Absolutely. I apologise if you took offence Toshi. My rant was in by no
means directed at you, but the subject at hand. Reading back it looks
like I have targeted you unfairly - not my intention.
On 10/07/2010 02:51 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Uh. I'm talking purely about bundled libs here w
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:00:50PM +1000, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 12:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > But I agree that having a strict requirement because it's felt that the
> > issues that are raised by allowing the requirement to be violated are very
> > problematic for us as a dist
On 10/07/2010 12:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> But I agree that having a strict requirement because it's felt that the
> issues that are raised by allowing the requirement to be violated are very
> problematic for us as a distro but then letting certain things bundle
> because they're more import
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 04:55:46PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> I give +1 to this. On the other hand Fedora also is (was?) a project
> where individual package maintainers had the biggest influence on what
> packages ship if they do not cross some fundamental legal limits. This
> changed in many ways
On 10/06/2010 11:26 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> 6) Compatibility Mode
>
> The current static firewall model will still be available for
> compatibility for users or administrators creating their own firewall.
> This deactivates the firewall service and also the D-BUS daemon.
>
> ---
>
> C
On 6 October 2010 23:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
> This isn't generally how we do things. We encourage people to mark bugs
> as blockers; this constitutes *nominating* the bug as a blocker, it
> makes it pop up for review at a blocker review meeting. We then usually
> determine whether or not the
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 18:05 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:53 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> > > --If you are the OWNER of one of these bugs, PLEASE add a comment to the
> > > bug letting us know how things are goi
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 18:05 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:53 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> > --If you are the OWNER of one of these bugs, PLEASE add a comment to the
> > bug letting us know how things are going and what you are planning to do
> > next. I
>
> > 639730 ::
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:53 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> --If you are the OWNER of one of these bugs, PLEASE add a comment to the
> bug letting us know how things are going and what you are planning to do
> next. I
> 639730 :: MODIFIED :: empathy :: bdpep...@gmail.com :: Empathy fails to
> co
When: Friday, 2010-10-08 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the final release of Fedora
14. We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the
criteria, should stay on the list, and are getting the attent
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 23:32 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> What's the worst thing that can happen when trusting the ACPI lid state?
>
> Think about this:
>
> - Laptop lid open (so internal lvds enabled), and also external monitor
> connected.
> - lid state is wrong at boot, so it says lid clos
There's 2 more Guidelines that were approved in past meetings that have just
been written up.
= Directory ownership update =
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/5
6 +1 votes , no 0 votes, and no -1 votes
This update makes it clearer that packages like gtk-doc do not need to be
required simply to
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 09:57 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 08:54 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
> > 2. The combination of the Mozilla Trademark issue combined with the
> > strict handling of patches by (corporate|distro)-maintainers (I don't
> > think that this is a RH/Fedora issue -
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:33:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:03 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:28:43AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:20 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:32A
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Seems quite complex. What's wrong with a directory:
>
> /etc/iptables.d/
>
> where RPMs like libvirt just drop the required additional rules (in a
> separate chain if you like) and restart the iptables service? It's
> low-tech but simple and it's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640752
James Laska changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640752
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On 10/06/2010 08:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Seems quite complex. What's wrong with a directory:
>
>/etc/iptables.d/
>
> where RPMs like libvirt just drop the required additional rules (in a
> separate chain if you like) and restart the iptables service? It's
> low-tech but simple and
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:03 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:28:43AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:20 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > > don't we already have defa
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
> Of course. But there's in fact no disagreement, only looking at
> different aspects of the same thing.
>
> Why do you think the copying takes place? Because the companies have
> built a good reputation and brand, allowing them to incr
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:58 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> Adam Williamson said the following on 10/06/2010 01:32 PM Pacific Time:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
> >> tracking system during the F14
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:31:54PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:20 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >> > don't we already have default beh
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:28:43AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:20 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > don't we already have default behaviours based on the lid switch,
> > > anyway? So why don't w
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:53:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:35 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 5 October 2010 05:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > Are we really stuck with gdm/kdm/lxdm/...dm
> > > implementing it?
