It's been creeping up, and now it's time: the world-famous Graphics Test
Week begins tomorrow (2010-09-28), with the Nouveau Test Day [1]. As
always, the event runs all day in #fedora-test-day on Freenode IRC. To
complete Graphics Test Week, the Radeon Test Day [2] takes place the
following day, We
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package
review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 26th Sept were
Parag AN(पराग), Peter Lemenkov and Martin Gieseking.
Parag AN(पराग) : 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635654
perl-Text-Hunspell
Hello there,
I'm having the following error with some of my packages (iverilog and
perl-Verilog-Perl) since last week, even after updating my certs.
$ fedpkg import
/home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/iverilog-0.9.20100928-1.el6.src.rpm
Uploading: d004408ea595b13780c4c036f8188b66 verilog-0.9.3.tar.gz
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:22 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > In practice this is a formalization of existing procedure - until F14
> > Beta, QA and releng did much the same process but entirely informally,
> > we just kept lists of bugs we'd take fixes for either in our heads or in
> > the RC creatio
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 15:12 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:48, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >> The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
> >> continue to promote i686 installs ov
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 23:35:43 +0200,
drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 23:00:45 +0200,
> > drago01 wrote:
> >>
> >> The x86_64 vs. i686 thing aside ... IMO the CD size limit does more
> >> harm than good and should have be
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 23:00:45 +0200,
> drago01 wrote:
>>
>> The x86_64 vs. i686 thing aside ... IMO the CD size limit does more
>> harm than good and should have been lifted a while ago.
>
> The CD size limit is self imposed by the Sp
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 23:00:45 +0200,
drago01 wrote:
>
> The x86_64 vs. i686 thing aside ... IMO the CD size limit does more
> harm than good and should have been lifted a while ago.
The CD size limit is self imposed by the Spins that choose to do so.
The 4 GiB size limit is a Spins SIG rul
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I would expect that the i686 install will remain the most common so
> long as that is what the Fedora project promotes.
I wouldn't. We can actually look a little deeper at some of the
download stats and take the concept of "promotion" out
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 22:15:48 +0200,
> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:58:26 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 21:50:21 +0200, Jan Kratochvil
>> > wrote:
>> > > F14+ livecd-tools have now /us
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 22:15:48 +0200,
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:58:26 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 21:50:21 +0200, Jan Kratochvil
> > wrote:
> > > F14+ livecd-tools have now /usr/bin/mkbiarch for live images automatically
> > > choosing x86_6
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> ==
On 09/27/2010 09:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
>
> Right— it's clear that i686 is far more commonly installed today but a
> non-trivial part of that must be due to the fact that the x86_64 links
> are hidden. The smolt cpu stats (mhz, number of cores, vendors)
> suggests that a significant port
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
package: perl-HTML-FormFu-0.07
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic Updates policy
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> FWIW, we have two measurements of x86_64 vs i686.
>
> Smolt:
> 65% i686
> 35% x86_64
>
> mirrors.fedoraproject.org:
> 70% i686
> 30% x86_64
Right— it's clear that i686 is far more commonly installed today but a
no
Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
> > The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
> > continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
> > only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
> >
> > When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64
On 27 September 2010 21:04, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unless this change was made in f14. That is not acceptable for f14 at this
> stage.
I'm using dist-f14.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:58:26 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 21:50:21 +0200, Jan Kratochvil
> wrote:
> > F14+ livecd-tools have now /usr/bin/mkbiarch for live images automatically
> > choosing x86_64/i686. I was told it is too late for F14 biarch spin but for
> > F15+ tha
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
> On 27 September 2010 19:58, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > The character class must be inside bracketed expression, thus double
> > brackets, please see man grep. The new grep-2.7 checks for this common
> > fault:
>
> Right, but you could argue it's a
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
> continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
> only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
>
> When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
"Jesse Keating" wrote:
>
>
>"Richard Hughes" wrote:
>
>>On 27 September 2010 19:58, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>>> The character class must be inside bracketed expression, thus double
>>> brackets, please see man grep. The new grep-2.7 checks for this common
>>> fault:
>>
>>Right, but you cou
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 27/09/10 20:12, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
>>
>> If you're not swapping x86_64 bringing increased performance is easily
>> demonstrated, and has been previously demonstrated here... if there is
>> any doubt on this point I'd be glad to run s
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 21:50:21 +0200,
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:53:09 +0200, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:48 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > > When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
> > > preferred option on the relevant hardware?
commit 9fe003849d49c84494ea75baf1dbac037cb0ad2d
Merge: d170ecc 8274a33
Author: Xavier Bachelot
Date: Mon Sep 27 21:55:04 2010 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el6
perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:53:09 +0200, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:48 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
> > preferred option on the relevant hardware?
