Re: Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-10-30 Thread Bojan Smojver
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes: > Possibly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c gi?id=640432 ? Thanks. I thought I was going crazy for a sec there. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-10-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:45:29 +1100 Bojan Smojver wrote: > Just before I open a bug report, is this happening to anyone else? I > have a viewvc install in F-14, behind mod_python, that keeps > segfaulting Apache through segfaults > in /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0. Possibly https://bugzilla.redh

The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken (was: Re: Heads Up - New Firefox update)

2010-10-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Martin Stransky wrote: > there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to > stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it > fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability > (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607222). Looks like the F13 build g

Re: Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-30 Thread Dominic Hopf
Am Samstag, den 30.10.2010, 21:51 -0400 schrieb Eric "Sparks" Christensen: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 21:32, R P Herrold wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > > > >> I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light > >> Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is

Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-10-30 Thread Bojan Smojver
Just before I open a bug report, is this happening to anyone else? I have a viewvc install in F-14, behind mod_python, that keeps segfaulting Apache through segfaults in /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-30 Thread Eric "Sparks" Christensen
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 21:32, R P Herrold wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > >> I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light >> Tool Kit (FLTK).  The source is a single file with no readme and I'm >> not exactly sure how to package the software

Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-30 Thread R P Herrold
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light > Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm > not exactly sure how to package the software. Has anyone worked with > FLTK that might be able to he

Re: Default partitioning

2010-10-30 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:03 -0800, Javier Prats wrote: > Where is this info kept on the install image and how would I go about > modifying it locally to start playing? I'd like to learn whether some > one else does this or not. It's in anaconda. The / and /home specifications are here (line numb

Re: Default partitioning

2010-10-30 Thread Javier Prats
In my opinion I think it WOULD be a good idea to add a warning or make that the default behavior. I reinstalled due to this and I'm sure others have had to as well. If someone could point me to the right direction I could work on it. There are some questions since I'm new to this. Is someone al

Re: Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 17:05 -0400, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light > Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm > not exactly sure how to package the software. Has anyone worked with > FLTK that might

Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-30 Thread Eric "Sparks" Christensen
I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm not exactly sure how to package the software. Has anyone worked with FLTK that might be able to help me with this? Thanks, Eric -- devel mailing list devel@lis

Re: rawhide report: 20101030 changes

2010-10-30 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:11:17PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:57:59 +0200, Tomasz wrote: > > > Could you point us to review of LibreOffice package? According to > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144107.html > > you need full process for

Re: rawhide report: 20101030 changes

2010-10-30 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:57:59 +0200, Tomasz wrote: > Could you point us to review of LibreOffice package? According to > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144107.html > you need full process for new package when changing upstream. See %changelog. -> http://bugzilla.re

Re: rawhide report: 20101030 changes

2010-10-30 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 08:50:55PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:27 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > Will the corresponding Obsoletes/Provides be added to the libreoffice > > subpackages, or do we need to modify our Requires? > > The libreoffice subpackages have the corr

Re: rawhide report: 20101030 changes

2010-10-30 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:27 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Will the corresponding Obsoletes/Provides be added to the libreoffice > subpackages, or do we need to modify our Requires? The libreoffice subpackages have the corresponding Obsoletes. Provides are not there, mostly because they'd generall

Re: rawhide report: 20101030 changes

2010-10-30 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: > Compose started at Sat Oct 30 08:15:03 UTC 2010 > > Broken deps for x86_64 > -- >        bibus-1.5.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requires openoffice.org-writer >        bibus-1.5.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requi

Re: root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree

2010-10-30 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:19:45 +0300, Jussi wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:14:43 -0400 > Neal Becker wrote: > > I have no idea what these messages I've received mean: > > > > root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > On x86_64: > > root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires >

Re: root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree

2010-10-30 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:14:43 -0400 Neal Becker wrote: > I have no idea what these messages I've received mean: > > root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires > libunuran.so.14()(64bit) On i386: > root-unuran-5.26.00

root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree

2010-10-30 Thread Neal Becker
I have no idea what these messages I've received mean: root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libunuran.so.14()(64bit) On i386: root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.i686 requires libunuran.so.14 Please resolve this as soon as

Re: rawhide report: 20101030 changes

2010-10-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:27:16AM +, Rawhide Report wrote: > collectd-snmp-4.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit) I just started a new build, should be fixed tomorrow. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df list

Re: -frecord-gcc-switches as default CFLAG?

2010-10-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:24:02AM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > I noticed on my Fedora 13 box that in the RPM macro %__global_cflags > that -frecord-gcc-switches is missing, which is a nifty compiler > feature that will record the flags passed to gcc in a section in the > object file, thus aiding in

rawhide report: 20101030 changes

2010-10-30 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Oct 30 08:15:03 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit) apcupsd-3.14.8-3.