> >
> > No, I think what we need to do is to tea
Adam Williamson said the following on 10/06/2010 01:32 PM Pacific Time:
> On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
>> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
>> In a quick burst of a
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 06:29:21PM -0600, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
> On 05/10/10 08:40 AM, FlorianFesti wrote:
> > On 10/05/2010 03:15 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> If the lid is open, both output should be enabled by default (you are
> >> free to manually disable one). If the lid is clo
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:20:55 +0200
Harald Hoyer wrote:
> here we go:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dracut-005-5.fc13
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dracut-005-5.fc12
>
> Patches are here:
>
> short URL: http://goo.gl/23Bu
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=dr
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:29:32 -0400
Brandon Lozza wrote:
...snip many tons of lines...
Can you please trim your replies?
> Interesting, from the meeting we can tell
>
> 1) A number of people want to give Mozilla an exception.
>
> 2) BRANDING is an issue, like I said in another thread. Which is
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:19:08 +0200
Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:14:28 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:45:11 +0200
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok - that's one problem - we sucks in selective updates and
> > > information for users.
> > >
> > > Oth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640752
--- Comment #1 from James Laska 2010-10-06 14:37:31 EDT ---
Sorry, typo, that was supposed to be ...
package: perl-Test-Simple
At todays FPC meeting, the FPC approved several guideline changes.
= Rationale for Conflicts Guideline =
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/18
6 +1, no 0, no -1.
This was purely informational and requires no changes to how you package
= Appropriate Content in Changelogs =
https://fedorahosted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Broken dependencies found with perl-Test-Simple-0.94-2.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640752
Summary: Broken dependencies found with
Seems quite complex. What's wrong with a directory:
/etc/iptables.d/
where RPMs like libvirt just drop the required additional rules (in a
separate chain if you like) and restart the iptables service? It's
low-tech but simple and it's all that libvirt needs.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtual
W dniu 6 października 2010 15:42 użytkownik Eric Sandeen
napisał:
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> W dniu 6 października 2010 05:01 użytkownik Eric Sandeen
>> napisał:
>
> ...
>
>>> cool! I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just
>>> build your own e2fsprogs to get it ...
>>
>> I a
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 02:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> OK gang, it's in e2fsprogs-1.41.12-6.fc15
>>
>> you have to invoke it with "-test" options to make it go ;)
>>
>> Word of warning, it's not had a lot of attention, and the whole
>> design could change in the future, but it'
On 10/06/2010 02:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> OK gang, it's in e2fsprogs-1.41.12-6.fc15
>
> you have to invoke it with "-test" options to make it go ;)
>
> Word of warning, it's not had a lot of attention, and the whole
> design could change in the future, but it's something to play with :)
>
> -
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 06/10/10 16:31, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm being a bit too paranoid but it is your data after all :)
>>
>
> I just use Rawhide for testing,
> so a little reinstall keeps you in practice :D
>
OK gang, it's in e2fsprogs-1.41.12-6.fc15
you have to invoke it with "
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> It's really pretty simple: we can only define goals and values and
> blahblah for 'the Fedora project' as long as we actually retain control
> over 'the Fedora project' (that's we as in the Fedora community, not Red
> Hat, BTW) and we can only do that if we c
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:25:27 -0500,
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
> > Some have
> > also hoped that Mozilla would change with regard to bundled libraries in the
> > near future, but that seems pretty unlikely.
>
> I think that's an unfair statement; from what
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557485
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Summary of changes:
c7aa7fc... update to 0.16 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
> In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a
> bunch of proposed new wiki p
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
> Some have
> also hoped that Mozilla would change with regard to bundled libraries in the
> near future, but that seems pretty unlikely.
I think that's an unfair statement; from what I understand, Firefox has
already unbundled some libraries, and said they
On 10/06/2010 01:17 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:54:41PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure docking stations are irrelevant to this whole thread.
>> The issue is about lids and video outputs. If you think lids are all
>> over the place (as mjg59 points out)
On 10/06/2010 05:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) said:
>>> But I cannot list all the RHEL6 bugs.
>>
>> Why not? Strip partner names if necessary, but please make it possible
>> for people to decide whether a given update is a benefit to them.
>
> Well, he could
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:54:41PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> I'm pretty sure docking stations are irrelevant to this whole thread.
