On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 17:32 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
> PostgreSQL 9 was released
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235
>
> Are there any chances to get this for F14?
Here comes the upstream packager. :)
I have done major rewrite in 9.0 spec file, and it now supports parallel
ins
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:33:25 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Sep 25, 20
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:33:25 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
Brandon Lozza wrote:
> It w
Rex Dieter wrote:
> The kde-sig asked FESCo to consider up to 1 KDE version upgrade per
> release, and this was generally well-received during the last FESCo
> meeting, so no reason to panic.
That's good to hear. Then I think my strategy for the future will be to mostly
stay on the next to latest
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:33:49PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Please forgive me for being confused, but isn't the default for Fedora
> to build with -O2?
The issue exists for code compiled with at least -O1 - so -O2 compiled
code is affected as well.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
Hi.
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser wrote
> Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler
> bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1
> wrong-code by cmove Unfortunately this bug can corrupt user data
> silently.
Please forgive me for b
On 09/26/2010 09:47 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:41:04 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:32:14 +0200, Jan
>> Kratochvil wrote:
>>> gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14: PASS
>>> gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14: FAIL
>>> gcc-4.5.1-2.fc14: There was no -2.
>>> gcc-4.5.1-1.fc14: PASS
>>
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:41:04 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:32:14 +0200, Jan Kratochvil
> wrote:
> > gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14: PASS
> > gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14: FAIL
> > gcc-4.5.1-2.fc14: There was no -2.
> > gcc-4.5.1-1.fc14: PASS
>
> Does that mean the problem is restricted to pac
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:32:14 +0200,
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:58:05 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser
> > wrote:
> > > Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug:
> > > https://bugzilla.r
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:58:05 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser
> wrote:
> > Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by
> > cmove
[...]
> Do
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:22 -0700,
John Reiser wrote:
> Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by cmove
> Unfortunately this bug can corrupt user data silently.
>
> I have hit the bug
Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by cmove
Unfortunately this bug can corrupt user data silently.
I have hit the bug three times myself (bz 635508, 637303, 637461)
and consider myself lucky
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:30, Tom London wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, darrell pfeifer
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:55, Owen Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 14:04 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >> > > (nautilus:11408): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:55, Owen Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 14:04 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>>
>> > > (nautilus:11408): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion
>> > > `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
>> > > Seg
Compose started at Sun Sep 26 13:15:21 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires
libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit)
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I would like to exchange review requests - someone may pick up each of
> these three easy-to-review Erlang-related applications, and I will
> finish your stalled review request. One mine package for one yours -
> that's quite
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
>>> Brandon Lozza wrote:
>>>
It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to av
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
>>> Brandon Lozza wrote:
>>>
It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to av
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
>> Brandon Lozza wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to avoid
>>> panics :)
>>
>> Well, I personally do not want to say:
>>
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:26:46 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>I can't tell people Fedora is the best if it's not carrying the latest
>>upstream KDE, its just not possible. I'm constantly recruiting new
>>users. I'm in regular contact with the team of
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:26:46 -0400, you wrote:
>I can't tell people Fedora is the best if it's not carrying the latest
>upstream KDE, its just not possible. I'm constantly recruiting new
>users. I'm in regular contact with the team of people who run
>Techrights.
>
>If a new release of KDE comes ou
Compose started at Sun Sep 26 08:15:43 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.i686 requires libgs.so.8
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libgs.so.8()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
> Brandon Lozza wrote:
>
>> It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to avoid
>> panics :)
>
> Well, I personally do not want to say:
>
> "Hey, anytime you like down the road, you get an except
Hello All!
I would like to exchange review requests - someone may pick up each of
these three easy-to-review Erlang-related applications, and I will
finish your stalled review request. One mine package for one yours -
that's quite fair deal!
Here is the list of my packages for trade:
* https://b
This question is addressed at those with kernel building experience.
The Fedora wiki has instructions on building a custom kernel:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel
That's good, thanks.
Let's say that someone would like to build a kernel with different
configuration options. He or
25 matches
Mail list logo