>
> i686 will run on x86_64 and i686 machines and on the overwhelming
>
"Richard Hughes" wrote:
>On 27 September 2010 19:58, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>> The character class must be inside bracketed expression, thus double
>> brackets, please see man grep. The new grep-2.7 checks for this common fault:
>
>Right, but you could argue it's a regression as the behavio
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 15:12, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:48, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>>> The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
>>> continue to promote i686 installs over x86
On 27 September 2010 19:58, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> The character class must be inside bracketed expression, thus double
> brackets, please see man grep. The new grep-2.7 checks for this common fault:
Right, but you could argue it's a regression as the behavior changed.
Could somebody please
On 27/09/10 20:12, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> If you're not swapping x86_64 bringing increased performance is easily
> demonstrated, and has been previously demonstrated here... if there is
> any doubt on this point I'd be glad to run some more benchmarks to
> demonstrate it.
For me inept brain.
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:45 AM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:30, Tom London wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, darrell pfeifer
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:55, Owen Taylor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 14:04 -0400, Owen Ta
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:48, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
>> continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
>> only a third of fedora users are
> All three of my newly released GNOME 2.32.0 projects failed to build
> on koji (f14) today:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2491737&name=build.log
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2491754&name=build.log
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:15:46PM +0200, Lorenzo Villani wrote:
> [1] attica -- Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API
> [2] automoc -- Automatic moc for Qt 4
> [3] bip -- IRC Bouncer
Adopted bip.
> [4] kbluetooth -- The KDE Bluetooth Framework
> [5] kdebluetooth -- The KDE Blueto
2010/9/27 Athmane Madjoudj :
> On 09/27/2010 06:53 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>>
>> i686 will run on x86_64 and i686 machines and on the overwhelming
>> majority of hw someone will happen to have.
>>
>> x86_64 will not.
>>
>> until i686 is uncommon (which is still not yet) I think we should keep
>> the
[1] attica -- Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API
[2] automoc -- Automatic moc for Qt 4
[3] bip -- IRC Bouncer
[4] kbluetooth -- The KDE Bluetooth Framework
[5] kdebluetooth -- The KDE Bluetooth Framework
[6] shared-desktop-ontologies -- Shared ontologies needed for semantic
envi
On 09/27/2010 06:53 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>
> i686 will run on x86_64 and i686 machines and on the overwhelming
> majority of hw someone will happen to have.
>
> x86_64 will not.
>
> until i686 is uncommon (which is still not yet) I think we should keep
> the default i686.
>
Most (if not all) Atom
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:48, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
> continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
> only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
>
> When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:48 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
> continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
> only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
>
> When will the Fedora project begin recommending
The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
preferred option on the relevant hardware?
--
devel m
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:51 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> It's not "some random day" - it's when you actually accept an update!
> It's not easy to estimate impact of update - but banning completely
> is not a solution neither.
Well, most people either:
a) apply all updates as they come and
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:26:46 -0400
Brandon Lozza wrote:
> I can't tell people Fedora is the best if it's not carrying the latest
> upstream KDE, its just not possible. I'm constantly recruiting new
> users. I'm in regular contact with the team of people who run
> Techrights.
I would personally s
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:30:31 -0400
"Horst H. von Brand" wrote:
> Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> > As of yesterday there simply is no way to get WiFi (iwlagn here) to
> > work. Restarting NetworkManager, avahi-daemon, udevd, dbus has no
> > effect. Restrarting nm-applet does nothing, no response to
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> As of yesterday there simply is no way to get WiFi (iwlagn here) to
> work. Restarting NetworkManager, avahi-daemon, udevd, dbus has no
> effect. Restrarting nm-applet does nothing, no response to iwconfig ow iw.