> The issue is about lids and video outputs. If you think lids are all
> over the place (as mjg59 points out), docks are even worse. Lets not
> drag them in
On 10/06/2010 12:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:22:44AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
>> Well, I guess some people would want the laptop to suspend, but it's a
>> very good question. Now all it needs is someone willing and able to
>> write a little patch for me :-)
>
> Do y
On 10/06/2010 12:41 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:29:59 -0400,
> Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>
>> The only possible room for debate that I see is that there is, in
>> Firefox, a potential conflict between our "ship upstream" and "don't
>> bundle libs" values. We have FE
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:22:44AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Well, I guess some people would want the laptop to suspend, but it's a
> very good question. Now all it needs is someone willing and able to
> write a little patch for me :-)
Do you know which components need patching to make Fedor
On 10/05/2010 09:48 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 02:35 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 5 October 2010 05:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Are we really stuck with gdm/kdm/lxdm/...dm
>>> implementing it?
>>
>> No, I think what we need to do is to teach GPM how to turn off the
>> intern
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:29:59 -0400,
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>
> The only possible room for debate that I see is that there is, in
> Firefox, a potential conflict between our "ship upstream" and "don't
> bundle libs" values. We have FESco to sort that out.
Those are the policies I was re
On 10/06/2010 12:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 10:59:08 -0400,
> Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>
>> I have an idea... I'm going to create a fork of Fedora. I'm going to
>> fill it full of proprietary shit. I'm going to find the buggiest closed
>> drivers I can find and l
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 10:59:08 -0400,
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>
> I have an idea... I'm going to create a fork of Fedora. I'm going to
> fill it full of proprietary shit. I'm going to find the buggiest closed
> drivers I can find and load them into the kernel. I'll also make it so
> that
Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) said:
> > But I cannot list all the RHEL6 bugs.
>
> Why not? Strip partner names if necessary, but please make it possible
> for people to decide whether a given update is a benefit to them.
Well, he could list them in the bug field, but bodhi would elide
t
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> However, this here is Fedora, a project that once was aiming at
> "Freedom" - As trivial as it is, restrictive trademark policies simply
> do not fit into this philosophy.
If we don't protect the Fedora trademark, anyone can produce any
On 06/10/10 16:31, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>
> Maybe I'm being a bit too paranoid but it is your data after all :)
>
I just use Rawhide for testing,
so a little reinstall keeps you in practice :D
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
On 06/10/10 16:29, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Cool if you turn it on in rawhide. Helps those of us who are build
> challenged :-). I can test in raid and LV environments.
>
> Regards,
> OldFart
Likewise, if basic instruction provided.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 11:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> cool! I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just
>> build your own e2fsprogs to get it ...
>>
>> -Eric
>>
>
>
> Cool if you turn it on in rawhide. Helps those of us who are build
> challenged :-). I ca
On 10/05/2010 11:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> cool! I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just
> build your own e2fsprogs to get it ...
>
> -Eric
>
Cool if you turn it on in rawhide. Helps those of us who are build
challenged :-). I can test in raid and LV environments.
Re
I am currently working on a proof of concept implementation of a
firewall daemon, that will support dynamic firewall management with a
D-BUS interface.
This implementation should be usable in some days and will feature the
transition of the current firewall model to the dynamic version. It will
Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen said:
> Some things to test would be attempting to defrag files
> which are being actively written to / read from in various
> ways - concurrent access, mmap, etc.
Also make sure to test files used by sendfile() and splice()/vmsplice().
--
Chris Adams
Systems and
On 10/06/2010 10:41 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 04:08 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:26:59 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 10/06/2010 02:49 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Nonsense, trademarks exists to protect users and to avoid living off
somebody else brand
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 04:08 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:26:59 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 10/06/2010 02:49 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >>> Nonsense, trademarks exists to protect users and to avoid living off
> >>> some
On 10/06/2010 04:08 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:26:59 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 10/06/2010 02:49 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>>> Nonsense, trademarks exists to protect users and to avoid living off
>>> somebody else brand recognition.
>>
>> I disagree - trademarks exist to
On 10/06/2010 10:08 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> On 10/6/10, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> I won't comment on the trademark issue (because that's just pure lunacy),
>> but let me comment here "they don't accept my patches, so they are non-
>> free". That's just nonsense ...
>
> Yes it is, that's not the iss
* Brandon Lozza [06/10/2010 16:28] :
>
> Yes it is, that's not the issue. They aren't letting us distribute it
> ourselves, unless its brand is removed or we don't make those changes.
