are
no Java-related drafts
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
>
> The Java Packaging Guidelines have been revised:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java
> Diff:
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3AJava&diff=206526&oldid=154023
It seems that the %jpackage_script tip/g
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 02:23:22PM +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > rpm %post and %postun scripts have been added for the following
> > important pieces of GNOME3 technology: GSettings, gdk-pixbuf loaders,
> > GTK3 modules, and GIO mo
On Thursday 18 November 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Does this even need %pretrans at all? Rex Dieter used this in kde-settings-
> kdm:
> %pre kdm
> ## KDM fixup(s)
> # [snip similar hack for a moved/symlinked %config file]
> # handle %%_datadir/config/kdm -> /etc/kde/kdm
> [ -d %{_datadir}/config/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652158
--- Comment #4 from Harold Campbell 2010-11-19 11:01:45 EST
---
The :locked error goes away, but now there is this:
Constant
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 21:12 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/18/10 10:58 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > - "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:29:56PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > Most code is not performance critical.
> >>>
> >>> Much more code than you think
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:34:08AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 08:11 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >
> > People who switch from Fedora because of broken Flash are probably not
> > people we should be most eager to retain.
>
> Good grief man, that's almost everybody who watches the BBC on
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> There is one more reason to revert the change imho: abusing memcpy this
> way is seen more often.
Then those programs must be fixed.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 19.11.10 10:05, Horst H. von Brand (vonbr...@inf.utfsm.cl) wrote:
> Try as I may, for some time now I can't get my machines to poweroff. I've
> got 3 machines affected: A Toshiba Satellite Pro U400, a Samsung N210
> netbook and a white box old dual-core AMD64 (that one has an idiotic BIOS
On 11/19/2010 03:11 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 18.11.2010 16:39, Magnus Glantz napsal(a):
>> It's very important that Fedora doesn't rub upstream the wrong way, but
>> (if it should come to that, or is already happening) is it worth having
>> people change from Fedora to other distributions?
>
> P
On 11/18/2010 01:59 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 17 November 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Ville Skyttä wrote:
I'd get rid of the versioned javadoc dir altogether, and simply install
to %{_javadocdir}/%{name}. Unversioned is goo
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:05:20 -0300 Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Try as I may, for some time now I can't get my machines to poweroff.
The BZ you reported is waiting for info from you:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642347
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> rpm %post and %postun scripts have been added for the following
> important pieces of GNOME3 technology: GSettings, gdk-pixbuf loaders,
> GTK3 modules, and GIO modules:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GS
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:53:21AM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> After yesterday's updates, on login to Gnome a error message shows up
> saying that "CPU Frequency scaling is unsupported", and claims either
> misconfiguration or just isn't supported. It used to word fine before
> that. In /var
Try as I may, for some time now I can't get my machines to poweroff. I've
got 3 machines affected: A Toshiba Satellite Pro U400, a Samsung N210
netbook and a white box old dual-core AMD64 (that one has an idiotic BIOS
that sometimes doesn't shutdown/poweroff properly, but now it is completely
consi
After yesterday's updates, on login to Gnome a error message shows up
saying that "CPU Frequency scaling is unsupported", and claims either
misconfiguration or just isn't supported. It used to word fine before
that. In /var/log/messages nothing shows up.
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU t5...@1.80ghz, s
Compose started at Fri Nov 19 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
bognor-regis-0.6.11-1
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:12:51PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/18/10 10:58 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > - "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:29:56PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > Most code is not performance critical.
> >>>
> >>> Much more code than yo
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:34:08AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 08:11 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Dne 18.11.2010 16:39, Magnus Glantz napsal(a):
> >> It's very important that Fedora doesn't rub upstream the wrong way, but
> >> (if it should come to that, or is already happening) is it
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> thanks for looking at it.
>
>> > However for some of the reports it is only the matter of someone looking
>> > at them as they contain the obvious solution to the problem.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
thanks for looking at it.
> > However for some of the reports it is only the matter of someone looking
> > at them as they contain the obvious solution to the problem.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595165
> > htt
On 11/19/2010 08:11 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 18.11.2010 16:39, Magnus Glantz napsal(a):
>> It's very important that Fedora doesn't rub upstream the wrong way, but
>> (if it should come to that, or is already happening) is it worth having
>> people change from Fedora to other distributions?
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654771
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hello, devel team!
We have a problem with updating translation of Specspo package.
Current maintainer wrote us letter (see below).
Could somebody help up to solve this problem?
Are there people who want to be new maintainer of Specspo package?
Andrew Martynov
Fedora Russian Translation Team
--
Dne 18.11.2010 16:39, Magnus Glantz napsal(a):
> It's very important that Fedora doesn't rub upstream the wrong way, but
> (if it should come to that, or is already happening) is it worth having
> people change from Fedora to other distributions?
People who switch from Fedora because of broken F
54 matches
Mail list logo