>
> The configuration for the wired network (set up stat
Monday, October 4, is the wiki freeze for the GA release notes. If
there is something you want to see in the release notes now is your last
chance.
The release notes draft content can be found at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Beats
This page links to a wiki page for each area in t
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 22:26, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> I can't tell people Fedora is the best if it's not carrying the latest
> upstream KDE, its just not possible. I'm constantly recruiting new
> users. I'm in regular contact with the team of people who run
> Techrights.
>
... lots cut out ...
Br
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> It's not "some random day" - it's when you actually accept an update! It's
> not
> easy to estimate impact of update - but banning completely is not a solution
> neither.
We do not give nearly enough information in our updates for the user to
make a
> What does matter to Fedora is having an updates policy that is
> designed to minimize disruption to users during a release is pointless
> if a significant part of Fedora - KDE - is going to be allowed to
> ignore the updates policy and deliberately introduce visible to the
> user changes in the m
All three of my newly released GNOME 2.32.0 projects failed to build
on koji (f14) today:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2491737&name=build.log
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2491754&name=build.log
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2491800&name
Ok, I made some screen shots. It's a bit easier to understand if you
see it actually working. They should still give you a idea.
Looking at the PackageDB tags, filtering for the "Office" and "Qt" tags:
http://fedorapeople.org/~ffesti/screenshots/PackageDBTags.gif
Filtering for the "GNOME" menu
Compose started at Mon Sep 27 13:15:27 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires
libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit)
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 15:13 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:48:34AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > Say you ship with 50 bugs in a package. As you update it through the
> > lifetime of a release, that number should decrease more or less
> > monotonically. The bugs that take
2010/9/27 Phil Knirsch :
> Hi everyone!
>
> The Fedora s390x team[1] is happy to announce the first installable
> Fedora on IBM System Z (aka s390x) since Fedora 6!
Awesome!
/me still hopes that he'll see Fedora-PPC for F-14 :)
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@
Start End Name
Tue 28-Sep Tue 28-Sep Beta Release Public Availability
Fri 01-Oct Fri 01-Oct Final Blocker Meeting (f14blocker) #2
Fri 08-Oct Fri 08-Oct Final Blocker Meeting (f14blocker) #3
Mon 11-Oct Mon 11-Oct Submit Installer Builds for Final TC Compose
Mon 11-Oct Fri 15-O
Now plz send me a Z series and I'll take care about the updates :-P
-of
Phil Knirsch schrieb:
>Hi everyone!
>
>The Fedora s390x team[1] is happy to announce the first installable
>Fedora on IBM System Z (aka s390x) since Fedora 6!
>
>It's been a long time in the making, but after several Fedor
Hi everyone!
The Fedora s390x team[1] is happy to announce the first installable
Fedora on IBM System Z (aka s390x) since Fedora 6!
It's been a long time in the making, but after several Fedora releases
since we started getting everything up into shape again we've finally
reached a point where
Hello, all.
I have got next notify:
26.09.2010 16:09, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> ImageMagick has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libgs.so.8()(64bit)
> On i386:
> ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.i686 requires libg
Hi all,
I plan to update update poppler in rawhide (Fedora 15) to new
development version 0.15 next week (at Monday, October 4th). Changes
against 0.14.x are:
core:
* Remove exception support
* Improve creation of Annotations
* Fix failure to parse PDF with dama
Compose started at Mon Sep 27 08:15:36 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.i686 requires libgs.so.8
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libgs.so.8()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64
On Saturday, September 25, 2010 09:03:08 pm Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:58:39 +0200
>
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Not a very latest thing but more like - more useful thing. Because
> > some useful "user experience" changes could lead to better user
> > experience even changing sl
On 26 September 2010 09:25, Piscium wrote:
> My question is this: what should be the name of the configuration file
> for Intel 32 bits architecture?
> config-x86 or
> config-i386 or
> config-i686 or
> one of the above followed by "-generic"?
My custom kernel seems to be running as well as the n
61 matches
Mail list logo