It's their brand, they get to decide what they do (or let you do) with it.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel
Hi,
A couple of days back I uploaded preview 8 of mono-2.8 for comments but
have heard nothing back. The move to 2.8 will require a good number of
rebuilds as 2.8 has had all the .NET 1.1 stuff removed.
If you have a mono reliant package, can you please rebuild and let me
know if there are any pr
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:26:59 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 02:49 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Nonsense, trademarks exists to protect users and to avoid living off
> > somebody else brand recognition.
>
> I disagree - trademarks exist to protect the manufacturer from
> loosing profits be
On 10/6/10, Matej Cepl wrote:
> I won't comment on the trademark issue (because that's just pure lunacy),
> but let me comment here "they don't accept my patches, so they are non-
> free". That's just nonsense ...
Yes it is, that's not the issue. They aren't letting us distribute it
ourselves, un
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 6 października 2010 05:01 użytkownik Eric Sandeen
> napisał:
...
>> cool! I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just
>> build your own e2fsprogs to get it ...
>
> I already built my own version.
Ok, let me know if you can break anything! :)
(
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:29:32 -0400,
Brandon Lozza wrote:
>
> Interesting, from the meeting we can tell
>
> 1) A number of people want to give Mozilla an exception.
>
> 2) BRANDING is an issue, like I said in another thread. Which is why
> people are against removing it.
People have claim
On 10/06/2010 02:49 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius, Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:01:09 +0200:
>> Close source school of thinking - Trademarks exist to protect an
>> enterprise's product and to close out "copyiers". FLOSS exists to enable
>> people "to share".
>
> Nonsense, trademarks exists to prote
Compose started at Wed Oct 6 08:15:24 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
bluefish-2.0.2-1.fc15.1.x86_64 requires libgucharmap.so.7()(64bit)
clutter-gst-de
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 02:46:28PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> But I cannot list all the RHEL6 bugs.
Why not? Strip partner names if necessary, but please make it possible
for people to decide whether a given update is a benefit to them.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel maili
Ralf Corsepius, Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:01:09 +0200:
> Close source school of thinking - Trademarks exist to protect an
> enterprise's product and to close out "copyiers". FLOSS exists to enable
> people "to share".
Nonsense, trademarks exists to protect users and to avoid living off
somebody else br
On 10/05/2010 11:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ===
> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-10-05)
> ===
...
> 19:59:38 some examples: dracut was updated in f12/13 with a bunch of
> patches. Were those all bugfixes?
> 19:59:59 if it's hard to t
Florent Le Coz, Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:20:04 +0200:
>> Trademark cannot be ever free as in freedom.
> That's why Fedora should not ship Firefox, but Iceweasel, or Icecat, or
> Minefield, or anything else that is not trademarked and isn't impossible
> to patch without mozilla's consent.
I won't comme
On 10/5/10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ===
> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-10-05)
> ===
>
> Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-10-05/fesco.2010-10-0
On 10/06/2010 08:06 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> If yes, from a quick glance, it seems jackbeat uses an allowed licence
> (GPL) and doesn't require any supporting libs that are not ditributable
> by Fedora, so I think the only reason it's not in the repo is nobody
> packaged it yet. Feel free to
On 10/06/2010 11:55 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
> Is there a reason why this is not included in the repositories? If not
> I'd be happy to submit it and take it on.
>
> regards,
>
> Brendan
>
>
Is it this software you are talking about ? http://jackbeat.samalyse.org/
If yes, from a quick glance,
Is there a reason why this is not included in the repositories? If not
I'd be happy to submit it and take it on.
regards,
Brendan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed
-
even if i try to remove .fedora.cert and fedora-packager-setup (so it's
not a certi
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:27 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> PPS I did not modify my bump script yet to attempt a commit to master
> and merge to the f14 branch. In the interest of time, I took the easy
> route and just did commits to the f14 branch. Maintainers can do a
> merge and fixup after the
> PPS I did not modify my bump script yet to attempt a commit to master
> and merge to the f14 branch. In the interest of time, I took the easy
> route and just did commits to the f14 branch. Maintainers can do a
> merge and fixup after the builds have been done if they wish to have
> their bran
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a
> gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and
> Fedora 15. Items built with this could have
85 matches
Mail list logo
