Re: Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-11-02 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 07:40:59PM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 13:45 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > I have a viewvc install in F-14, behind mod_python, that keeps > > segfaulting Apache through segfaults > > in /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0. > > Could someone please patch

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-03)

2010-11-02 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (2:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > NOTE: Matthew Garrett, Steven Parrish, Bill Nottingham and Matthias Clasen > are all

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-03)

2010-11-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (2:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. NOTE: Matthew Garrett, Steven Parrish, Bill Nottingham and Matthias Clasen are all unable to attend this week. = Followups = #topic Updates polic

Re: Package review template

2010-11-02 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote: > Thanks to everyone for pointing me scripts and other templates. I will > take a look at them and it will help me figure out a good starting > point. All templates I know are linked here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Categor

Re: Detecting systems booting with GRUB2 in anaconda

2010-11-02 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-11-02 klockan 00:32 +0200 skrev alekc...@googlemail.com: > What can expect user that have system booting with GRUB2 and installing > Fedora? It is natural to expect that after Fedora installation will be > bootable both systems Fedora and other distro. As with all boot loaders it depends

Re: coming libnotify bump

2010-11-02 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:11 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > As far as I can tell, none of the callers to pynotify.init() pass any > named arguments, so nothing should notice the lack of attach=. I only > searched for explicit calls to pynotify.init, if someone's doing like > > foo = pynotify >

Re: coming libnotify bump

2010-11-02 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 11/02/2010 12:13 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 11:33 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >> Matthias, this seems like it will break the python bindings... will you >> be fixing them at the same time? > > I can certainly not do it all by myself. At least not in one day... >

[perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder/f12/master] - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup.

2010-11-02 Thread corsepiu
commit d5ec90a0b056bc76113f1dac1a71bae3e84be5a1 Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Tue Nov 2 17:20:46 2010 +0100 - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup. .gitignore |2 +- perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder.spec | 36 sources

[perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder/f13/master] - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup.

2010-11-02 Thread corsepiu
commit 808bfa97d7a5b7b2e6fc430c408b65ef3e7a5265 Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Tue Nov 2 17:19:27 2010 +0100 - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup. .gitignore |2 +- perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder.spec | 36 sources

[perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder/f14/master] - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup.

2010-11-02 Thread corsepiu
commit 2f52135d7b03449da116fa7351912bbcc4d01295 Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Tue Nov 2 17:18:08 2010 +0100 - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup. .gitignore |2 +- perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder.spec | 36 sources

Re: coming libnotify bump

2010-11-02 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 11:33 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > Matthias, this seems like it will break the python bindings... will you > be fixing them at the same time? I can certainly not do it all by myself. At least not in one day... Looking at notify-python, it seems that running update-def

Re: coming libnotify bump

2010-11-02 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 11:33 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 11/01/2010 09:12 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this > > week; this is going to be a little painful, since there are some api > > changes that will require minor adjus

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Tuesday 02 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging guidelines. We > would welcome wider discussion/comments at this point. From our point of > view guidelines seem ready for approval by FPC. > > You can see current version of draft he

[perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder] - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup.

2010-11-02 Thread corsepiu
commit c032cfe33fb962cfa86cc877192fde7cf843ad30 Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Tue Nov 2 17:07:40 2010 +0100 - Upstream update. - Spec cleanup. .gitignore |2 +- perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder.spec | 36 sources

File DBIx-SearchBuilder-1.58.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by corsepiu

2010-11-02 Thread corsepiu
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder: e81e934b4b7bf11667c405dbe2bb440e DBIx-SearchBuilder-1.58.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 11/02/2010 04:10 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: > > SO> Recently? I haven't heard of Java-specific guideline changes for > SO> past few months. Care to enlighten me? > > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/13 > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pi

Re: coming libnotify bump

2010-11-02 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 11/01/2010 09:12 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this > week; this is going to be a little painful, since there are some api > changes that will require minor adjustment of all users. And there's > quite a few of them (see below). I w

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: SO> Recently? I haven't heard of Java-specific guideline changes for SO> past few months. Care to enlighten me? https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/13 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2010-October/000699.html - J< -- devel ma

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 11/02/2010 03:30 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: > > SO> Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging > SO> guidelines. > > It's terribly rude to crosspost to a list which simply rejects messages > from non-subscribers. I'll make sure no

