> alex-2.3.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libHSffi-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
:
> ghc-Boolean-0.0.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libHSffi-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
:
:
> ghc-zlib-0.5.2.0-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libHSffi-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
:
> xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libHSffi-ghc6.
On 10-11-07 07:00 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623742 was duped to newer bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624297
>
> The older:
>
> 1-began life with equivalent summary: "system-config-display fails "
>
> 2-contains same comment 0 informa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623742 was duped to newer bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624297
The older:
1-began life with equivalent summary: "system-config-display fails "
2-contains same comment 0 information as the latter
3-was directed to be filed by triager
As you may know, FAmSCo among other things, is responsible for
handling a portion of Fedora's discretionary budget.[0],[1]. We
typically run under-budget, sometimes by a relatively large amount.
FAmSCo recognizes that leaving money on the table every quarter is
effectively a lost opportunity. There
Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 16:41 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 04:52:02PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 14:21 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> > >
> > > Why throw away everything just so we can make input better?
> >
> > Beca
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:20:02PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as
> /usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced
> with a symlink managed by alternatives?
>
If you check the list archives, this has come up
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 17:36, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have read some articles about the Cold Boot Attacks and I am
> wondering whether my Fedora box is protected against such kinds of
> attack, at least to some extent.
Ok there are several different "cold boot attacks". The one I th
On Mon, 01.11.10 20:28, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 07:19:15PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > Any suggestions?
>
> We've encountered some funny things about tmpfs before: It doesn't
> support O_DIRECT at all, for example, necessitating workarounds in
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 18:44:48 +0100,
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:36:58 +0100, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> > I have read some articles about the Cold Boot Attacks and I am
> > wondering whether my Fedora box is protected against such kinds of
> > attack, at least to some extent
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:36:58 +0100, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> I have read some articles about the Cold Boot Attacks and I am
> wondering whether my Fedora box is protected against such kinds of
> attack, at least to some extent.
If you have physical access to the box there is no security left. Att
On 11/06/2010 07:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> First I think you should probably head over to the Wayland mailing list and
>> get involved there. That's something I also recommend to Richard because if
>> you want certai
On 10-11-06 07:36 PM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have read some articles about the Cold Boot Attacks and I am
> wondering whether my Fedora box is protected against such kinds of
> attack, at least to some extent.
>
> I work like an Embedded SW/HW Developer and my experience is that d
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Marius Andreiana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Even when not playing any audio, pulseaudio uses CPU and memory
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 2257 marius 20 0 941m 7524 3188 S 2.9 0.4 14:22.57 chrome
> 2956 marius 20 0 202
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 04:52:02PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 14:21 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
>> >
>> > Why throw away everything just so we can make input better?
>>
>> Because those are just
Dear proventesters,
please add karma to
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgsf-1.14.18-1.fc13
This should be relatively harmless, as there was only one fix in the
upstream code since 1.14.17: fix of writing compressed files.
Julian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
Hi everyone,
I just noticed that Andreas Thienemann seems to be unresponsive:
There are 48 open bugs assigned to him including 3 security bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?resolution=---&emailtype1=exact&query_format=advanced&emailassigned_to1=1&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:00 +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> You mention gnome shell but not nouveau, how do you enable the missing
> 3d support for Nouveau?
There's an Mesa package labelled "experimental" you need to install.
I don't know what the subset of hardware it works for is, but my Quadro
N
Compose started at Sun Nov 7 08:15:34 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
abrt-gui-1.1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit)
alex-2.3.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libHSffi-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
apcupsd-3.14.8-3
Dear proventesters,
please add karma to
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgsf-1.14.18-1.fc13
This should be relatively harmless, as there was only one fix in the
upstream code since 1.14.17: fix of writing compressed files.
Julian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
Hi,
During the F14 release cycle gtk2 was updated from 2.20.x to 2.22.x.
During this change gdk-pixbuf2 was split off into a separate package and
the location of the gdk-pixbuf loaders has changed from:
F13: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/
to
F14: /usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders
This cau
Hi all,
I have read some articles about the Cold Boot Attacks and I am
wondering whether my Fedora box is protected against such kinds of
attack, at least to some extent.
I work like an Embedded SW/HW Developer and my experience is that data
could remain in the dynamic memory for quite long t
Hi,
>> how do you enable the missing 3d support for Nouveau?
>
> It came with mesa-dri-drivers-experimental.
I just wanted to say thanks, I am running with this now, it seems to
be "certainly more than adequate" ;-) to run gnome shell. No more
akmod-nvidia for a while!
-Cam
--
devel mailing lis
Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as
/usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced with a
symlink managed by alternatives?
pgpiqSHAQTCkm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:00 +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> You mention gnome shell but not nouveau, how do you enable the missing
> 3d support for Nouveau? And does it only work for a subset of
> hardware? I'd be interested to try it. Lately I just get:
>
> Accelerated 3D graphics is not available
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 15:48 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > [..] As much as I love Nouveau's freeness, last time I
> > checked I couldn't even run gnome shell on it.
>
> I was doing that back in November[1].
It depends on your hardware. Works on some cards, doesn't on others
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 10:57:27AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We want to ditch extremely useful, ground-breaking features because of
> "tearing" when scrolling in a browser window? [I do *not* see any of
I actually read it as we want to ditch features that were groundbreaking in
1975 since
Hi,
Even when not playing any audio, pulseaudio uses CPU and memory
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
2257 marius20 0 941m 7524 3188 S 2.9 0.4 14:22.57 chrome
2956 marius20 0 2026m 537m 9612 S 2.9 26.8 27:40.42 java
1500 marius20 0 437
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 02:43, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:43AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> >> Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) s
On 11/6/2010 11:28, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> As for the "if all apps are ported to Wayland I will not be able to use
> them remotely anymore" I think this is bogus. Nowadays virtually all
> application aren't X application but gtk/qt applications and the toolkits
> tend to support different b
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> First I think you should probably head over to the Wayland mailing list and
> get involved there. That's something I also recommend to Richard because if
> you want certain features to be present now is a good time to make y
Marek Kasik wrote:
> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.15.1. There are some
> API changes and 1 soname bump of libpoppler.so.8 to libpoppler.so.9.
> API changes mostly involve addition of new functions (see below).
OK, all rebuilds have been done or are still building. 2 notable f
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 04:52:02PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 14:21 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >
> > Why throw away everything just so we can make input better?
>
> Because those are just the examples I know where X11 has been blocking
> progress for *
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:14:57PM +, Pierre Carrier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 13:51, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> >> With virtualization I have more Linux machines than ever (about 50 in
> >> active use at last count). All on my local 1GB network. Consequently
> >> I use X to them and to ot
33 matches
Mail list logo