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 11/02/2010 03:27 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: > > SO> Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging > SO> guidelines. We would welcome wider discussion/comments at this > SO> point. From our point of view guidelines seem ready for approv

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: SO> Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging SO> guidelines. It's terribly rude to crosspost to a list which simply rejects messages from non-subscribers. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: SO> Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging SO> guidelines. We would welcome wider discussion/comments at this SO> point. From our point of view guidelines seem ready for approval by SO> FPC. Could we get a diff of these guidelines again

[perl-DateTime-Format-Natural/f13/master] update to 0.91

2010-11-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 4ffe7f0... update to 0.91 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

[perl-DateTime-Format-Natural/f14/master] update to 0.91

2010-11-02 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 4ffe7f0... update to 0.91 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

2010-11-02 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging guidelines. We would welcome wider discussion/comments at this point. From our point of view guidelines seem ready for approval by FPC. You can see current version of draft here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraf

[perl-DateTime-Format-Natural] update to 0.91

2010-11-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 4ffe7f04ba289558292144d473d1ca5937075870 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Tue Nov 2 15:10:17 2010 +0100 update to 0.91 .gitignore|1 + perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+),

Re: rawhide report: 20101102 changes

2010-11-02 Thread Mat Booth
On 2 November 2010 09:34, Rawhide Report wrote: > > openscada-0.7.0-2.fc15 > -- > * Tue Oct 26 2010 Aleksey Popkov - 0.7.0-2 > - Build the 0.7.0 version. > > * Wed Oct 13 2010 Aleksey Popkov - 0.7.0-2 > - Adding the module to self package of PostgreSQL servers. > - Build the

[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Update to 1.34

2010-11-02 Thread Paul Howarth
commit eefbde615fd84e8998257924b4b5b9b3e2f70b40 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Tue Nov 2 13:09:38 2010 + Update to 1.34 - New upstream release 1.34: - schema http for certificate verification changed to wildcards_in_cn=1 - if upgrading socket from inet to ssl fails due

[perl-Clipboard] update to 0.13

2010-11-02 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 9b38e7d6b0549741c72881a2e5432269764ea59e Author: Iain Arnell Date: Tue Nov 2 14:08:23 2010 +0100 update to 0.13 .gitignore |1 + perl-Clipboard.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignor

Re: Package review template

2010-11-02 Thread Jean-Francois Saucier
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > What we did is we have references[1]. They seem to work fairly well and > they are not too noisy IMO. YMMV of course. Yes, maybe that would do the trick if there are not too many references in the template. I will try to work something

Re: Package review template

2010-11-02 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 11/02/2010 01:35 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky >> wrote: >> I'd like to see links to packaging guidelines for each point (or at >> least for non-obvious ones). It's helpful for the both parties to know >> why they have to fix things.

Re: Package review template

2010-11-02 Thread Jean-Francois Saucier
Thanks to everyone for pointing me scripts and other templates. I will take a look at them and it will help me figure out a good starting point. > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky > wrote: > I'd like to see links to packaging guidelines for each point (or at > least for non

Re: RemoveSETUID feature

2010-11-02 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2010 04:31 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Yeah, it looks like the capabilities thing has broken my buildsystem: > > Error unpacking rpm package iputils-20101006-2.fc15.x86_64 > error: unpacking of archive failed on file /bin/ping: cpio: ca

Directory unowned.

2010-11-02 Thread Dmitrij S . Kryzhevich
Hi! %{_libdir}/girepositry-1.0/ is not owned by any package. It is used, i.e., in DeviceKit-power-devel. Dmitrij. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Heads up: podofo soname bump in rawhide

2010-11-02 Thread Dan Horák
Hello, I'm going update podofo to 0.8.4 in rawhide, it comes with a new soname and that means all dependent packages needs to be rebuilt. They are scribus (mine) calibre fontmatrix I will take care of the rebuilds. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

rawhide report: 20101102 changes

2010-11-02 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Nov 2 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit) apcupsd-3.14.8-3.

Re: Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-11-02 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 13:45 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > I have a viewvc install in F-14, behind mod_python, that keeps > segfaulting Apache through segfaults > in /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0. Could someone please patch and rebuild mod_python for F-14. It's all here: https://bugzilla.redhat.c